Advertisement

The Birth of Modernism: How the Science of Aesthetics Created One of the Most Popular Periods of Art

  • Barbara LarsonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)

Abstract

Despite contemporary post-modernist decades the still relatively recent paintings of Whistler, Gauguin, Van Gogh, Picasso, and Ernst Ludwig Kirchner remain in the ascendant in popularity. We think of these artists as Modern, but just when and how did Modernism in art come about?

References

  1. Aurier, A.: Les Isolés: Vincent van Gogh. Le Mercure de France. 1. Reprinted in Bouillon, J.-P. et al. (eds.) La Promenade du critique influent: Anthologie de la critique d’art en France, 1850–1900, p. 333. Hazan, Paris, 1990 (1890)Google Scholar
  2. Bain, A.: The Senses and the Intellect. J. W. Parker, London (1855)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bain, A.: The Emotions and the Will, 2nd edn. Longmans, Green & Co, London (1865)Google Scholar
  4. Brettell, R.: Impression: Painting Quickly in France, 1860–1890. Yale University Press, New Haven and London (2000)Google Scholar
  5. Baudelaire, C.: La peinture de la vie moderne. In: Florenne, Y. (ed.) Ecrits sur l’art, vol. 2. Le livre de poche classique, Paris, 1971 (1863)Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, C.: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 2nd edn. John Murray, London (1869)Google Scholar
  7. Darwin, C.: The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd edn. John Murray, London (1874)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson, G.: Darwin, Literature, and Victorian Respectability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  9. Denis, M.: Notes sur la peinture religieuse. Reproduced in Bouillon, J.-P. (ed.) Le ciel et l’Arcadie, pp. 32–48. Hermann, Paris, 1993 (1896)Google Scholar
  10. Denis, M.: Letter of January 26, 1906. In: Maurice, D. (ed.) Journal, vol. 3. Colombe, Paris (1957–59)Google Scholar
  11. Gauguin, P.: Letter to André Fontainas. Reproduced in Malingue, M. (ed.) Paul Gauguin, Letters to His Wife and Friends. MFA, Boston, 2003 (1899)Google Scholar
  12. Guyau, J.-M.: L’Art au point de vue sociologique [2001], reprint. Fayard, Paris (1888)Google Scholar
  13. Hatch, J.: A sense and essence of nature: wave patterns in the paintings of Frantisek Kupka. In: Ennis, A., Trower, S. (eds.) Vibratory Modernism, pp. 145–161. Houndmills, Palgrave (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henderson, L.: Vibratory modernism: Boccioni, Kupka, and the ether of space. In: Henderson, L., Clarke, B. (eds.) From Energy to Information: Representation in Science and Technology, Art and Literature, pp. 126–150. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2002)Google Scholar
  15. Kupka, F.: La Création dans les arts plastiques. Editions Cercle d’Art, Paris (1989)Google Scholar
  16. Laforgue, J.. Impressionism. (trans: Barrow S). In: Brettell, R. Impression: Painting Quickly in France, 1860–1890, pp. 233–235. Yale University Press, New Haven and London 2000 (1903)Google Scholar
  17. Larson, B.: Darwin, Burke, and the Biological Sublime. In: Larson, B., Flach, S. (eds.) Darwin and Theories of Aesthetics and Cultural History, pp. 17–36. Burlington, Vt. & Farnham, England, Ashgate (2013)Google Scholar
  18. Lewes, G.:Prolegomena. The History of Philosophy from Thales to Comte, 3rd edn., vol. 1, pp. xvi–xcv. Longmans, Green & Co., London (1867)Google Scholar
  19. Monet, C.: Letter to Durand-Ruel, January 12. In Wildenstein, D. (ed.) Claude Monet, Biographie et catalogue raisonné. Lausanne, 1974–9 vol. 2, p. 232 (1884)Google Scholar
  20. Pater, W.: The Earthly Paradise. In: Westminster Review, vol 90, pp. 300–312 (1868)Google Scholar
  21. Pissarro, C.: Camille Pissarro: Lettres à son fils Lucien. Rewald, J (ed.) Albin Michel, Paris (1950)Google Scholar
  22. Thomson, R: Emotive naturalism. In: Cogeval, G. (ed.) Claude Monet, 1840–1926, pp. 33–47. Galeries Nationales, Grand Palais, Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  23. Sheon, A.: Van Gogh’s Understanding of Theories of Neurosis, Neurasthenia and Degeneration in the 1880s. In: Masheck, J. (ed.) Van Gogh 100, pp. 173–191. Greenwood Press, Westport (1996)Google Scholar
  24. von Helmholtz, H.: Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leopold Voss, Leipzig (1867)Google Scholar
  25. von Helmholtz, H.: On the relation of optics to painting. In: Cahan, D. (ed.) Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, pp. 279–308. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995 (1871)Google Scholar
  26. Ward, M.: Pissarro, Neo-Impressionism, and the Spaces of the Avant-Garde. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996)Google Scholar
  27. Zervos, C.: Conversation avec Picasso. In: Bernadac, M.-L., Michael, A. (eds.) Pablo Picasso: Propos sur l’art, p. 1998. Gallimard, Paris (1935)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArtUniversity of West FloridaPensacolaUSA

Personalised recommendations