The Energy Policy of the European Union and Its Implications for Turkey

  • Ahmet Atilla
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


Energy has played a significant role in unifying the European nations and being an apparatus for peace building in Europe since the Second World War. In the postwar period the European Coal and Steel Community brought rival countries together as allies with regard to energy resources. Today, the energy issue remains a priority within the European institutional framework. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, more ex-Soviet East European countries have become members of the European Union (EU). This wider and deeper integration has led the EU to adopt comprehensive energy policies, so it is essential to examine the facets of the EU energy policy. Moreover, because of its strategic location, Turkey has become an active player in the energy trade between the Middle East, the Caucasus, and Europe. The number of pipelines that pass across Turkey has increased since the start of the 2000s. Turkey has become a candidate for membership of the EU and has had to comply with EU rules and norms, as well as internalizing the EU’s Acquis Communautaire. In this chapter, the evolution of the EU energy policy and Turkey’s integration into it are analyzed.


Energy policy European Union Turkey 


  1. Behrens, A., Egenhofer, C., & Pedersen, K. (2008). Energy policy for Europe: Identifying the European added-value. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies. Scholar
  2. Council of the European Union. (1974). Council resolution of 17 December 1974 concerning community energy policy objectives for 1985. Publications Office of the European Union.
  3. El-Agraa, A. M. (2011). The European union: Economics and policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, B. K. (2007). The European Union emissions trading scheme: Origins, allocation, and early results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1), 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grigas, A. (2012). The gas relationship between the Baltic States and Russia—politics and commercial realities. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knittel, C. R. (2013). Transportation fuels policy since the OPEC embargo: Paved with good intentions. American Economic Review, 103(3), 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Martella, R., & Smaczniak, K. (2012). Introduction to Rio+20: A reelection on progress since the first Earth Summit and the opportunities that lie ahead. Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 12(3), 4–50.Google Scholar
  8. Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). To tax or not to tax: Alternative approaches to slowing global warming. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stankeviciute, L., & Criqui, P. (2008). Energy and climate policies to 2020: The impacts of the European “20/20/20” approach. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2(2), 252–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stavins, R., Carraro, C., & Kolstad, C. (2008). Introduction to the issue. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gullberg, A. T., & Sartor, O. (2016). Shaping the “energy union”: Between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(5), 548–567. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yorkan, A. (2009). Avrupa Birliği’nin Enerji Politikası ve Türkiye’ye Etkileri. Bilge Strateji, 1(1), 24–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmet Atilla
    • 1
  1. 1.Turkish-German UniversityİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations