Responsibility and Accountability in the Governance of Civilian UAV for Crop Insurance Applications in India

  • Anjan Chamuah
  • Rajbeer Singh


In an attempt to govern civilian unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for crop insurance applications, the paper is considering the risk and challenges associated with the emerging technology to be deployed in Indian agriculture, which is again highly diversified with varied physical features and socio-cultural practices of the agriculture community. These issues of governance concerning accountability and responsibility of actors and institutions are leading research problems of the study and would be addressed as research questions – How are the challenges of governance of civilian UAV innovations in crop insurance application can be addressed? How can the responsibility and accountability of the actors ensure effective governance? As such, the paper draws empirical results from in-depth interviews carried out as a part of the primary survey based on snowball sampling technique. Accordingly, the paper advances in adhering to the responsible deployment of the technology and ushering accountability in governance to enhance civil UAV innovations in the crop insurance application. Besides, institutional arrangements which help proper regulations of the technology, upholding values such as transparency, trust, privacy, effectiveness and efficiency can enhance an effective governance structure for civil UAV innovations in crop insurance applications.


Civilian UAV Governance Accountability Responsibility Innovation 


  1. Ahrens J (2002) Governance and the implementation of technology policy in less developed countries. Econ Innov New Technol 11(4–5):441–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aurora RS, Rachuri S (2016) Crop insurance. Int J Recent Res Asp 3(2):32–36Google Scholar
  3. Axelsson R, Angelstam P, Degerman E, Teitelbaum S, Andersson K, Elbakidze M, Drotz MK (2013) Social and cultural sustainability: criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning. Ambio 42(2):215–228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blyenburgh PV (1999) UAVs: an Overview. Air Space Eur I(5/6):43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryson JM (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter: stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Manag Rev 6(1):21–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Devaney L (2016) Good governance? Perceptions of accountability, transparency and effectiveness in Irish food risk governance. Food Policy 62:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DGCA (2016) DGCA-Civil_UAS (draft April 2016). Circular XX. Director General of Civil Aviation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  8. DGCA (2018) Civil Aviation Requirements. Office Of the Director General of Civil Aviation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Dudovskiy J (n.d.) Snowball sampling. Research-Methodology (blog) Accessed 22 Oct 2018.
  10. Finn RL, Wright D (2012) Unmanned aircraft systems: surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications. Comput Law Secur Rev 28(2):184–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garg RG (2016) Insuring Indian farmers more effectively – ICT update. April 18, 2016.
  12. Giddens A (1999) Risk and responsibility. Mod Law Rev 62(1):1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez WJ (2015) New perspectives on technology, values, and ethics: theoretical and practical. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guston DH (2012) The pumpkin or the Tiger? Michael Polanyi, Frederick Soddy, and anticipating emerging technologies. Minerva 50(3):363–379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoven Van D, Vermaas J, Poel IV (2015) Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design – sources, theory, values and application domains|Jeroen van Den Hoven | Springer. 2015.
  16. ICAO (2005) Global air traffic management operational concept. International Civil Aviation Organization.[1].pdf
  17. Jepson P (2005) Governance and accountability of environmental NGOs. Environ Sci Pol 8(5):515–524. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee RG, Petts J (2013) Adaptive governance for responsible innovation. In: Responsible innovation. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 143–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lelea, Margareta Amy, Universität Kassel, and Wissenschaftliche Betriebseinheit Tropenzentrum (2014) Methodologies for stakeholder analysis for application in transdisciplinary research projects focusing on actors in food supply chains: reload reducing losses adding value. DITSL, WitzenhausenGoogle Scholar
  20. Malerba F (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res Policy 18:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mishra S, Singh R (2018) Responsible innovation: a new approach to address the theoretical gaps for innovating in emerging E-mobility sector. In: Ferri F, Dwyer N, Raicevich S, Grifoni P, Altiok H, Andersen HT, Laouris Y, Silvestri C (eds) Governance and sustainability of responsible research and innovation processes: cases and experiences, Springer briefs in research and innovation governance. Springer, Cham, pp 93–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mobegi VO, Kaburi SN, Kombo A, Achuti DM, Matoke DA, Ombasa BB, Sewe Dr T (2012) Influence of new technology on financial performance; a case of small scale tea industry in Kebirigo, Kenya. 1(6):19Google Scholar
  23. Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J, Jawhar I, Idries A, Mohammed F (2018) Unmanned aerial vehicles applications in future smart cities. Technol Forecast Soc Chang.
  24. Nordmann A (2014) Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation. J Res Innov 1(1):87–98. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Owen R (2013) In: Bessant JR, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parsai G (2015) Drones to help gauge crop damage – NATIONAL – The Hindu. October 6, 2015.
  28. Pellizzoni L (2004) Responsibility and environmental governance. Environ Polit 13(3):541–565. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pennock JR (1952) Responsiveness, responsibility, and majority rule. Am Polit Sci Rev 46(3):790–807. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peterson ME (2006) The UAV and the current and future regulatory construct for integration into the National Airspace System. J Air Law Commer 71:521–614Google Scholar
  31. Rotolo D, Hicks D, Martin BR (2015) What is an emerging technology? Res Policy 44(10):1827–1843. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salerno MS, de Vasconcelos Gomes LA, da Silva DO, Bagno RB, Freitas SLTU (2015) Innovation processes: which process for which project? Technovation 35:59–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Setiawan AD, Singh R (2015) Responsible innovation in practice: the adoption of solar PV in telecom towers in Indonesia. In: Koops B-J, Oosterlaken I, Romijn H, Swierstra T, van den Hoven J (eds) Responsible innovation 2. Springer, Cham, pp 225–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siebert S, Teizer J (2013) Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). In: Montreal, Canada.
  35. Sinha JP, Kushwaha HL, Kushwaha D, Singh N, Purushottam M (2016) Prospect of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Technology for Agricultural Production Management. In: IIT Kharagpur: Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, IIT KharagpurGoogle Scholar
  36. Stoker G (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions. Int Soc Sci J 50(155):17–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swierstra T, Jelsma J (2006) Responsibility without moralism in technoscientific design practice. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(3):309–332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Valavanis KP (ed) (2007) Advances in unmanned aerial vehicles: state of the art and the road to autonomy, International series on intelligent systems, control and automation: science and engineering, vol 33. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  39. van Oudheusden M (2014) Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. J Res Innov 1(1):67–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, pp 51–74Google Scholar
  41. Xiang H, Tian L (2011) Development of a low-cost agricultural remote sensing system based on an Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Biosyst Eng 108(2):174–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zahinos A, Singh R, González-Benítez M (2013) Moving toward responsible innovation approach in the automotive industry: The SEAT Case 9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anjan Chamuah
    • 1
  • Rajbeer Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Studies in Science Policy, School of Social SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Technical University EindhovenEindhovenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations