Advertisement

Self-potential Imaging of Seepage in an Embankment Dam

  • A. Bouchedda
  • M. ChouteauEmail author
  • A. Coté
  • S. Kaveh
  • P. Rivard
Chapter

Abstract

We have investigated seepage in Les Cèdres embankment dam (Valleyfield, Canada) by combining self-potential tomography (SPT), electrical resistance tomography (ERT), thermometry, electromagnetic (EM) conductivity and magnetic measurements. SPT consists of inverting self-potential data to retrieve the source current density distribution associated with water flow pathways (streaming current density) in embankment dams. The SPT inverse problem relies on the resistivity model of the dam that is obtained by 3-D ERT. Our 3-D SPT code is based on Occam’s inversion. The forward problem is solved using the finite-volume scheme. The investigated embankment dam is used to channel water from the Saint-Lawrence River to a hydroelectric plant. It separates in its upstream and downstream sides Les Cèdres and St-Timothée reservoirs respectively. St-Timothée reservoir is emptied during the winter and filled during the summer. Temperature monitoring was done in a borehole installed in the middle of the survey zone. To build a better understanding of water flow through the dam, it is important to separate the part of the source current density caused by the electrokinetic effect from the other sources (principally electro-chemical). In order to achieve that, ERT, EM31, magnetic and thermometric measurements have been used in the interpretation. EM conductivity maps allowed identifying two linear anomalies caused by metal-shielded electrical cables. The magnetic survey shows an important anomaly zone that is probably related to a metallic object. Therefore, all measurements near these zones were discarded from inversion. SPT shows a few seepage sources on the upstream dam side at a depth between 4 and 5 m. Two of them are confirmed by geotechnical testing. The water flow through the dam appears complex. It is partly controlled by a permeable zone that is well identified in the resistivity model. In the vicinity of the vertical temperature profile the SPT shows that the water flows parallel to the dam orientation and not through the borehole used for thermometry. This is why there is no clear indication of water seepage in temperature measurements. Finally, all observable seepage outlets on the downstream side can be related to the SPT anomalies and are observed as conductive zones in the resistivity model.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Hydro-Quebec for support for this project on seepage detection and modeling. Financial support has been provided by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by Hydro-Quebec (CRD Grants Program).

References

  1. Al-Saigh NH, Mohammed ZS, Dahham MS (1994) Detection of water leakage from dams by self-potential method. Eng Geol 37 (2): 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolève A (2013) Internal erosion detection in a concrete-lined canal using a multi-channel self-potential approach. In: Abstract of SAGEEP 2013, Denver, Colorado, 17–21 March 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Bolève A, Vandemeulebrouck J and Grangeon J (2012) Dyke leakage localization and hydraulic permeability estimation through self-potential and hydro-acoustic measurements: Self-potential ‘abacus’ diagram for hydraulic permeability estimation and uncertainty computation. J appl Geophys 86:17–28.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolève A, Revil A, Janod, F, Mattiuzzo JL, Fry JJ (2009) Preferential fluid flow pathways in embankement dams imaged by self-potential tomography. Near Surf Geophys 7(5): 447–462.Google Scholar
  5. Bolève A, Revil A, Janod F, Mattiuzzo JL, Jardani A (2007) Forward modelling and validation of a new formulation to compute self-potential signals associated with ground water flow. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11 (5): 1661–1671.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler D, Llopis JL, Dobecki TL, Wilt, M, Corwin R, Olhoeft G (1990) Part 2: comprehensive geophysical investigation of an existing dam foundation: engineering geophysics research and development. The Leading Edge 9(9):44–53.  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gex P (1980) Electrofiltration phenomena associated with several dam sites. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 357 (75): 39–50.Google Scholar
  8. Haines BM (1978) The detection of water leakage from dams using streaming potentials. In: Abstract of the SPWLA Nineteenth Annua Logging Symposium, El Paso, Texas, 13–16 June 1978.Google Scholar
  9. Ikard SJ, Revil A, Schmutz M, Karaoulis M, Jardani A and Mooney M (2014) Characterization of focused seepage through an earthfill dam using geoelectrical methods. Groundwater, 52(6), 952–965,  https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jardani A, Revil A, Bolève, A and Dupont JP (2008) 3D inversion of self potential data used to constrain the pattern of groundwater flow in geothermal fields. J Geophys Res 113:B09204.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jb005302.
  11. Kofoed, V, Jessop M, Wallace M, and Qian W (2011) Unique applications of MMR to track preferential groundwater flow paths in dams, mines, environmental sites, and leach fields. The Leading Edge 30(2):192–204.  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3555330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li Y and Oldenburg DW (1998) 3-D inversion of gravity data. Geophysics 63: 109–119.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loke MH (2016) Lecture notes on 2D & 3D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo Software. Available via DIALOG: http://www.geotomosoft.com/downloads.php. Accessed 01 Dec 2016.
  14. Minsley B, Sogade J and Morgan F (2007) Three-dimensional source inversion of self-potential data, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B02202,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jb004262.
  15. Ogilvy AA, Ayed, MA, Bogoslovsky, VA (1969) Geophysical studies of water leakages from reservoirs. Geophys Prosp 17:36–62.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Panthulu TV, Krishnaiah C, Shirke JM (2001) Detection of seepage paths in earth dams using self-potential and electrical resistivity methods. Eng Geol 59 (3–4): 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Petiau G (2000) Second Generation of Lead-lead Chloride Electrodes for Geophysical Applications. Pure appl. Geophys., 157:357–382.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Qualitas (2010) Geotechnical investigations, drilling and piezocone soundings on Les Cèdres dam. Report presented to Beauharnois Gatineau direction, Hydro-Québec, 2010, 63p. (In French).Google Scholar
  19. Revil A, Jardani A (2013) The Self-potential Method: Theory and Applications in Environmental Geosciences, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rittgers JB, Revil A, Planès T, Mooney MA and Koelewijn AR (2015) 4D imaging of seepage in earthen embankments with time-lapse inversion of self-potential data constrained by acoustic emissions localization. Geophysical Journal International, 200, 758–772,  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu432.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rozycki A, Fonticiella JMR, Cuadra A (2006) Detection and evaluation of horizontal fractures in earth dams using self-potential method. Eng Geol 82(3): 145–153.Google Scholar
  22. Rozycki A (2009) Evaluation of the streaming potential effect of piping phenomena using a finite cylinder model. Eng Geol 104 (1–2): 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schön J (2015) Physical properties of rock; Fundamentals and principles of petrophysics; 2nd edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  24. Sjödahl P, Dahlin T, Johansson S, LokeMH (2008) Resistivity monitoring for leakage and internal erosion detection at Hällby embankment dam. J of App Geophysics, 65 (3–4):155–164.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheffer M R (2002) Response of the self-potential method to changing seepage conditions in embankments dams. M.Sc. Thesis, Dept of Civil Eng, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  26. Sheffer M R (2007) Forward modelling and inversion of streaming potential for the interpretation of hydraulic conditions from self-potential data. Ph.D thesis; University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  27. Sheffer M R, Oldenburg D W (2007) Three-dimensional modelling of streaming potential. Geophys J Inter, 169 (3): 839–848.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith M, Côté A, Noël P, Babin D (2009) Characterizing seepage at the junction of two embankment dams. Abstract of the Canadian Dam Association. Available via DIALOG:http://www.cda.ca/proceedings%20datafiles/2009/2009-9b-01.pdf.
  29. Telford, W.M, Geldart, L.P and R.E Sheriff (1995) Applied Geophysics, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Zhdanov M (2015) Inverse Theory and Applications in Geophysics, 2nd Edition, Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bouchedda
    • 1
  • M. Chouteau
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. Coté
    • 3
  • S. Kaveh
    • 3
  • P. Rivard
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre Eau Terre Environnement, Institut national de la recherche scientifiqueQuebec CityCanada
  2. 2.Ecole Polytechnique de MontrealMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Institut de recherche d’Hydro-QuébecVarennesCanada
  4. 4.Université de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations