Advertisement

Relationships Between Stock Markets: Causality Between G8 Countries and Turkey

  • Kamil Demirberk ÜnlüEmail author
  • Nihan Potas
  • Mehmet Yılmaz
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

This study investigated relationships between stock markets in the Group of Eight (G8) countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the UK, and the USA) and the İstanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) by estimating eight different vector autoregressions (VARs). We applied the Johansen and Juselius cointegration test to identify the long-run relations between the indices. The modified Granger causality test proposed by Toda and Yamamoto was conducted to identify the causality, then forecast variance decomposition and impulse response analysis were employed to explore the impacts of unexpected shocks in the G8 countries’ stock markets on the ISE. The results showed that there was no cointegration between the ISE and the G8 countries’ markets, but they still affected the ISE to different degrees, and the DAX–ISE 100, CAC 40–ISE 100, and FTSE MIB–ISE 100 causal relationships were bidirectional.

Keywords

İstanbul stock exchange G8 countries Cointegration Causality Generalized variance decomposition Impulse response 

References

  1. Berument, H., & Ince, O. (2005). Effects of S&P500’s return on emerging markets: Turkish experience. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 1, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DeFusco, A. R., Geppert, J. M., & Tsetsekos, G. P. (1996). Long-run diversification potential in emerging stock markets. The Financial Review, 31, 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Society, 74, 427–431.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64, 813–836.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eun, S. C., & Shim, S. (1989). International transmission of stock market movements. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Francis, B. B., & Leachman, L. L. (1998). Superexogeneity and the dynamic linkage among international equity markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghosh, A., Saidi, R., & Johnson, K. H. (1999). Who moves the Asia–Pacific stock markets—us or Japan? Empirical evidence based on the theory of cointegration. The Financial Review, 34, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Granger, C. W. J. (1988). Causality, cointegration and control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, B. N., Yang, C. W., & Hu, W. S. (2000). Causality and cointegration of stock markets among United States, Japan and the South China Growth Triangle. International Review of Financial Analysis., 9, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, 1551–1580.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration: With applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasa, K. (1992). Common stochastic trend in international stock markets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 29, 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koop, G., Pesaran, M. H., & Potter, S. M. (1996). Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrica, 74, 119–147.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kwiatkowski, D. P., Philips, C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 1992, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng, S., & Perron, P. (2001). Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69, 1519–1554.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Onay, C. (2007). Cointegration analysis of Bovespa and İstanbul stock exchanges. Paper presented at the Oxford Business & Economics Conference, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution ofthe maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics 1. Oxford Bulletin of Economics andstatistics, 54(3), 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58, 17–29.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1998). Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrica, 75(2), 335–346.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phylaktis, P., & Ravazzolo, F. (2004). Stock market linkages in emerging markets: Implications for international portfolio diversification. International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 15, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richards, J. A. (1995). Comovements in national stock market returns: Evidence of predictability, but not cointegration. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 631–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, L. K., Brocato, J., & Rogers, J. E. (1993). Regularities in the data between major equity markets: Evidence from Granger causality tests. Applied Financial Economics, 3, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Syriopoulos, T. (2011). Financial integration and portfolio investments to emerging Balkan equity markets. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 21, 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregression with possibly integrated process. Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225–250.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang, J., Koları, J. W., & Min, I. (2003). Stock market integration and financial crises: The case of Asia. Applied Financial Economics, 13, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu, J. S., & Hassan, M. K. (2008). Global and regional integration of the Middle East and North African (MENA) stock markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48, 482–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zapata, H. O., & Rambaldi, A. N. (1997). Monte Carlo evidence on cointegration and causation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamil Demirberk Ünlü
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nihan Potas
    • 2
  • Mehmet Yılmaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Ankara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations