Advertisement

Some Ecological Thoughts About Artworks and Perception

  • William P. SeeleyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)

Abstract

Artworks are attentional engines. They are artifacts intentionally designed to direct attention to what we might call their artistically salient features. The artistically salient features of a work are those aspects of their formal-compositional structure that carry information about what they express, their point, purpose, or meaning. These aspects of a work reflect the range of compositional strategies and choices an artist has employed to produce their work. Critically, artists deploy exogenous and endogenous perceptual strategies tailored to direct attention and reveal what they mean to express with their artworks. Painters, for instance, manipulate the perceptual salience of different areas of the canvas to directly engage perceptual systems, e.g. manipulating contrasts in the tonal properties, hue value, or scale of spatial frequency information. However, shared art critical knowledge can also be exploited to indirectly engage endogenous attentional processes, shape perception, and guide a consumer’s understanding of what is expressed in a work. The range of exogenous and endogenous perceptual strategies an artist employs shape what an artifact affords a consumer as an artwork. Access to these affordances depends upon the structure of the works, the structure of perceptual systems, and an understanding of the broad range of art critical and cultural practices that define the artworld for a community at a time. In this chapter I will employ a diagnostic recognition framework and a biased competition theory of selective attention to develop a model for understanding the way artists exploit exogenous and endogenous perceptual strategies in their works and map the complex environment of an artwork.

References

  1. Bonnar, L., Gosselin, F., Schyns, P.G.: Understanding Dali’s slave market with the disappearing bust of Voltaire: a case study in the scale information driving perception. Perception 31, 683–691 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carroll, N.: Art, intention, and conversation. In: Gary, I. (ed.) Intention and Interpretation, pp. 97–131. Temple University Press, Philadelphia (1992)Google Scholar
  3. Dickie, G.: Is psychology relevant to aesthetics? Philos. Rev. 71(3), 285–302 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fodor, J.A.: Deja-Vu all over again: how Danto’s aesthetics recapitulates the philosophy of mind. In: Mark, R. (ed.) Danto and His Critics, pp. 41–54. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (2012)Google Scholar
  5. Grice, P.: Meaning. Philos. Rev. 66(3), 377–388 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kastner, S.: Attentional response modulation in the human visual system. In: Michael, P. (ed.) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, pp. 144–156. Guilford Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  7. Laland, K., Mathews, B., Feldman, M.W.: An introduction to niche construction theory. Evol. Ecol. 30, 191–202 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Levins, R., Lewontin, R.: The Dialectical Biologist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  9. Lewontin, R.: Gene, organism, and environment. In: Bendall, D.S. (ed.) Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge University Press, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  10. Livingstone, M.S.: Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing. Harry N. Abrams, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  11. Monbiot, G.: Feral: Rewilding the Land, the Sea, and Human Life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Noë, A.: Strange Tools. Hill and Wang, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  13. Richards, R.A.: Engineered niches and naturalized aesthetics. J. Aesthetics Art Criticism 75(4), 465–477 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sandler, I.: Judy Pfaff. Hudson Hills Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  15. Schyns, P.G.: Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions. Cognition 67, 147–179 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weitz, M.: The role of theory in aesthetics. J. Aesthet. Art Crit. 15(1), 27–35 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wittgenstein, L.: Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief. University of California Press, Berkeley (1966)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston CollegeUniversity of New HampshireManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations