Advertisement

General Conclusion

  • Saloua ChattiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Universal Logic book series (SUL)

Abstract

The study of the three systems shows many differences between the three authors considered. These differences concern their categorical logics as well as their modal logics and their hypothetical logics.

References

  1. 42.
    Blanché, Robert. 1953. Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria 19: 89–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 43.
    Blanché, Robert. 1969. Structures intellectuelles. Essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts, Editions Vrin, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. 50.
    Chatti, Saloua. 2012. Logical oppositions in Arabic logic, Avicenna and Averroes. In Around and beyond the square of opposition, ed. J. Y. Béziau and D. Jacquette. Basel: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 53.
    Chatti, Saloua. 2014. Avicenna on possibility and necessity. History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (4): 332–353.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 82.
    Hodges, Wilfrid. 2010. Ibn Sina on analysis: 1. Proof search. Or: Abstract State Machines as a tool for history of logic. In Fields of logic and computation: Essays dedicated to Yuri Gurevich on the occasion of his 70th birthday, ed. A. Blass, N. Dershowitz, and W. Reisig. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6300, 354–404. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 86.
    Hodges, Wilfrid, and Spencer Johnston. 2017. Medieval modalities and modern methods: Avicenna and Buridan. If Colog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 4 (4): 1029–1073.Google Scholar
  7. 87.
    Hodges, Wilfrid. 2018. Proofs as cognitive or computational: Ibn Sīnā’s innovations. Philosophy and Technology 31 (1): 131–153.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 88.
    Hodges, Wilfrid. 2018. Two early Arabic applications of model-theoretic consequence. Logica Universalis 12 (1–2): 37–54.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 115.
    Martin, John N. 2013. Distributive terms, truth and the port royal logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2): 133–154.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 116.
    Moretti, Alessio. 2009. The geometry of logical opposition. Ph.D. University of Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
  11. 123.
    Read, Stephen, and Wilfrid Hodges. 2010. Western logic. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 27: 13–45.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 124.
    Read, Stephen. 2012. The medieval theory of consequence. Synthese 187: 899–912.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Human and Social SciencesUniversity of TunisTunisTunisia

Personalised recommendations