Advertisement

The Importance of Nonhuman Primates in Waorani Communities of the Ecuadorian Amazon

  • Margaret Franzen LevinEmail author
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Ethnobiology book series (EBL)

Abstract

This chapter considers the importance of nonhuman primates in the subsistence and sharing behavior of the Waorani, an indigenous hunter–gatherer–horticulturalist group living in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Primate meat is commonly consumed in Waorani households, and primates are the species most often kept as pets. The large-bodied primates, as well as the peccary species, are shared between households with high frequency and contribute more than other prey species to the maintenance of consistent exchanges within the community. Frequent sharing of meat between households likely signals cooperative intent and reduces the risk of individuals not having meat to consume on a given day. The peccary species seem to be equally important to primates in regard to subsistence and sharing behavior. However, hunts recorded from a community that was recently established in an area of unhunted forest suggest that large-bodied primates might be the most important prey species when primate populations remain intact. The large harvest of spider monkeys from this area, and the conspicuous absence of spider monkeys from the harvests of some longer-established communities, suggests that the relative vulnerability of this species deserves further consideration.

Keywords

Waorani Ethnoprimatology Ecuadorian Amazon Hunting Food sharing Conservation 

Resumen

Este capítulo analiza la importancia de los primates no-humanos en la subsistencia y el comportamiento de intercambio de carne entre los Waorani de la Amazonía ecuatoriana. La carne de primates se consume comúnmente en los hogares Waorani, y los primates son las especies más frecuentemente mantenidas como mascotas. Los primates de gran tamaño, así como pecaríes, se comparten con mayor frecuencia entre los hogares a la vez que contribuyen más que otras especies de presa para el mantenimiento de intercambios dentro de la comunidad. El intercambio frecuente de carne entre los hogares probablemente muestra la intención cooperativa y reduce la posibilidad de que las personas no tengan carne para consumir. Las especies de pecaríes parecen ser tan importantes como las de primates en lo que se refiere a la subsistencia y el comportamiento de compartir. Sin embargo, las cacerías de una comunidad que se ha establecido recientemente en un área de bosque no-cazado sugiere que los primates de gran tamaño podrían ser las especies de presa más importantes cuando las poblaciones de estas permanecen intactas. La mayor caza de monos araña de esta zona, y la notoria ausencia de monos araña en las cacerías de algunas comunidades establecidas desde hace más tiempo, indican la vulnerabilidad relativa de esta especie y su mayor consideración.

Palabras Clave

Waorani etnoprimatología Amazonía ecuatoriana cacería intercambio de alimentos conservación 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded at various stages by a Fulbright Fellowship to Ecuador, a National Science Foundation Cultural Anthropology Dissertation Improvement Grant (0129826), a Wenner-Gren Dissertation Fieldwork Grant (6887), and a Gifford Center Grant (Program for Research on Population, Food and the Environment). I also received support from the Ecology Graduate Group at the University of California, Davis, as well as the Wildlife Conservation Society, Ecuador. I thank my dissertation advisor, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, and Loukas Barton for his assistance with the map. I also wish to thank Bernardo Urbani, Manuel Lizarralde, and an anonymous reviewer for their thoughtful comments. I am extremely grateful to the Waorani residents of Guiyero, Tiimpuca, and Dicaro who generously shared their time and knowledge with me.

References

  1. Alvard MS (1993) Testing the ecologically noble savage hypothesis – interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Hum Ecol 21(4):355–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckerman S, Erickson PI, Yost J, Regalado J, Jaramillo L, Sparks C, Iromenga M, Long K (2009) Life histories, blood revenge, and reproductive success among the Waorani of Ecuador. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) 106(20):8134–8139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bliege Bird RL, Smith EA, Bird DW (2001) The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blurton Jones NG (1984) A selfish origin for human food sharing: tolerated theft. Ethol Sociobiol 5:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodmer RE, Eisenberg JF, Redford KH (1997) Hunting and the likelihood of extinction of Amazonian mammals. Conserv Biol 11:460–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cormier L (2006) A preliminary review of neotropical primates in the subsistence and symbolism of indigenous lowland South American peoples. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology (University of Georgia). Paper 21. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmeea/21
  7. Di Fiore A (2001) Investigación ecológica y de comportamiento de primates en el Parque Nacional Yasuní. In: Jorgenson JP, Coello Rodríguez M (eds) Conservación y desarollo sostenible del Parque Nacional Yasuní y su área de influencia: memorias del seminario-taller Yasuní. Editorial SIMBIOE, Quito, Ecuador, pp 165–173Google Scholar
  8. Finer M, Vijay V, Ponce F, Jenkins CN, Kahn TR (2009) Ecuador’s Yasuni biosphere reserve: a brief modern history and conservation challenges. Environ Res Lett 4:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franzen M (2005) Huaorani resource use in the Ecuadorian Amazon: hunting, food sharing, and market participation. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  10. Franzen M (2006) Evaluating the sustainability of hunting: a comparison of harvest profiles across three Huaorani communities. Environ Conserv 33(1):36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franzen M, Eaves J (2007) Effect of market access on sharing practices within two Huaorani communities. Ecol Econ 63:776–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuentes A (2006) Human-nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology (University of Georgia) Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmeea/1
  13. Fuentes A, Hockings KJ (2010) The ethnoprimatological approach in primatology. Am J Primatol 72:841–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuentes A, Wolfe LD (eds) (2002) Primates face to face: the conservation implications of human-nonhuman primate interconnections. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Gurven M (2004a) Reciprocal altruism and food sharing decisions among Hiwi and Ache hunter-gatherers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:366–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gurven M (2004b) To give or not to give: an evolutionary ecology of human food transfers. Behav Brain Sci 27(4):543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurven M, Allen-Arave W, Hill K, Hurtado M (2000) “It’s a wonderful life”: signaling generosity among the Ache Paraguay. Evol Hum Behav 21(4):263–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hames RB (1990) Sharing among the Yanomamo: part I, the effects of risk. In: Cashdan E (ed) Risk and uncertainty in tribal and peasant economies. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 89–106Google Scholar
  19. Hames RB (2000) Reciprocal altruism in Yanomamo food exchange. In: Cronk L, Chagnon N, Irons W (eds) Adaptation and human behavior. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 397–416Google Scholar
  20. Hames RB, Vickers WT (1982) Optimal diet breadth theory as a model to explain variability in Amazonian hunting. Am Ethnol 9(2):358–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton WD (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am Nat 97(896):354–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. J Theor Biol 7:1–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkes K (1991) Showing off: tests of an hypothesis about men’s foraging goals. Ethol Sociobiol 12(1):29–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. High C (2015) Victims and warriors: violence, history, and memory in Amazonia. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, and SpringfieldCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill K, Kaplan H (1993) On why male foragers hunt and share food. Curr Anthropol 34(5):701–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holt FL (2005) The catch-22 of conservation: indigenous peoples, biologists, and cultural change. Hum Ecol 33(2):199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplan H, Hill K (1985) Food sharing among Ache foragers: tests of explanatory hypotheses. Curr Anthropol 26(2):223–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koester F (2001) El hombre y la biosfera en Yasuni. Nuestra Ciencia 3:23–29Google Scholar
  29. Lu F (1999) Changes in subsistence patterns and resource use of the Huaorani Indians in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Ph.D. dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu F (2001) The common property regime of the Huaorani Indians of Ecuador: implications and challenges to conservation. Hum Ecol 29(4):425–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu F (2010) Patterns of indigenous resilience in the Amazon: a case study of Huaorani hunting in Ecuador. J Ecol Anthropol 14(1):5–21Google Scholar
  32. Mena VP, Stallings JR, Regalado BJ, Cueva LR (2000) The sustainability of current hunting practices by the Huaorani. In: Robinson JG, Bennett EL (eds) Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 57–78Google Scholar
  33. Mittermeier RA (1991) Hunting and its effect on wild primate populations in Suriname. In: Robinson JG, Redford KH (eds) Neotropical wildlife use and conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 93–107Google Scholar
  34. Morgan CJ (1979) Eskimo hunting groups, social kinship, and the possibility of kin selection in humans. Ethol Sociobiol 1:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nabe-Nielson J (2001) Diversity and distribution of lianas in a neotropical rain forest, Yasuni National Park, Ecuador. J Trop Ecol 17:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmer CT (1991) Kin selection, reciprocal altruism, and information sharing among Maine lobstermen. Ethol Sociobiol 12:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Papworth S, Milner-Gulland EJ, Slocombe K (2013) The natural place to begin: the ethnoprimatology of the Waorani. Am J Primatol 75:1117–1128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Patton JQ (2000) Reciprocal altruism and warfare: a case from the Ecuadorian Amazon. In: Cronk L, Chagnon N, Irons W (eds) Adaptation and human behavior. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 417–436Google Scholar
  39. Patton JQ (2005) Meat sharing for coalitional support. Evol Hum Behav 26:137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peres CA, Lake IR (2003) Extent of nontimber resource extraction in tropical forests: accessibility to game vertebrates by hunters in the Amazon basin. Conserv Biol 17:521–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pitman NCA, Terborgh JW, Silman MR, Nunez VP, Neill DA, Ceron CE, Palacios WA, Aulestia M (2001) Dominance and distribution of tree species in upper Amazonian terra firme forests. Ecology 82(8):2101–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rival L (1993) The growth of family trees: understanding Huaorani perceptions of the forest. Man New Ser 28:635–652Google Scholar
  43. Rival L (1996) Blowpipes and spears: the social significance of Huaorani technological choices. In: Descola P, Pálsson G (eds) Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 145–164Google Scholar
  44. Robinson JG, Redford KH (1991) Sustainable harvest of neotropical forest mammals. In: Robinson JG, Redford KH (eds) Neotropical wildlife use and conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 415–429Google Scholar
  45. Smith EA, Bliege Bird RL (2000) Turtle hunting and tombstone opening: public generosity as costly signaling. Evol Hum Behav 21:245–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sponsel LE (1997) The human niche in Amazonia: explorations in ethnoprimatology. In: Kinzey WG (ed) New world primates: ecology, evolution and behavior. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 143–165Google Scholar
  47. Tucker B (2001) The behavioral ecology and economics of variation, risk, and diversification among Mikea Forager Farmers of Madagascar. Ph.D. dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  48. Urbani B (2005) The targeted monkey: a re-evaluation of predation on New World primates. J Anthropol Sci 83:89–109Google Scholar
  49. Valencia R, Foster RB, Villa G, Condit R, Svenning JC, Hernandez C, Romoleroux K, Losos E, Magard E, Balslev H (2004) Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. J Ecol 92:214–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vickers WT (1991) Hunting yields and game composition over ten years in an Amazon Indian territory. In: Robinson JG, Redford KH (eds) Neotropical wildlife use and conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 53–81Google Scholar
  51. Winterhalder B (1990) Open field, common pot: harvest variability and risk avoidance in agricultural and foraging societies. In: Cashdan E (ed) Risk and uncertainty in tribal and peasant economies. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 67–87Google Scholar
  52. Winterhalder B (1996a) Social foraging and the behavioral ecology of intragroup resource transfers. Evol Anthropol 5:46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Winterhalder B (1996b) A marginal model of tolerated theft. Ethol Sociobiol 17(1):37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yost J (1991) People of the Forest: the Waorani. In: Ecuador in the shadows of the volcano. Libri Mundi, Quito, pp 97–115Google Scholar
  55. Yost JA, Kelley PM (1983) Shotguns, blowguns, and spears: the analysis of technological efficiency. In: Vickers WT (ed) Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York, pp 189–224Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Group in EcologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations