Advertisement

Internationalising SMEs and Social Networks in the Global South

  • Jackson MusonaEmail author
  • Agnes Asemokha
  • Lasse Torkkeli
  • Pasi Syrjä
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets book series (PSIEM)

Abstract

Following a critique of previous firm-centred conceptualisations of the bottom of pyramid markets that gave little relevance to the role of consumers in value creation. Questions regarding the best ways to approach and mutually harness the potential of these markets remain unanswered. The purpose of this study is to help fill this gap by applying a sociological view to economic activities within BOP markets. Specifically, we explore how social networks influence internationalising SMEs business models in BOP markets. Through exploring the activities of one international SME in Zambia and comparing them to another local SME in South Africa by means of inductive grounded theory, we identified seven processes that define social embeddedness and five contextual conditions and mechanisms that lead to embeddedness. Finally, we offer implications for theory and managers of BOP ventures.

References

  1. Acheampong, G., & Dana, L. o.-P. (2017). Liability of foreignness in fast-expanding markets: Evidence from Ghana. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(1), 51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21761.
  2. Agarwal, N., Chakrabarti, R., Brem, A., & Bocken, N. (2018). Market driving at bottom of the pyramid (BoP): An analysis of social enterprises from the healthcare sector. Journal of Business Research, 86, 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2002). An institutional perspective on the role of culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. (2010). Rapid institutional shifts and the co-evolution of entrepreneurial firms in transition economies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, A. R., & Jack, S. L. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, A., Park, J., & Jack, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial social capital: Conceptualizing social capital in new high-tech firm. International Small Business Journal, 25(3), 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, R. B., & Giberson, R. J. (2004). Aboriginal entrepreneurship and economic development in Canada: Thoughts on current theory and practice. Ethnic Entrepreneurship: Structure and Process International Research in the Business Disciplines, 4, 141–167.Google Scholar
  8. Ansari, S., Munir, K., & Gregg, T. (2012). Impact at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 813–842.Google Scholar
  9. Atsmon, Y., Child, P., Dobbs, R., & Narasimhan, L. (2012). Winning the $30 trillion decathlon: Going for gold in emerging markets. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 1–18.Google Scholar
  10. Ausrød, V. L., Sinha, V., & Widding, Ø. (2017). Business model design at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 982–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beckerman, W. (1956). Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 38(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhatt, P., & Altinay, L. (2013). How social capital is leveraged in social innovations under resource constraints? Management Decision, 51(9), 1772–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bidit, L. D., Pandit, A., Saren, M., & Bhowmick, S. (2015). Co-creation of value at the bottom of the pyramid: Analysing Bangladeshi farmers’ use of mobile telephony. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 40–48.Google Scholar
  14. Björkman, I., & Kock, S. (1995). Social relationships and business networks: The case of Western companies in China. International Business Review, 4(4), 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, 345–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calton, J. M., Werhane, P. H., Hartman, Laura, P., & Bevan, D. (2013). Building partnerships to create social and economic value at the base of the global development pyramid. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 721–733.Google Scholar
  18. Casson, M., & Della Giusta, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and social capital: Analysing the impact of social networks on entrepreneurial activity from a rational action perspective. International Small Business Journal, 25, 220–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chell, E., & Baines, S. (2000). Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chironga, M., Leke, A., van Wamelen, A., & Lund, S. (2011). The globe: Cracking the next growth market: Africa. Harvard Business Review, 89(5), 117–123.Google Scholar
  21. Chua, C. E., Lim, W.-K., Sia, K. S., & Soh, C. (2012). Enacting clan control in complex IT projects: A social capital perspective. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  23. Daamen, B., Hennart, J. F., Kim, D.-J., & Park, Y.-R. (2007). Sources of and responses to the liability of foreignness: The case of Korean companies in the Netherlands. Global Economic Review, 36(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dai, W., & Liao, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial attention to deregulations and reinvestments by private firms: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–30.Google Scholar
  25. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2004). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellis, P. D. (2011). Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellis, P., & Pecotich, A. (2001). Social factors influencing export initiation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Esposito, M., Kapoor, A., & Goyal, S. (2012). Enabling healthcare services for the rural and semi-urban segments in India: When shared value meets the bottom of the pyramid. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(4), 514–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geleilate, J.-M. G., Magnusson, P., Parente, R. C., & Alvarado-Vargas, M. J. (2016). Home country institutional effects on the multinationality-performance relationship: A comparison between emerging and developed market multinationals. Journal of International Management, 22, 380–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ghauri, P. (2004). Designing and conducting case studies in international business research. In R. P. Welch (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business (pp. 109–124). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elger.Google Scholar
  32. Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.Google Scholar
  33. Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gorostidi-Martinez, H., & Zhao, X. (2017). Strategies to avoid liability of foreignness when entering a new market. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 14(1), 46–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hammond, A. L., Kramer, W. J., Katz, R., Tran, J., & Walker, C. (2007). The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hart, S. L., & London, T. (2005). Developing native capability: What multinational corporations can learn from the base of the pyramid. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 28–33.Google Scholar
  40. Heuër, A. (2017). Women-to-women entrepreneurial energy networks: A pathway to green energy uptake at the base of pyramid. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 22, 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hirschman, A. O. (1982). Rival interpretations of market society: Civilizing, destructive, or feeble? Journal of Economic Literature, 20(14), 63–84.Google Scholar
  42. Horner, R., & Nadvi, K. (2018). Global value chains and the rise of the global south: Unpacking twenty-first century polycentric trade. Global Networks, 18(1), 207–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huggins, R. (2000). The success and failure of policy-implanted inter-firm network initiatives: Motivations, processes and structure. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(2), 11–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huggins, R. (2010). Forms of network resource: Knowledge access and the role of inter-firm networks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 335–352.Google Scholar
  45. Idris, B., & Saridakis, G. (2018). Local formal interpersonal networks and SMEs internationalisation: Empirical evidence from the UK. International Business Review, 27(3), 610–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. IFC. (2012). From gap to opportunity: Business models for scaling up energy access. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation. Retrieved June 3, 2018, from https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/publications/publications_report_gap-opportunity.
  47. Johannisson, B. (1988). Business formation—A network approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4(3–4), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johannisson, B., & Landström, H. (1997). Research in entrepreneurship and small business—State of the art in Sweden. In H. Landström, F. Hermann, & J. M. Veciana (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and small business research in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  49. Kandachar, P., Diehl, J. C., Parmar, V. S., & Shivarama, K. C. (2011). Designing with emerging markets: Design of products and services (2011 ed.). Delft: Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
  50. Kistruck, G. M., Webbb, J. W., Sutter, C. J., & Bailey, A. V. (2015). The double-edged sword of legitimacy in base-of-the-pyramid markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(3), 436–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Klein, M. H. (2008). Poverty alleviation through sustainable strategic business models: Essays on poverty alleviation as a business strategy. Doctoral dissertation. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from https://repub.eur.nl/pub/13482/EPS2008135STR9058921680Klein.pdf.
  52. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ladd, T. (2017). Business models at the bottom of the pyramid: Leveraging context in undeveloped markets. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(1), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Linna, P. (2013). Bricolage as a means of innovation in a resource-scarce environment: A study of innovator-entrepreneurs at the BOP. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 18(3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Loane, S., & Bell, J. (2006). Rapid internationalisation among entrepreneurial firms in Australia, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand. International Marketing Review, 23(5), 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. London, T. (2008). The base-of-the-pyramid perspective: A new approach to poverty alleviation. 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008. Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  59. London, T., Anupindi, R., & Sheth, S. (2010). Creating mutual value: Lessons from ventures serving base of the pyramid producer. Journal of Business Research, 63(6), 582–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Manolova, T. S., Manev, I. M., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2010). In good company: The role of personal and inter-firm networks for new-venture internationalization in a transition economy. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Ostgaard, T. A., & Birley, S. (1994). Personal networks and firm competitive strategy—A strategic or coincidental match? Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2014). Framing resource-constrained innovation at the “bottom of the pyramid”. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 92, 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Recognizing opportunities for sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35(4), 631–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy at Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  67. Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Prahalad, C. K. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pruthi, S. (2014). Social ties and venture creation by returnee entrepreneurs. International Business Review, 23(6), 1139–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ramachandran, V. S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  71. Randrianasolo, A. A. (2018). Organizational legitimacy, corporate social responsibility, and bottom of the pyramid consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 30(3), 206–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2009). Global village vs. small town: Understanding networks at the base of the pyramid. International Business Review, 19(2), 126–139.Google Scholar
  73. Root, F. R. (1994). Entry strategies for international markets. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  74. Rosca, E. (2017). Sustainable business at the base of the pyramid: An empirical investigation. Doctoral dissertation, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany. doi:579-opus-1007554.
  75. Sánchez, P., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). Business model innovation and sources of Value Creation in Low-Income Markets. European Management Review, 7, 138–154.Google Scholar
  76. Sánchez, P., Ricart, J. E., & Rodríguez, M. Á. (2005). Influential factors in becoming socially embedded in low-income markets. Greener Management International, 51, 19–38.Google Scholar
  77. Sargut, G. (1999). Do entrepreneurs dream of black sheep?: Toward a structural inquiry into the entrepreneur’s position in the social system. New Orleans: Nineth Annual Global Entrepreneurship Research Conference.Google Scholar
  78. Schuster, T., & Holtbrügge, D. (2012). Market entry of multinational companies in markets at the bottom of the pyramid: A learning perspective. International Business Review, 21(5), 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. SEED. (2018). Promoting entrepreneurship for sustainable development. Webpage, SEED. Retrieved December 2017, from https://www.seed.uno/awards/all/2016.html.
  80. Sharma, D. D., & Blomstermo, A. (2003). The internationalization process of born globals: A network view. International Business Review, 12(6), 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shirokova, G., & McDougall-Covin, P. (2010). The role of social networks and institutions in the internationalization of Russian entrepreneurial firms: Do they matter? Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10(3), 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sigfusson, T., & Harris, S. (2013). Domestic market context and international entrepreneurs’ relationship portfolios. International Business Review, 22(1), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  85. Torri, M.-C. (2010). Community-based enterprises: A promising basis towards an alternative entrepreneurial model for sustainability enhancing livelihoods and promoting socio-economic development in rural India. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. UNCTAD. (2005). World Investment Report, Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. New York and Geneva: United Nations. Retrieved May 2018, from http://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2005_en.pdf.
  87. UNDP. (2004). Forging a global south: United Nations Day for south-south cooperation. Report. Washington, DC: United Nations Development Program. Retrieved April 2018, from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/china/docs/Publications/UNDP-CH-PR-Publications-UNDay-for-South-South-Cooperation.pdf.
  88. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Williams, N., & Vorley, T. (2015). Institutional asymmetry: How formal and informal institutions affect entrepreneurship in Bulgaria. International Small Business Journal, 33(8), 840–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wiseman, J. P. (1979). The research web. In J. Bynner & K. M. Stribley (Eds.), Social research: Principles and procedures (pp. 113–121). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  93. Witt, P. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(5), 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. World Bank. (2012a). Doing business. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  95. World Bank. (2012b). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  96. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Guest editors’ introduction strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 0022–2380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  98. Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhu, H., Hitt, M., & Tihanyi, L. (2007). The internationalization of SMEs in emerging economies: Institutional embeddedness and absorptive capacities. Journal of Small Business and Strategy, 17(2), 1–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jackson Musona
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agnes Asemokha
    • 1
  • Lasse Torkkeli
    • 1
  • Pasi Syrjä
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business and ManagementLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations