Advertisement

The View Through Glass

Painters’ Science, Mathematicians’ Art, and the Magic of Shadows
  • Rossella LupacchiniEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)

Abstract

In his De pictura‚ Leon Battista Alberti used the tale of Narcissus, who was turned into a flower‚ to present painting as the flower of arts: “What is painting but the act of embracing by means of art the surface of the pool?” Indeed, the view through the surface of the pool, or through the (looking) glass‚ gives evidence of a theory of knowledge entailed by artificial perspective which mathematics and the philosophy of nature were not ready to accommodate. Narcissus’ metamorphosis calls attention not only to the critical function of a see-through plane for visual knowledge‚ but also to the magic of shadows. Narcissus did not fall in love with his own specular-image, but with a shadow that he believed to be of someone else. If the seduction of the other is the first step towards the recognition of the self, the magnetism of the shadow is the first step on the road to knowledge. Yet, the shadow was a challenge for painters. Taking a picture of reality, each painting is a ‘still life’, where shadow is essentially a changeable form. Leonardo was aware of the problem, which also arose in depicting the continuous transformation of nature. While artificial perspective will lead mathematicians to conceive of a visual geometry, which extends Euclid’s, a reverse perspective, namely a “doctrine of shadows,” will lead Leibniz to address Leonardo's demand for a geometry “which is done with motion.” In this article we will discuss how the dialogue between art and science, starting in the Renaissance, transformed our view of geometry and our understanding of natural processes. We will also try to rethink such an important contemporary issue like quantum interference effects.

References

  1. Alberti, L.B.: I libri della famiglia. In: Romano, R., Tenenti, A. (eds.) Torino, Einaudi (1969)Google Scholar
  2. Alberti, L.B.: On Painting [1435]. Penguin Books, London (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Berenson, B.: The Central Italian Painters of the Renaissance. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York and London (1909)Google Scholar
  4. Berenson, B.: Piero della Francesca. The Ineloquent in Art. Chapman & Hall, London (1954)Google Scholar
  5. Cassirer, E.: The Individual and the Cosmos in Renaissance Philosophy [1927]. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1963)Google Scholar
  6. Davis, M.: The Universal Computer. The Road from Leibniz to Turing. W. W Norton & Company, New York (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Desargues, G.: Oeuvres de Desargues. In: Poudre, M. (ed.) vol. I, Leiber, Paris (1864)Google Scholar
  8. Deutsch, D.: Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. In: Proceedings Royal Society London, 400 (1985)Google Scholar
  9. Deutsch, D.: The Fabric of Reality. Penguin Books, London (1997)Google Scholar
  10. Deutsch, D.: The Beginning of the Infinity. Explanations that Transform the World. Penguin Books (2011)Google Scholar
  11. Feynman, R.P.: Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 6/7 (1982)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kemp, M.: The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. Yale UP, New Haven (1990)Google Scholar
  13. Kemp, M.: Leonardo. Oxford UP (2011)Google Scholar
  14. Lacan, J.: Le stade du miroir comme formateur de la fonction de Je. Revue François de psychanalyse pp. 449–455 (1949)Google Scholar
  15. Leibniz, G.W.: Opera philosophica omnia. In: Erdmann, J.E. (ed.) Bernil, Eichleri (1840)Google Scholar
  16. Leibniz, G.W.: Démonstration qu’in n’y a point de figure précise et arrêtée dans les corps, in Lettres et opuscules inédits. In: Foucher de Careil, A. (ed.) Librairie Philosophique de Ladrange, Paris (1854)Google Scholar
  17. Leibniz, G.W.: Von dem Verhängnisse, in Hauptschriften zur Grundlegung der Philosophie. In: Cassirer, E. (ed.) Olms Hildesheim, (1906)Google Scholar
  18. Leibniz, G.W.: La Monadologie [1714], in Leibniz (1840); English trans. in Leibniz (1989)Google Scholar
  19. Leibniz, G.W.: Philosophical Essays. In: Ariew, R., Garber, D. (eds.) Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis & Cambridge (1989)Google Scholar
  20. Leibniz, G.W.: La caractétistique géométrique. In: Echeverría, J., Parmentier, M. (eds.) Librairie philosophique J. Vrin Paris, (1995)Google Scholar
  21. Leibniz, G.W.: New Essays on Human Understanding [1765]. In: Remnant, P., Bennett, J. (eds.) Cambridge UP (1996)Google Scholar
  22. Leonardo da Vinci: Treatise on Painting. In: Rigaud, J.F. (ed.) George Bell & Sons, London (1877)Google Scholar
  23. Leonardo da Vinci: Trattato della Pittura (cod. Vaticano Urbinate 1270), Roma, Unione Cooperativa Editrice (1890)Google Scholar
  24. Oldenburg, H.: The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, vol. IX. In: Hall A.R., Boas Hall, M. (eds.) The University of Wisconsin Press, London (1973)Google Scholar
  25. Panofsky, E.: Perspective as symbolic form [1925–26]. Zone Book, New York (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Communication StudiesUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations