Advertisement

Leadership OS pp 125-138 | Cite as

Direction

  • Nik Kinley
  • Shlomo Ben-Hur
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors introduce the first component of clarity in their Leadership OS model—direction. Using both their own and previous research, they describe the social and neural underpinnings of direction and the functions it plays in a leaders’ Operating System—how it affects people’s performance. They introduce a case study (Cees ’t Hart at Carlsberg) showing the role and importance of direction in a leaders’ OS. They then describe practical techniques leaders can use to increase the degree to which their OS enables and supports direction. Finally, they introduce a checklist leaders can use to test the extent people experience direction in their OS.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Hirsch, J. Peterson and R. Mar, “Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety,” Psychological Review, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 304–320, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Corbetta and G. Shulman, “Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 3, pp. 201–215, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Miller, “The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 1, pp. 59–65, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Aarts, “On the emergence of human goal pursuit: The nonconscious regulation and motivation of goals,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 1, pp. 183–201, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Jung, “Why are goals important in the public sector? Exploring the benefits of goal clarity for reducing turnover intention,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 209–234, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Rahman and P. Bullock, “Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organisational performance relationships: an empirical investigation,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Arvey, H. Dewhirst and J. Boling, “Relationships between goal clarity, participation in goal setting, and personality characteristics on job satisfaction in a scientific organization,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 103–106, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Mahon, S. Taylor and R. Boyatiz, “Antecedents of organizational engagement: Exploring vision, mood and perceived organizational support with emotional intelligence as a moderator,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, p. 1322, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Pearce and M. Ensley, “A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs),” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 259–278, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Dale and M. L. Fox, “Leadership style and organizational commitment: Mediating effect of role stress,” Journal of Managerial Issues, pp. 109–130, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Marks, S. Zaccaro and J. Mathieu, “Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 85, no. 6, p. 971, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Hong, A. Nahm and W. Doll, “The role of project target clarity in an uncertain project environment,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1269–1291, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Mohammed, L. Ferzandi and K. Hamilton, “Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct,” Journal of Management, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 876–910, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Van Knippenberg, J. Dawson, M. West and A. Homan, “Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance,” Human Relations, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 307–336, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Bateman, P. Bailey and H. McLellan, “Of rocks and safe channels: Learning to navigate as an interprofessional team,” Journal of Interprofessional Care, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 141–150, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Sims, G. Hewitt and R. Harris, “Evidence of a shared purpose, critical reflection, innovation and leadership in interprofessional healthcare teams: A realist synthesis,” Journal of Interprofessional Care, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 209–215, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Alper, D. Tjosvold and K. Law, “Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 33–52, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. McComb, S. Green and W. Compton, “Project Goals, Team Performance, and Shared Understanding,” Engineering Management Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 7–12, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Kellermanns, J. Walter, S. Floyd, C. Lechner and J. Shaw, “To agree or not to agree? A meta-analytical review of strategic consensus and organizational performance,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 126–133, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Jing, G. Avery and H. Bergsteiner, “Enhancing performance in small professional firms through vision communication and sharing,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 599–620, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Aga, “Transactional leadership and project success: The moderating role of goal clarity,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 100, pp. 517–525, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Purcell, N. Kinnie, S. Hutchinson, B. Rayton and J. Swart, People management and performance, London and New York: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Colakoglu, “Shared vision in MNE subsidiaries: The role of formal, personal, and social control in its development and its impact on subsidiary learning,” Thunderbird International Business Review, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 639–652, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Kantabutra, “What do we know about vision,” The Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 24, no. 2, 2008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Flood, E. Hannan, K. Smith, T. Turner, M. West and J. Dawson, “Chief executive leadership style, consensus decision making, and top management team effectiveness,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 401–420, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Stout, J. Cannon-Bowers, E. Salas and D. Milanovich, “Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established,” Human Factors, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 61–71, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. de Shazer, Words were originally magic, London, UK: W.W. Norton, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Allen and J. Allen, “A sense of community, a shared vision and a positive culture: Core enabling factors in successful culture based health promotion,” American Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 40–47, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y. Yuan, J. Major-Girardin and S. Brown, “Storytelling is intrinsically mentalistic: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of narrative production across modalities,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1298–1314, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Carton, C. Murphy and J. Clark, “A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1544–1570, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Reiter-Palmon, B. Wigert and T. de Vreede, “Team creativity and innovation: The effect of group composition, social processes, and cognition,” in Handbook of Organizational Creativity, Cambridge, MA, Academic Press, 2012, pp. 295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nik Kinley
    • 1
  • Shlomo Ben-Hur
    • 2
  1. 1.WokingUK
  2. 2.LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations