Advertisement

Neuroethics in Leadership Research and Practice

  • Joohyung Kim
  • David A. WaldmanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Neuroethics book series (AIN)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a great proliferation of interest in neuroscience applications to both research and practice in the area of leadership. In terms of research, this interest raises questions regarding the treatment of research participants, storage and use of data, and so forth. But even greater issues have arisen with regard to practice, including areas pertaining to employee selection or placement, neurofeedback, and what might be termed “brain training.” Despite valid concerns, we argue that ethical considerations in the neuroscience of leadership may not be as vexing as they appear. Instead, these considerations can be readily addressed, particularly with regard to basic research methods. On the other hand, continuing attention will need to be paid to practice-based, ethical issues.

Keywords

Leadership Organizational neuroscience Ethics fMRI qEEG Neurofeedback 

References

  1. Appel JM. When the boss turns pusher: a proposal for employee protections in the age of cosmetic neurology. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(8):616–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagozzi RP, Verbeke WJ, Dietvorst RC, Belschak FD, van den Berg WE, Rietdijk WJ. Theory of mind and empathic explanations of Machiavellianism: a neuroscience perspective. J Manag. 2013;39(7):1760–98.Google Scholar
  3. Balthazard PA, Waldman DA, Thatcher RW, Hannah ST. Differentiating transformational and non-transformational leaders on the basis of neurological imaging. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(2):244–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswal BB, Mennes M, Zuo X-N, Gohel S, Kelly C, Smith SM, et al. Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(10):4734–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Braeutigam S, Lee N, Senior C. A role for endogenous brain states in organizational research: moving toward a dynamic view of cognitive processes. Organ Res Methods. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117692104
  6. Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Yeo BT. Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(7):832–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatterjee A. Cosmetic neurology: the controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood. Neurology. 2004;63(6):968–74.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatterjee A. Brain enhancement in healthy adults. In: Chatterjee A, Farah MJ, editors. Neuroethics in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke DD, Sokoloff L. Circulation and energy metabolism of the brain. In: Agranoff BW, Siegel GJ, editors. Basic neurochemistry. Molecular, cellular and medical aspects. 6th ed. New York: Lippincott-Raven; 1999. p. 637–70.Google Scholar
  10. Cole MW, Bassett DS, Power JD, Braver TS, Petersen SE. Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of the human brain. Neuron. 2014;83(1):238–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeYoung CG, Hirsh JB, Shane MS, Papademetris X, Rajeevan N, Gray JR. Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: brain structure and the big five. Psychol Sci. 2010;21(6):820–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobbins GH, Lane IM, Steiner DD. A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. J Organ Behav. 1988;9(3):281–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elkins TJ, Phillips JS. Job context, selection decision outcome, and the perceived fairness of selection tests: biodata as an illustrative case. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(3):479–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Farah MJ. Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(1):34–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(9):700–11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Glimcher PW, Camerer CF, Fehr E, Poldrack RA. Introduction: a brief history of neuroeconomics. In: Glimcher PW, Camerer CF, Fehr E, Poldrack RA, editors. Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain. London: Academic; 2009. p. 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. Gruzelier JH. EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. I: A review of cognitive and affective outcome in healthy participants. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;44:124–41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hannah ST, Balthazard PA, Waldman DA, Jennings PL, Thatcher RW. The psychological and neurological bases of leader self-complexity and effects on adaptive decision-making. J Appl Psychol. 2013;98(3):393–411.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hausknecht JP, Day DV, Thomas SC. Applicant reactions to selection procedures: an updated model and meta-analysis. Pers Psychol. 2004;57(3):639–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Highhouse S. Designing experiments that generalize. Organ Res Methods. 2009;12(3):554–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang Z, Zhang J, Longtin A, Dumont G, Duncan NW, Pokorny J, et al. Is there a nonadditive interaction between spontaneous and evoked activity? Phase-dependence and its relation to the temporal structure of scale-free brain activity. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(2):1037–59.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Huster RJ, Debener S, Eichele T, Herrmann CS. Methods for simultaneous EEG-fMRI: an introductory review. J Neurosci. 2012;32(18):6053–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Illes J, Kirschen MP, Edwards E, Stanford LR, Bandettini P, Cho MK, Ford PJ, Glover GH, Kulynych J, Macklin R, Michael DB. Incidental findings in brain imaging research: what should happen when a researcher sees a potential health problem in a brain scan from a research subject? Science (New York, NY). 2006;311(5762):783–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jack AI, Rochford KC, Friedman JP, Passarelli AM, Boyatzis RE. Pitfalls in organizational neuroscience: a critical review and suggestions for future research. Organ Res Methods. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117708857
  25. Johnston SJ, Boehm SG, Healy D, Goebel R, Linden DE. Neurofeedback: a promising tool for the self-regulation of emotion networks. NeuroImage. 2010;49(1):1066–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim MJ, Whalen PJ. The structural integrity of an amygdala–prefrontal pathway predicts trait anxiety. J Neurosci. 2009;29(37):11614–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lieberman MD. Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:259–89.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindebaum D. Critical essay: building new management theories on sound data? The case of neuroscience. Hum Relat. 2016;69(3):537–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindebaum D, Raftopoulou E. What would John Stuart Mill say? A utilitarian perspective on contemporary neuroscience debates in leadership. J Bus Ethics. 2017;144(4):813–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008;453(7197):869–78.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Marcus D, editor. Neuroethics: mapping the field. Proceedings of the Dana Foundation Conference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  32. Moll J, Weingartner JH, Bado P, Basilio R, Sato JR, Melo BR, et al. Voluntary enhancement of neural signatures of affiliative emotion using fMRI neurofeedback. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97343.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nemeroff CB. Neurobiological consequences of childhood trauma. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(Supp11):18–28.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Racine E, Bar-Ilan O, Illes J. fMRI in the public eye. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(2):159–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raichle ME. Two views of brain function. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010;14(4):180–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Raichle ME. The restless brain: how intrinsic activity organizes brain function. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1668):20140172.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raichle ME, Mintun MA. Brain work and brain imaging. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:449–76.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Sebastian V. New directions in understanding the decision-making process: neuroeconomics and neuromarketing. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;127:758–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer T, Lamm C. The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1156:81–96.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Steffens MC. Is the implicit association test immune to faking? Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;51(3):165–79.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Stikic M, Berka C, Korszen S. Neuroenhancement in tasks, roles, and occupations. In: Waldman DA, Balthazard PA, editors. Organizational neuroscience. London: Emerald; 2015. p. 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thakor NV, Tong S. Advances in quantitative electroencephalogram analysis methods. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004;6:453–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Verbeke WJ, Rietdijk WJ, van den Berg WE, Dietvorst RC, Worm L, Bagozzi RP. The making of the Machiavellian brain: a structural MRI analysis. J Neurosci Psychol Econ. 2011;4(4):205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waldman DA, Balthazard PA, Peterson SJ. Leadership and neuroscience: can we revolutionize the way that inspirational leaders are identified and developed? Acad Manag Perspect. 2011;25(1):60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waldman DA, Balthazard PA, Peterson SJ. Conclusions and a look forward. In: Waldman DA, Balthazard PA, editors. Organizational neuroscience. London: Emerald; 2015. p. 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Waldman DA, Wang D, Hannah ST, Balthazard PA. A neurological and ideological perspective of ethical leadership. Acad Manag J. 2017a;60(4):1285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Waldman DA, Ward M, Becker WJ. Neuroscience in organizational behavior. Annu Rev Organ Psych Organ Behav. 2017b;4:425–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weisberg DS, Keil FC, Goodstein J, Rawson E, Gray JR. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20(3):470–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, Kahn JP, Cho MK, Clayton EW, Fletcher JG, Georgieff MK, Hammerschmidt D, Hudson K, Illes J. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36(2):219–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zotev V, Phillips R, Young KD, Drevets WC, Bodurka J. Prefrontal control of the amygdala during real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of emotion regulation. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.W. P. Carey School of BusinessArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations