Advertisement

The Reaction in Secondary and Tertiary Education Curricula

  • Kevin C. de BergEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science book series (BRIEFSMOLECULAR)

Abstract

What makes the iron(III) thiocyanate reaction of benefit to chemistry educators is the fact that its K value for an ionic strength of 0.5 M is neither too high nor too small which means its incomplete nature should be more noticeable when discussing chemical equilibrium.

References

  1. 1.
    Quílez J (2004) A historical approach to the development of chemical equilibrium through the evolution of the affinity concept: some educational suggestions. Chem Ed Res Prac 5(1):69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pimentel GC (ed) (1963) CHEMISTRY: an experimental science. W.H. Freeman & Co., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malm LE(ed) (1963) Laboratory manual for chemistry (CHEM STUDY). W.H. Freeman & Co., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewin SZ, Wagner RS (1953) The nature of iron(III) thiocyanate in solution. J Chem Educ 445–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fowles G (1937) Lecture experiments in chemistry. G. Bell & Sons Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barrell FT (1960) Complete chemistry for seniors. The Jacaranda Press, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Board of Studies (2002) Chemistry Stage 6 syllabus. NSW Board of Studies, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwab JJ (1962) The teaching of science as enquiry. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwab JJ (1974) The concept of the structure of a discipline. In: Eiser EW, Vallance E (eds) Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. McCutchan Pub. Corp., Berkeley, pp 162–175Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gladstone JH (1855) On circumstances modifying the action of chemical affinity. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 145:179–223Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Board of Studies (2002) Chemistry Stage 6 syllabus. NSW Board of Studies, Sydney, p 6Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kilgour P, Hinz J, Petrie K, Long W, de Berg K (2015) Role-playing: a smorgasbord of learning types. Int J Innov Interdisc Res 3(1):11–24Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    University of York Science Education Group (1994) Salters advanced chemistry. Heineman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blackman A, Bottle S, Schmid S, Mocerino M, Wille U (2016) Chemistry, 3rd edn. Wiley, MiltonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silberberg M (2009) Chemistry: the molecular nature of matter and change, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burrows A, Holman J, Parsons A, Pilling G, Price G (2009) Chemistry3: introducing inorganic, organic and physical chemistry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hein M, Peisen JN, Miner RL (2011) Foundations of college chemistry in the laboratory, 13th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beran JA (2004) Laboratory manual for principles of general chemistry. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    James AM, Prichard FE (1974) Practical physical chemistry, 3rd edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maeder M, Neuhold Y-M (2007) Practical data analysis in chemistry. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Science Time Series-Chemical Science (2007) Artificial blood set. Eastcolight Ltd., Hong KongGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Avondale College of Higher EducationCooranbongAustralia

Personalised recommendations