Advertisement

Reformation and Revolution: Reflections on Luther, Lenin, and Liberal Democracy in Dark Times

  • Jeffrey C. IsaacEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Radical Theologies and Philosophies book series (RADT)

Abstract

The 1517 Protestant Reformation and the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution represent two crucial moments in the history of modern politics, in which forms of rebelliousness gave way to new forms of oppression. Luther’s rebellion asserted the metaphysical primacy of the individual believer, searching for an authentic relationship with and justification by God. Accused of heresy, Luther inaugurates a movement fiercely hostile to those who blaspheme against his Truth. Accused of radicalism, Luther becomes an apostle of a new kind of authoritarianism centered on an absolutist state. Lenin’s rebellion asserted the primacy of a disciplined and determined revolutionary party acting in the name of a revolutionary proletariat. Claiming to inaugurate a universal emancipation, Lenin institutes a (“proletarian”) dictatorship. Anticipating the “withering” of the state, he lays the foundations of an all-powerful, totalitarian state, foundations on which his successor, Stalin, constructs precisely such a state. Neither of these individuals anticipated or fully sought all of consequences of their acts, much less all that was done in their names after their passing. At the same time, both were zealous revolutionaries acting with an unwavering faith in the righteousness of their causes and the essential, even metaphysical, malevolence of their opponents. In this way, each achieved real “greatness,” one reason we now, today, recall their efforts. At the same time, each also engendered, and adamantly justified, much destruction, violence, and suffering.

In this chapter, the author expands on the power, and limits, of such ideological zealotry, and then reflects on some of the lessons that can be drawn for liberal democrats in the dark times in which we currently live.

References

  1. Ali, Tariq. 2017. The Dilemmas of Lenin. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Ash, Timothy Garton. 1989. The Uses of Adversity: Essays on the Fate of Central Europe. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  3. Boer, Roland. 2011. The New Luther? Marx and the Reformation as Revolution. MR Online January 18, 2011. https://mronline.org/2011/01/18/the-new-luther-marx-and-the-reformation-as-revolution/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  4. Connolly, William E. 2017. Aspirational Fascism: The Struggle for Multifaceted Democracy Under Trumpism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, James, and Sean Hanle. 2016. What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe: The Fading Mirage of Liberal Consensus. Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feuerbach, Ludwig. 1972. Preliminary Theses on the Reform of Philosophy. In The Fiery Brook: Selected Writings of Ludwig Feuerbach. Trans. and ed. Zawar Hanfi, 153–74. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  7. Finchelstein, Federico. 2017. From Fascism to Populism in History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goldfarb, Jeffrey. 1989. Beyond Glasnost: The Post-Totalitarian Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Harding, Neil. 1983. Lenin’s Political Thought. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Havel, Václav. 1987a. Open Letter to Dr. Husak. In Living in Truth, Václav Havel, ed. Jan Vladislav, 3–35. London/Boston: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1987b. The Power of the Powerless. In Living in Truth, Václav Havel, ed. Jan Vladislav, 36–122. London/Boston: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1987c. Politics and Conscience. In Living in Truth, Václav Havel, ed. Jan Vladislav, 136–157. London/Boston: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  14. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1994. The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  15. Isaac, Jeffrey C. 1998. Democracy in Dark Times. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2004. Rethinking the Legacy of Central European Dissidence. Common Knowledge 10 (1): 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2013. The Mirage of Neo-communism. Dissent 2013 (Summer): 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2017a. Is There Illiberal Democracy? A Problem with No Semantic Solution. Eurozine, August 9. Also Published at Public Seminar http://www.publicseminar.org/2017/07/is-there-illiberal-democracy/#.WfeaC0yZPox. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  19. ———. 2017b. What’s in a Name? Journal of Democracy 28 (2): 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koestler, Arthur, Ignazio Silone, and Richard Wright. 1950. The God That Failed. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  21. Korr, Kevin. 2017. Lenin’s ‘April Theses’ and the Russian Revolution. International Socialism, 154. http://isj.org.uk/lenins-april-theses-and-the-russian-revolution/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  22. Krastev, Ivan. 2016. What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe: Liberalism’s Failure to Deliver. Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. Lenin, V.I. 1917. The Tasks of the Proletariat in the Present Revolution (April Theses). https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/apr/04.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  25. ———. 1923. Last Testament. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1922/dec/testamnt/index.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  26. Lih, Lars. 2015. The Ironic Triumph of Old Bolshevism: The April Debates and Their Impact on Bolshevik Strategy. International Journal of Socialist Renewal, June 1. http://links.org.au/node/4451. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  27. ———. 2017. From February to October. Jacobin, May 11. https://jacobinmag.com/2017/05/russian-revolution-power-soviets-bolsheviks-lenin-provisional-government. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  28. Luxemburg, Rosa. 1918. The Russian Revolution: The Problem of Dictatorship. https://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1918/russian-revolution/ch06.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  29. Marini, Stephen A. 2004. Sectarianism. In Encyclopedia of Protestantism, ed. Hans J. Hillerbrand, vol. 4, 110–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Marx, Karl. 1843. A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/intro.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  31. ———. 1845a. Theses on Feuerbach. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  32. ———. 1845b. The German Ideology. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  33. ———. 1848. Manifesto of the Communist Party. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  34. ———. 1881. March 1881 Correspondence with Vera Zasulich. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1881/zasulich/index.htm Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  35. Matynia, Elzbieta, ed. 2014. An Uncanny Era: Conversations Between Václav Havel and Adam Michnik. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Michnik, Adam. 1998. Gray Is Beautiful. In Letters from Freedom: Post-Cold War Realities and Perspectives, ed. Irina Grudzinska, 317–328. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ost, David. 2016. Thoughts on the Hungarian and Polish New Right in Power. Public Seminar, September 21. http://www.publicseminar.org/2016/09/thoughts-on-the-hungarian-and-polish-new-right-in-power/#.V-qAbDtU7ow. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  39. Pettegree, Andrew. 2015. Brand Luther: How an Unheralded Monk Turned His Small Town into a Center of Publishing, Made Himself the Most Famous Man in Europe, and Started the Protestant Reformation. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. Schmitt, Carl. 1985. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, Quentin. 1978. Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Snyder, Timothy. 2018. The Road to Unfreedom. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  43. Sukhanov, Nikolai N. 1983. The Russian Revolution 1917: A Personal Recollection, ed. Joel Carmichael. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2009. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tismaneanu, Vladimir. 2000. Reinventing Politics: Eastern Europe from Stalin to Havel. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Trotsky, Leon. 1940. The Class, the Party, and the Leadership. https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1940/xx/party.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  48. Tucker, Aviezer. 2017. Fifty Shades of Czech Populism. The American Interest, October 23. https://www.the-american-interest.com/2017/10/23/fifty-shades-czech-populism/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  49. Weber, Max. 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, ed. Peter Baehr and Gordon Wells. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  50. Witte, Griff. 2017. In the Center of Europe, Politics Takes a Trumpian Turn with the Rise of Anti-Immigrant Billionaire. The Washington Post, October 17. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/in-center-of-europe-politics-takes-a-trumpian-turn-with-rise-of-anti-immigrant-billionaire/2017/10/16/f2697bd8-a854-11e7-9a98-07140d2eed02_story.html?utm_term=.95aa1494ee97. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  51. Woodword, Colin. 2015. The Power of Luther’s Printing Press. The Washington Post, December 18. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-power-of-luthers-printing-press/2015/12/18/a74da424-743c-11e5-8d93-0af317ed58c9_story.html?utm_term=.e3af4f272e61. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  52. Zantovsky, Michael. 2014. Havel: A Life. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  53. Žižek, Slavoj. 2002. Introduction: Between the Two Revolutions. In Revolution at the Gates: Selected Writings of Lenin from 1917, ed. Slavoj Žižek, 1–12. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations