Advertisement

The Conditions and Constituents of Well-being: Overlapping Values

  • Annie AustinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Wellbeing in Politics and Policy book series (WPP)

Abstract

The question of what it means to live a good life is an ancient one. During the same historical era as the ancient Greeks were working on Socrates’ question of what makes a good life, thinkers in other parts of the world were also asking the same thing; for example, Confucius in China, and the Vedic philosophers in India. The Socratic question has continued to occupy the minds of thinkers throughout the ages, and has become an increasingly important part of modern politics and policy. This chapter shows the areas of overlap among accounts of well-being across the ages. First, the parallels between ancient Greek, Confucian, and Hindu ethical frameworks of the good life are discussed. Next, a selection of modern political philosophies of the good are mined for candidate universals. The chapter shows that thinkers across time, geography, tradition and culture have found reason to value certain aspects of human life. These aspects are Social relationships, Work, Leisure, Education, Health (physical and psychological), Aesthetic experience, and Integrity (also known as “Authentic self-direction”). These more detailed accounts add content to the three basic values identified in Chapter  2: Happiness (from Hedonism); Freedom (from Liberalism); and Sociality (from Aristotelianism).

Keywords

Well-being Integrity Happiness 

References

  1. Chakraborty, D. (2006). Is an Indian ethics of virtue possible? Journal of Human Values, 12(1), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chappell, T. (Ed.). (2006). Values and Virtues: Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
  3. Cleary, T. (1992). Introduction. In T. Cleary (Trans.), The Essential Confucius (pp. 1–11). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  4. Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  5. Goldie, P. (2007). Dramatic irony, narrative, and the external perspective. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 60, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gomez-Lobo, A. (2002). Morality and the Human Goods: An Introduction to Natural Law Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hacker, P. (2006). Dharma in Hinduism. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 34(5), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang, C. (Ed.). (1997). The analects of Confucius. Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
  9. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Parekh, B. C. (1989). Gandhi’s Political Philosophy: A Critical Examination. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sharma, D. S. (2014). Hindu values. Asian Values: Encounter with Diversity, 106.Google Scholar
  12. Tan, S. H. (2003). Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  13. Yao, H. C., & Yao, X. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations