Advertisement

Cohesion of Slurry Surfacing Mix with Slow Setting Bitumen Emulsions

  • Iurii SidunEmail author
  • Oleksiy Vollis
  • Serhiy Solodkyy
  • Volodymyr Gunka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 47)

Abstract

In the present scientific work there is done the comparative analysis of two Slurry Surfacing mixes – systems on orthophosphoric and hydrochloric acids. It was determined that application of orthophosphoric acid for preparation of bitumen emulsion on oxidized bitumen leads to the substantial improvement of cohesion strength build-up rate – in comparison with identical system on hydrochloric acid. So as to receive the similar indices of cohesion strength build-up – the orthophosphoric-acid-based system allows using less amount of bitumen emulsion than required amount for the system on hydrochloric acid.

The results received witness about the different natures of breakage and cohesion strength build-up rate for systems on hydrochloric and phosphoric acids. As a confirmation of this fact there can be considered the possibility of using (in the systems with orthophosphoric acid) the aggregates which by methylene blue criterion are unsuitable for such technologies.

The orthophosphoric-acid-based Slurry Surfacing mix systems’ properties obtained allow forecasting the substantial advantages of using these mixes at limit-permissible (for bitumen-emulsion technologies) ambient temperatures.

Keywords

Cohesive strength Slurry-surfacing mix Slurry Seal Bitumen emulsion Hydrochloric and orthophosphoric acids 

References

  1. AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry (2013) Asphalt concrete issues. Information Bulletin of Department «Additives for road construction» . Redipave System for rapid-setting Slurry-Seal pavement on arbitrary bitumen. Europe, Middle East, India and Africa 84Google Scholar
  2. Bhargava N, Siddagangaiah A, Ryntathiang TL (2019) State of the art review on design and performance of microsurfacing. Road Mater Pavement Des 1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1607771
  3. Demchuk Y, Sidun I, Gunka V, Pyshyev S, Solodkyy S (2018) Effect of phenol-cresol-formaldehyde resin on adhesive and physic-mechanical properties of road bitumen. Chem Chem Technol 12:456–461.  https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht12.04.456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EN 12274-4 Slurry Surfacing (2018) Test methods: European Standard EN 12274-4. Part 4: determination of cohesion of the mix. European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  5. EN 12591:2009 (2009) Bitumen and bituminous binders. Specifications for paving fraction bitumensGoogle Scholar
  6. Gujar R, Vakharia V (2019) Prediction and validation of alternative fillers used in micro surfacing mix-design using machine learning techniques. Constr Build Mater 207:519–527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hou S, Chen C, Zhang J, Shen H, Gu F (2018) Thermal and mechanical evaluations of asphalt emulsions and mixtures for microsurfacing. Constr Build Mater 191:1221–1229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ISSA A105 (2010) Recommended performance guidelines for emulsified asphalt slurry seal. International Slurry Surfacing Association, Annapolis, MD. 2010 RevisedGoogle Scholar
  9. James A (1998) Asphalt emulsions (chemistry and concepts). In: 2nd Asphalt technology conference of the Americas, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  10. Nykypanchuk M, Hrynchuk Y, Olchovyk M (2013) Effect of modified bitumen on physic-mechanical properties of asphalt concrete. Chem Chem Technol 7(4):467–470.  https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht07.04.467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Poursoltani M, Hesami S, (2018) Performance evaluation of microsurfacing mixture containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Int J Pavement Eng. 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1551544
  12. Pyshyev S, Grytsenko Y, Solodkyy S, Sidun I, Vollis O (2015) Using bitumen emulsions based on oxidized, distillation and modified oxidized bitumens for slurry seal production. Chem Chem Technol 9(3):359–366.  https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht09.03.359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sobol K, Blikharskyy Z, Petrovska N, Terlyha V (2014) Analysis of structure formation peculiarities during hydration of oil-well cement with zeolitic tuff and metakaolin additives. Chem Chem Technol 8:461–465.  https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht08.04.461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Solodkyy S, Markiv T, Sobol K, Hunyak O (2017) Fracture properties of high-strength concrete obtained by direct modification of structure. MATEC Web Conf 116.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711601016. Transbud-2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Takamura K, James A (2015) Paving with asphalt emulsions. Adv Asph Mater Road Pavement Constr 393–426Google Scholar
  16. TB139 Test Method to Classify Emulsified Asphalt (1990) Aggregate mixture systems by modified cohesion tester measurement of set and cure characteristics. International Slurry Surfacing AssociationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iurii Sidun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Oleksiy Vollis
    • 2
  • Serhiy Solodkyy
    • 1
  • Volodymyr Gunka
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Building and Environmental EngineeringLviv Polytechnic National UniversityLvivUkraine
  2. 2.Private Enterprise «Laboratory WestRoadServices»LvivUkraine
  3. 3.Institute of Chemistry and Chemical TechnologyLviv Polytechnic National UniversityLvivUkraine

Personalised recommendations