Press-Party Parallelism and Media Agendas

  • Alper T. BulutEmail author
  • T. Murat Yildirim
Part of the Comparative Studies of Political Agendas book series (CSPA)


In this chapter, we aim to advance our knowledge of media behavior in different contexts by exploring the dynamics of media attention in Turkey, an electoral democracy that has had serious challenges in democratic processes. We first discuss in detail the trends in press-party parallelism and media ownership in Turkey, and then illustrate the ideological fragmentation of media outlets through the case of the December 17 Graft Probe. Utilizing original content-analytic datasets of media coverage from five newspapers during the period of 17 December 2013 – 30 January 2014, this brief case study illustrates the important differences in the way various newspapers featured stories about one of the biggest political scandals in Turkish politics. We then explore the broader patterns of media attention by analyzing the front-page coverage of Milliyet over the period of 1990-2001. Our aim is to go beyond the investigation of press-party parallelism and politicization of media outlets and delve further into the dynamics of media attention in Turkey over time.


Agenda diversity Political scandals Agenda-setting Press-party parallelism 


  1. Alexandrova, P., M. Carammia, and A. Timmermans. 2012. Policy Punctuations and Issue Diversity on the European Council Agenda. Policy Studies Journal 40 (1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arango, Tim. 2013. Growing Mistrust Between U.S. and Turkey Is Played Out in Public. New York Times, December.Google Scholar
  3. Arango, Tim, and Şebnem Arsu. 2013. Graft Inquiry Intensifies Turkish Political Rivalry. New York Times, December.Google Scholar
  4. Barkey, H.J. 2000. Hemmed in by Circumstances: Turkey and Iraq Since the Gulf War. Middle East Policy 7 (4): 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones. 2010. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baumgartner, F.R., and L. Chaqués-Bonafont. 2015. All News Is Bad News: Newspaper Coverage of Political Parties in Spain. Political Communication 32 (2): 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumgartner, F.R., C. Breunig, C. Green-Pedersen, B.D. Jones, P.B. Mortensen, M. Nuytemans, and S. Walgrave. 2009. Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayram, S. 2010. Political Parallelism in the Turkish Press, a Historical Interpretation. Turkish Studies 11 (4): 579–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Çarkoğlu, Ali. 2010. Introduction. Turkish Studies 11 (4): 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Çarkoğlu, Ali, and Gözde Yavuz. 2010. Pressparty Parallelism in Turkey: An Individual Level Interpretation. Turkish Studies 11 (4): 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Çarkoğlu, A., L. Baruh, and K. Yıldırım. 2014. Press-Party Parallelism and Polarization of News Media During an Election Campaign: The Case of the 2011 Turkish Elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics 19 (3): 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaqués-Bonafont, L., F.R. Baumgartner, and A. Palau. 2015. Agenda Dynamics in Spain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Committee to Protect Journalists. 2012. Turkeys Press Freedom Crisis: The Dark Days of Jailing Journalists and Criminalizing Dissent.
  14. Corke, Susan, Andrew Finkel, David J. Kramer, Carla Anne Robbins, and Nate Schenkkan. 2014. Democracy in Crisis: Corruption, Media, and Power in Turkey. Special Report. Freedom House.Google Scholar
  15. Demiralp, S. 2016. The Breaking Up of Turkey’s Islamic Alliance: The AKP-Gulen Conflict and Implications for Middle East Studies. MERIA Journal 20 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
  16. Doyle, Gillian. 2002. Media Ownership: The Economics and Politics of Convergence and Concentration in the UK and European Media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Elmas, E., and Kurban, D. 2011. Communicating Democracy-Democratizing Communication. Media in Turkey: Legislation, Policies, Actors.Google Scholar
  18. Gürsel, Kadri. 2014. In Latest Tape, Erdogan Calls Judiciary, Turkey Pulse.
  19. Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heper, M., and T. Demirel. 1996. The Press and the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 32 (2): 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hürriyet, Ekonomi. 2013. Ihlas Holding’e Büyük Piyango. Düzenleyen Ekonomi Hürriyet. November 14.
  22. Jennings, W., S. Bevan, A. Timmermans, G. Breeman, S. Brouard, L. Chaqués-Bonafont, C. Green-Pedersen, P. John, P.B. Mortensen, and A.M. Palau. 2011. Effects of the Core Functions of Government on the Diversity of Executive Agendas. Comparative Political Studies 44 (8): 1001–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. John, P., A. Bertelli, W. Jennings, and S. Bevan. 2013. Policy Agendas in British Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, B.D., and F.R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kaya, Raşit, and Barış Çakmur. 2010. Politics and the Mass Media in Turkey. Turkish Studies 11: 521–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kibris, A. 2011. Funerals and Elections: The Effects of Terrorism on Voting Behavior in Turkey. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (2): 220–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCombs, M.E., and D.L. Shaw. 1972. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCombs, M., and J.H. Zhu. 1995. Capacity, Diversity, and Volatility of the Public Agenda: Trends from 1954 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly 59 (4): 495–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newman, Bruce. 1999. The Mass Marketing of Politics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Öğret, Özgür, and Stefan Marten. 2010. Pressing for Freedom: The Rise of a Party’s Partisans. Hürriyet Daily News. September 6.Google Scholar
  32. Papatheodorou, Fotini, and David Machin. 2003. The Umbilical Cord That Was Never Cut The Post-dictatorial Intimacy Between the Political Elite and the Mass Media in Greece and Spain. European Journal of Communication 18: 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sayari, Sabri. 2007. Towards a New Turkish Party System? Turkish Studies 8: 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seymour-Ure, Colin. 1974. The Political Impact of Mass Media. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  35. Söğüt, Mine. 2010. Darbeli Kalemler. Getto Basın Yayın.Google Scholar
  36. Somer, Murat. 2010. Media Values and Democratization: What Unites and What Divides Religious Conservative and Pro-Secular Elites. Turkish Studies 11: 555–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tüysüz, Gül, Talia Kayalı, and Dana Ford. 2013. Amid Corruption Inquiry, Turkish Prosecutor Slams Police. The Cable News Network (CNN), December 27.Google Scholar
  38. Watts, N.F. 1999. Allies and Enemies: Pro-Kurdish Parties in Turkish Politics, 1990–94. International Journal of Middle East Studies 31 (4): 631–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yavuz, M.H. 2001. Five Stages of the Construction of Kurdish Nationalism in Turkey. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 7 (3): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yeşil, Bilge. 2014. Press Censorship in Turkey: Networks of State Power, Commercial Pressures, and Self-Censorship. Communication, Culture and Critique 7: 154–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yildirim, T.M. 2018. Gender and Agenda Diversity: Cognitive Differences in Representatives’ Information Processing. Policy Studies Journal. Scholar
  42. Yılmaz, G. 2016. Europeanisation or de-Europeanisation? Media Freedom in Turkey (1999–2015). South European Society and Politics 21 (1): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karadeniz Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey
  2. 2.University of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations