The Golden Jubilee of the Mauritian Bill of Rights: A Milestone to Celebrate or Time for Reflections?

  • Ashwanee BudooEmail author
  • Roopanand Amar Mahadew


The Mauritian Bill of Rights, that has ensured that the country has good human rights records, celebrated its golden jubilee in March 2018. This milestone provided an opportunity for reflections on its contents. This chapter elaborates on some key provisions that have extensively ensured human rights protection of Mauritian citizens. It then critically assesses the contents of the Bill of Rights with the view of underlining the limitations of the document to ensure the maximum protection of the human rights of Mauritian citizens. It proposes reforms such as redefining some civil and political rights, the inclusion of economic, social and cultural rights, the inclusion of actio popularis and a shift from dualist to monist state.



  1. Meetarbhan, Milan. Constitutional Law of Mauritius: Constitution of Mauritius with Commentaries. Mauritius: Milan JN Meetarbhan, 2016.Google Scholar
  2. Pope-Hennessy, James. Verandah: Some Episodes in the Crown Colonies (1867–1889). London: Allen and Unwin, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Sachs, Albie. The Strange Alchemy of Life and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. Twain, Mark. Following the Equator: A Journey Around the World. Hartford, CT: The American Publishing Company, 1897.Google Scholar

Chapters in Books

  1. Budoo, Ashwanee, and Nora Ho Tu Nam. “The Republic of Mauritius.” In Oxford Constitutions of the World, edited by Institute for International and Comparative Law in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  2. Mahadew, Roopanand. “The Best Loser System in Mauritius: An Essential Tool for Representing Political Minorities.” In Constitution-Building in Africa, edited by Jaap de Visser, Nico Steytler, Derek Powell, and Ebenezer Durojaye. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Journal articles

  1. Astley, Matthew. “Attaining Locus standi as a Private Party in Judicial Review Proceedings in European Community Law: A Virtually Impossible Task?” Diffusion: The UCLan Journal of Undergraduate Research 2, no. 2 (2009): 1–20.Google Scholar
  2. de Smith, Stanley A. “Mauritius: Constitutionalism in a Plural Society.” The Modern Law Review 31, no. 6 (1968): 601–622. CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Law Reform Commission. Constitution Protection of Human Rights. Mauritius, October 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Mo Ibrahim Foundation. 2017 Ibrahim Index of African Governance: Index Report. 2017.Google Scholar
  3. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone. Ottawa, ON: Lowe-Martin Group, 2016.Google Scholar


  1. European Court of Human RightsGoogle Scholar
  2. S and Marper v the United Kingdom 2008 European Court of Human Rights 1581Google Scholar
  3. Sahin v Turkey 2005 41 European Human Rights Reports 8Google Scholar
  4. Privy CouncilGoogle Scholar
  5. Matadeen v Pointu Privy Council Appeal No 14 of 1997Google Scholar
  6. The Society United Docks and Others v Government of Mauritius 1985 UKPC 42Google Scholar
  7. Darmalingum v The State 2000 United Kingdom Privy Council 30Google Scholar
  8. Roger F.P. de Boucherville v the State of Mauritius 2008 United Kingdom Privy Council 37Google Scholar
  9. Hurnam v The State 2005 United Kingdom Privy Council 49Google Scholar
  10. Mauritius Google Scholar
  11. Bhewa and Alladeen v Government of Mauritius & DPP 1990 MR 79Google Scholar
  12. Bhinkah v The State 2009 SCJ 102Google Scholar
  13. Bunwaree V K v La SentinelleGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahoo v State of Mauritius 2007 SCJ 156Google Scholar
  15. DPP v Boodhoo 1992 MR 284Google Scholar
  16. DPP v Jagdawoo 2016 SCJ 100Google Scholar
  17. Ex Parte Hurnam Devendranath, a Barrister-at-Law 2007 SCJ 289Google Scholar
  18. Jaulim v DPP 1976 MR 96Google Scholar
  19. Jordan v Jordan 2000 SCJ 226Google Scholar
  20. Jugnauth P K v The Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service Affairs &Ors 2013 SCJ 132Google Scholar
  21. Madhewoo v The State 2015 SCJ 177Google Scholar
  22. Mahboob v The Government of Mauritius 1982 MR 135Google Scholar
  23. Matadeen v Pointu 1998 MR 172Google Scholar
  24. Noordally v The Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions 1986 MR 220/SCJ 339Google Scholar
  25. Ohsan-Bellepeau v La Sentinelle 2009 SCJ 114Google Scholar
  26. Peerbocus v R 1991 MR 90Google Scholar
  27. Philibert v The State 2007 SCJ 274Google Scholar
  28. Pulluck v Ramphul 2005 SCJ 196Google Scholar
  29. Tengur v Minister of Education and Scientific Research and Another 2002 MR 166/SCJ 48Google Scholar
  30. The Union of Campement Sites Owners and Lessees v The Government of Mauritius 1984 MR 100Google Scholar
  31. Virahsawmy and Anor v The Commissioner of Police 1972 SCJ 169Google Scholar

Concluding Observations

  1. Human Rights Committee’s Concluding Observations on the Fifth Periodic Report of Mauritius Adopted on 11 December 2017 CCPR/C/MUS/CO/5.Google Scholar
  2. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Concluding Observation UN Doc. E/C.12/MUS/CO/4, 3–21 May 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of MauritiusMokaMauritius

Personalised recommendations