Advertisement

Coefficient of Flow Rate of Inlet Cylindrical Nozzles with Lateral Orthogonal Inflow

  • V. V. CherniukEmail author
  • V. V. Ivaniv
  • I. V. Bihun
  • Ja. M. Wojtowicz
Conference paper
  • 296 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 47)

Abstract

Cylindrical nozzles each of which has a lateral orthogonal inlet of fluid into it we recommend to apply in pressure distributive pipelines. By means of rotating these nozzles about their longitudinal axes, we can change the values of the angles \( \beta \) between the direction of the flow of fluid inside the distribution pipeline and the direction of the inflowing into the nozzle stream. The coefficient μ of flow rate through the nozzle with lateral orthogonal inlet is a function of the angle β. By means of changing the angles β, we regulate the non-uniformity of fluid dispensation from the pipeline along the path. It is experimentally established that the values of the coefficient μ for such nozzles depend on the angle β, on the squared ratio \( (d/D)^{2} \) of the cross-section area of the nozzle d to the cross-section area of the distributive pipeline D, as well as on Reynolds’ criterion Re which is calculated for the water stream in the nozzle. As operating fluid, we used water. The angles β were assigned the following values: 0, 45, 90, 135, and 180°. In the experiments, we used the distributive pipelines whose diameters D were equal to 11.28; 16.13; 20.18; 26.01 mm. The diameters d of the nozzles were 4.83; 6.01; 8.02; 8.99 mm. ratios (d/D)2 of cross-section areas were 0.0887; 0.119; 0.158; 0.183; 0.251. The greatest values of the coefficient μ of flow rate of the nozzles were obtained for β = 0°; the least for β = 90°. The greatest range of regulation of flow capacity (throughput) of nozzles has been obtained for (d/D)2 = 0.251; the values of μ variated by 23%.

Keywords

Cylindrical nozzles Coefficient of flow rate of nozzle 

References

  1. Chen AW, Sparrow EM (2009a) Turbulence modelling for flow in a distribution manifold. Int J Heat Mass Transf 5–6:1573–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen AW, Sparrow EM (2009b) Effect of exit-port geometry on the performance of a flow distribution manifold. Appl Therm Eng 13:2689–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cherniuk VV, Ivaniv VV (2017) Patent for invention № 115840 of Ukraine, IPC G05D 7/00, F17D 1/02, F17D 1/08. State Patent Office of Ukraine, Kyiv (in Ukraine)Google Scholar
  4. Hassan JM, Mohamed TA, Mohammed WS, Alawee WH (2014) Modeling the uniformity of manifold with various configurations. J Fluids Vol Article ID 325259, 8 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/325259
  5. Kim N, Byun H (2013) Effect of inlet configuration on upward branching of two-phase refrigerant in a parallel flow heat exchanger. Int J Refrig 36(3):1062–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Povkh IL, Chernyuk VV (1986) Experimental investigation of the influence of polyacrylamide admixtures on the resistance of diffusers. Eng-Phys J 51(3):357–361 (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Povkh IL, Chernyuk VV (1989) Resistance of confusors in turbulent flow of water with additives of poliakrilamide. Eng-Phys J 57(5):709–712 (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Abubakar SS (1977) Factors affecting orifice discharge in a multi-outlet irrigation pipe. A Master’s thesis. Manhattan, Kansas, pp 1–84Google Scholar
  9. Lee S, Moon N, Lee J (2012) A study on the exit flow characteristics by the orifice configuration of multi-perforated tubes. J Mech Sci Technol 26(9):2751–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zemlyanaya NV, Gulyakin AV (2017) Analysis of causes of non-uniform flow distribution in manifold systems with variable flow rate along length. In: International conference on construction, architecture and technosphere safety. Held at the Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Far Eastern Federal University, 22–23 September 2017. IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 262, pp 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zemlianaia NV, Gulyakin AV (2018) Parametrization of the water distribution process in perforated pipelines. Bull Sch Eng Far East Fed Univ 2(35):77–85. www.dvfu.ru/en/vestnikis (in Russian)
  12. Wang CC, Yang KS, Tsai JS, Chen IY (2011) Characteristics of flow distribution in compact parallel flow heat exchangers, part II: modified inlet header. Appl Therm Eng 31(16):3235–3242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zeng D, Pan M, Tang Y (2012) Qualitative investigation on effects of manifold shape on methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production. Renew Energy 39(1):313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Cherniuk
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • V. V. Ivaniv
    • 1
  • I. V. Bihun
    • 1
  • Ja. M. Wojtowicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hydraulics and Sanitary EngineeringLviv Polytechnic National UniversityLvivUkraine
  2. 2.Catholics University of Lublin named after John Paul IILublinPoland

Personalised recommendations