Advertisement

Rational Zernike Functions Capture the Rotations of the Eye-Ball

  • Zoltán FazekasEmail author
  • Levente Lócsi
  • Alexandros Soumelidis
  • Ferenc Schipp
  • Zsolt Németh
Conference paper
Part of the Mathematics in Industry book series (MATHINDUSTRY, volume 30)

Abstract

Measurement and mathematical description of the corneal surface and of the optical properties of the human eye are actively researched topics. To enhance the mathematical tools used in the field, a novel set of orthogonal functions—called rational Zernike functions—are presented in the paper; these functions are of great promise for correcting certain types of measurement errors that adversely affect the quality of corneal maps. Such errors arise e.g., due to unintended eye-movements, or spontaneous rotations of the eye-ball. The rational Zernike functions can be derived from the well-known Zernike polynomials—the latter polynomials are used widely in eye-related measurements and ophthalmology—via an argument transformation with a Blaschke function. This transformation is a congruent transformation in the Poincaré disk model of the Bolyai-Lobachevsky hyperbolic geometry.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in the frame of contract EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00001: Talent Management in Autonomous Vehicle Control Technologies. The Project is supported by the Hungarian Government and co-financed by the European Social Fund. This research was also supported by Research Funds (OTKA) in the frame of the research contract No. K115804.

References

  1. 1.
    Belin, M.W., Khachikian, S.S.: An introduction to understanding elevation-based topography: how elevation data are displayed – a review. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 37, 14–29 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, D.H., Waring, G.O.: The subject-fixated coaxially sighted corneal light reflex: a clinical marker for centration of refractive treatments and devices. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 158, 863–874 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corbett, M., Rosen E.S., O’Brart, D.P.S.: Corneal Topography: Principles and Practice. BMJ, London (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fazekas, Z., Soumelidis, A., Schipp, F.: Utilizing the discrete orthogonality of Zernike functions in corneal measurements. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, IAENG, Hong Kong (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lócsi, L., Schipp, F.: Rational Zernike functions. Annales Univ. Sci. Budapest Sec. Comp. 46, 177–190 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Németh, Zs., Schipp, F.: Discrete orthogonality of Zernike–Blaschke functions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. (to appear)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pap, M., Schipp, F.: Discrete orthogonality of Zernike functions. Math. Pann. 16, 137–144 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pap, M., Schipp, F.: The voice transform on the Blaschke group II. Annales Univ. Sci. Budapest. Sec. Comp. 29, 157–173 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soumelidis, A., Fazekas, Z., Schipp, F., Csákány, B.: Description of corneal surfaces using discretised argument-transformed Chebyshev-polynomials. In: Proceedings of 18th Biennial International EURASIP Conference on Analysis of Biomedical Signals and Images, EURASIP, Darmstadt, pp. 269–274 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soumelidis, A., Fazekas, Z., Bódis-Szomorú, A., Schipp, F., Németh, J.: Specular surface reconstruction method for multi-camera corneal topographer arrangements. In: Recent Advances in Biomedical Engineering, pp. 639–660. IntechOpen, London (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soumelidis, A., Fazekas, Z., Pap, M., Schipp, F.: Discrete orthogonality of Zernike functions and its application to corneal measurements. In: Selected Papers of the International Conference in Electronic Engineering and Computing Technology, pp. 455–469. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soumelidis, A., Fazekas, Z., Pap, M., Schipp, F.: Generic Zernike-based surface representation of measured corneal surface data. In: Proceedings of the MeMeA, IEEE Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications, pp. 148–153. IEEE, Piscataway (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soumelidis, A., Fazekas, Z., Schipp, F.: Comparison of the corneal surface representations based on Chebyshev polynomials. In: Proceedings of the MeMeA, IEEE Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Piscataway (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zernike, F.: Beugungstheorie des Schneidenverfahrens und seiner verbesserten Form, der Phasenkontrastmethode. Physica 7, 689–704 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zheng, X., Yang, W., Huang, L., Wang, J., Cao, S., Geraghty, B., Zhao, Y.P., Wang, Q., Bao, F., Elsheikh, A.: Evaluating the repeatability of corneal elevation through calculating the misalignment between successive topography measurements during the follow up of LASIK. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 3122 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoltán Fazekas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Levente Lócsi
    • 2
  • Alexandros Soumelidis
    • 1
  • Ferenc Schipp
    • 2
  • Zsolt Németh
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Computer Science and Control (MTA SZTAKI)BudapestHungary
  2. 2.Department of Numerical Analysis, Faculty of InformaticsELTE Eötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations