Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Nicolas Vandeviver
Chapter

Abstract

The conclusion recapitulates the book’s main intervention and argument by outlining the evolution of Said’s conceptions of literature and agency and asserting that the ‘the authority of literary criticism’ lies in Said’s conceptualization of literature as the expression of human experience, and agency as human will. Having discussed that Said pioneered to turn literary criticism into a form of political intervention in the interests of liberation, emancipation, and social justice, I conclude this book by addressing the startling paradox of Said’s critical practice. Despite having criticized the sanguinary aspects of humanism’s past, in raising itself as a paragon for human freedom against all forms of imperialism, Said appeals to an idealized, authoritative version of humanism.

Keywords

Authority Literature Agency Human experience Human will Humanism 

References

  1. Astarita, Tommaso. 2013. Introduction: ‘Naples Is the Whole World’. In A Companion to Early Modern Naples, ed. Tommaso Astarita, 1–10. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach, Erich. 2014. Vico and the National Spirit. In Time, History, and Literature: Selected Essays of Erich Auerbach, ed. James I. Porter, 46–55. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. A Note on Vico’s Concept of Knowledge. In Giambattista Vico: An International Symposium, ed. Giorgio Tagliacozzo, Hayden White, Isaiah Berlin, Max Harold Fisch, and Elio Gianturco, 371–378. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1991. Giambattista Vico and Cultural History. In The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas, ed. Henry Hardy, 49–69. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  5. Bilgrami, Akeel. 2004. Foreword. In Humanism and Democratic Criticism, ed. Edward W. Said, ix–xiii. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, Tony. 2008. Humanism. Second edition. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, Michel. 1994. La fonction politique de l’intellectuel. In Dits et écrits 1954-1988, ed. Michel Foucault, Daniel Defert, and François Ewald, 109–114. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  8. Gourgouris, Stathis. 2004. Transformation, Not Transcendence. Boundary 2 31 (2): 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Said, Edward W. 1966. Joseph Conrad and the Fiction of Autobiography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1975. Beginnings: Intention and Method. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1983. Introduction: Secular Criticism. In The World, the Text, and the Critic, ed. Edward W. Said, 1–30. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  13. Spitzer, Leo. 2015. Linguistics and Literary History. In Linguistics and Literary History: Essays in Stylistics, ed. Leo Spitzer, 1–40. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Young, Robert J.C. 2016. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Anniversary ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Vandeviver
    • 1
  1. 1.Ghent UniversityGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations