Leadership OS pp 187-197 | Cite as


  • Nik Kinley
  • Shlomo Ben-Hur


In this chapter, the authors introduce the second element of their Leadership OS model, momentum. Using both their own and previous research, they describe the four components of momentum—motivation, empowerment, confidence and connection. They reveal the research showing the functions momentum plays in a leaders’ Operating System—how it affects people’s performance. And they introduce a case study that highlights the role and importance of momentum in leadership (Tony Hsieh, CEO of Zappo’s).


  1. 1.
    J. Halbesleben and A. Wheeler, “The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave,” Work & Stress, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 242–256, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Slater, S. Haslam and N. Steffens, “Singing it for ‘us’: Team passion displayed during national anthems is associated with subsequent success,” European Journal of Sport Science, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 541–549, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Green Jr., E. Finkel, G. Fitzsimons and F. Gino, “The energizing nature of work engagement: Toward a new need-based theory of work motivation,” Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 37, pp. 1–18, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Hays, O. Thomas, I. Maynard and M. Bawden, “The role of confidence in world-class sport performance,” Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1185–1199, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Moritz, D. Feltz, K. Fahrbach and D. Mack, “The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review,” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 280–294, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Centre for Army Leadership, “The army leadership code” [Online]. Available: Accessed 27 May 2019.
  7. 7.
    F. Mendes and M. Stander, “Positive organisation: The role of leader behaviour in work engagement and retention,” South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Xu and H. Cooper Thomas, “How can leaders achieve high employee engagement?” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 399–416, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Schunk and P. Ertmer, “Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions,” in M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000, pp. 631–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Harter, F. Schmidt and T. Hayes, “Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 87, no. 2, p. 268, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Pfeffer and R. Sutton, “Profiting from evidence-based management,” Strategy & Leadership, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 35–42, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Walumbwa, B. Avolio and W. Zhu, “How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 61, no. 4, p. 793–825, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Britt, C. Castro and A. Adler, “Self-engagement, stressors, and health: A longitudinal study,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1475–1486, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Christian, A. Garza and J. Slaughter, “Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 89–136, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    AON, “2018 trends in global employee engagement,” New York, NY: AON Plc., 2018.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Wollard and B. Shuck, “Antecedents to employee engagement: A structured review of the literature,” Advances in Developing Human Resources, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 429–446, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Bailey, A. Madden, K. Alfes and L. Fletcher, “The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis,” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31–53, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Bakker, “Daily fluctuations in work engagement: An overview and current directions,” European Psychologist, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 227–236, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Breevaart, A. Bakker, J. Hetland, E. Demerouti, O. Olsen and R. Espevik, “Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 87, no. 1, p. 138, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nik Kinley
    • 1
  • Shlomo Ben-Hur
    • 2
  1. 1.WokingUK
  2. 2.LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations