Advertisement

Learning Languaging Matters. Contributions to a Turn-on-Turn Reflexivity

  • Sangeeta Bagga-GuptaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 39)

Abstract

Ideas encapsulated in the “Linguistic-Turn” drew attention away from mental experiences towards linguistic behavior. Many newer (often overlapping) turn-positions, such as the complexity-, colonial-, mobility-, multilingual-, social-, including my work on the boundary-turn, take cognizance of the role of language in (re)presenting and (co)creating realities. Drawing inspiration from peripheral Southern framings, this chapter highlights a dual-gap regarding conceptualizations of language and learning and the paucity of scholarship that empirically explores the performance of language, in particular from peripheral perspectives. This chapter thus makes visible the marginal engagement with alternative discussions on (re)presentational issues, including the limited focus on how (re)presentations themselves (co)create specific ways of understanding what language is, where, when, why and for whom it exists. Drawing inspiration from turn-positions, the pitfalls and strengths of current ways in which conceptualizations in the language domain contribute to issues of learning in a globalized world are highlighted. Drawing upon sociocultural theories of communication and learning and decolonial framings of communication and identity, salient findings (from previous empirical studies) of performative ways-of-being-with-words or languaging in social practices are contrasted with the ways in which language is itself conceptualized in educational arenas.

Keywords

Linguistic-turn Boundary-turn Learning Southern Languaging Decolonial Performatory 

References

  1. Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aman, R. (2014). Impossible interculturality? Education and the colonial difference in a multicultural world. Doctoral dissertation, Linköping studies in behavioral science 182. Linköping University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2002). Explorations in bilingual instructional interaction: A sociocultural perspective on literacy. Journal of the European Association on Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 557–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2004). Visually oriented bilingualism. Discursive and technological resources in Swedish Deaf pedagogical arenas. In V. Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (eds) To the Lexicon and Beyond. Sociolinguistics in European Deaf Communities, Volume 10 – The Sociolingvistics in Deaf Communities Series. Editor C Lucas. (171-207). Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2012). Privileging identity positions and multimodal communication in textual practices: intersectionality and the (re)negotiation of boundaries. In A. Pitkänen-Huhta & L. Holm (Eds.) Literacy practices in transition: perspectives from the Nordic countries (75–100). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  7. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2013). The boundary-turn. Relocating language, identity and culture through the epistemological lenses of time, space and social interactions. In I. Hasnain, S. Bagga-Gupta, & S. Mohan (Eds.), Alternative voices: (re)searching language, culture and identity… (pp. 28–49). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017a). Going beyond oral-written-signed-virtual divides. Theorizing languaging from social practice perspectives. Special issue: Orality and literacy in the 21st century: Prospects for writing pedagogy. Writing and Pedagogy, 7(2), 49–75.  https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.27046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017b). Language and identity beyond the mainstream. Democratic and equity issues for and by whom, where, when and why. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 102–112.  https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017c). Languaging and isms of reinforced boundaries across settings: Multidisciplinary ethnographical explorations. In D. J. Rivers & K. Zotzmann (Eds.), Volume 11 series language and social life. ISMS of oppression in language education (pp. 203–229). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017d). Center-staging language and identity research from earthrise perspectives. Contextualizing performances in open spaces. In S. Bagga-Gupta, A. L. Hansen, & J. Feilberg (Eds.), Identity revisited and reimagined. Empirical and theoretical contributions on embodied communication across time and space (pp. 65–100). Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2019a). Languaging across time and space in educational contexts. Language Studies and Deaf Studies. Deafness and Education International, 21(2–3), 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2019.1594081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2019b). Identity positioning and languaging in deaf-hearing worlds: Some insights from studies of segregated and mainstream educational settings. In I. Leigh & C. O’Brien (Eds.), Deaf identities. Exploring new frontiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bagga-Gupta, S., & Messina Dahlberg, G. (2017). Mobilization of nomenclature in the language and diversity areas in learning and instruction. Paper at the invited symposium of SIG 21 at EARLI 2017, Education in the crossroads of economy and politics – Role of research in the advancement of public good. Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
  15. Bagga-Gupta, S., & Messina Dahlberg, G. (2018). Meaning-making or heterogeneity in the areas of language and identity? The case of translanguaging and nyanlända (newly-arrived) across time and space. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15, 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2018.1468446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bagga-Gupta, S., & Surian, A. (2014). Center-staging global north-south research in the glocal-virtual age: Challenges in researching and theorizing learning, communication and diversity. Paper at EARLI. Padova, Italy.Google Scholar
  17. Bagga-Gupta, S., Messina Dahlberg, G., & Gynne, A. (2019). Handling languaging during fieldwork, analysis and reporting in the 21st century. Aspects of ethnography as action in and across physical-virtual spaces. In S. Bagga-Gupta, G. M. Dahlberg, & Y. Lindberg (Eds.), Virtual sites as learning spaces. Critical issues on languaging research in changing eduscapes in the 21st century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Bailey Jones, R. (2011). Postcolonial representations of women. Critical issues for education. Rochester: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bakhtin, M. (1981). In C. Holmquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  20. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanistic performativity. Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Barth, F. (Ed.). (1994). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Oslo: Pensumtjeneste.Google Scholar
  22. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Blommaert, J. (2015). Commentary: Superdiversity old and new. Language and Communication, 44, 82–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Clark, C., Dyson, A., & Millward, A. (1998). Theorising special education: Time to move on! In C. Clark, A. Dyson, & A. Millward (Eds.), Theorising special education (pp. 156–173). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Clifford, J. (1986). Writing culture. The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Connell, R. (2011). Confronting equality. Gender, knowledge and global change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Connell, R. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory, 13(2), 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Deumert, A., & Mabandla, N. (2017). A luta continua – Black queer visibilities and philosophies of hospitality in a South African rural town. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 21(3), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dirksmeier, P., & Helbrecht, I. (2008). Time, non-representational theory and the “performative turn” – Towards a new methodology in qualitative social research [24 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), 55. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0802558.Google Scholar
  31. Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdiciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin/white masks. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  33. Finnegan, R. (2015). Where is language? An anthropologist’s questions on language, literature and performance. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  34. Gal, S., & Irvine, J. (1995). The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research, 62, 967–1001.Google Scholar
  35. Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science. Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science. Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gramling, D. (2016). The invention of monolingualism. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  38. Gunnarsson, L. (2015). Why we keep separating the ‘inseparable’: Dialecticizing intersectionality. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815577114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gynne, A. (2016). Languaging and social positioning in multilingual dchool practices: Studies of Sweden finish middle school years. Doctoral dissertation. Mälardalens studies in educational sciences 26. Mälardalens University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs “identity”? In P. du Gay & S. Hall (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 15–30). Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Heller, M. (Ed.). (2007). Bilingualism. A social approach. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Hjörne, E., & Säljö, R. (2013). Att platsa i en skola för alla – elevhälsa och förhandling om normalitet i den svenska skola, med samtalsguide [To fit into a school for all – Pupil health and neogiation of normality in the Swedish school]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  43. Hansen, A. (2005). Kommunikative praksiser i visuelt orienterte klasserom: En studie av et tilrettelagt opplegg for døve lærerstudenter. [Communication in visually oriented classrooms: a study of an adapted programme for Deaf teacher training students.]. PhD Thesis. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).Google Scholar
  44. Holmström, I. (2013). Learning by hearing’. Technological framings for participation. Örebro studies in education 42. Doctoral dissertation, Örebro University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  45. Hult, F. (2010). The complexity turn in educational linguistics. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23(3), 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jørgensen, J. N., Karrebæk, M., Madsen, L. M., & Møller, J. S. (2011). Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 23–37.Google Scholar
  47. Khubchandani, L. M. (1997). Revisualizing boundaries: A plurilingual ethos (Vol. 3). New Dehli: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Kraidy, M. M. (2005). Hybridity: Or the cultural logic of globalization. Philadelphia: Temple.Google Scholar
  49. Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Landri, P., & Neumann, E. (2014). Introduction. Mobile sociologies of education. European Educational Research Journal, 131, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Löwy, I. (1992). The strength of loose concepts – Boundary concepts, federative experimental strategies and disciplinary growth. The case of immunology. History of Science, 30, 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 240–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maldonado-Torres, N. (2011). Thinking through the decolonial turn: Post-continental interventions in theory, philosophy, and critique – An introduction. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 12, 1–15.Google Scholar
  56. May, S. (Ed.). (2014). The multilingual turn. Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 3(3), 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Messina Dahlberg, G. (2015). Languaging in virtual learning sites: Studies of online encounters in the language-focused classroom. Doctoral dissertation. Örebro studies in education 49. Örebro University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  59. Padden, C. (1996). Early Bilingual Lives of Deaf Children. In I Parasnis Ed Cultural and Language Diversity and the Deaf Experience. 99-116. New York, Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pavlenko, A. (2014). Superdiversity and why it isn’t. Reflections on terminological innovations and academic branding. Paper presented at the conference “Sloganizations in language education discourse”, Berlin.Google Scholar
  61. Pavlenko, A. (2018). Superdiversity and why it isn’t. Reflections on terminological innovations and academic branding. In B. Schmenk, S. Breidbach, & L. Küster (Eds.), Sloganizations in language education discourse (Conceptual thinking in the age of academic marketization). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  62. Pietikäinen, S., Kelly-Holmes, H., Jaffe, A., & Coupland, N. (2016). Sociolinguistics from the periphery. Small languages in new circumstances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rorty, R. (2007). Wittgenstein and the Linguistic Turn. In From ontos verlag Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Willgenstein Society – New Series (Volumes 1–18) http://wab.uib.no/agora-ontos/. Republication by the Wittgenstein Archives, University of Bergen, 2013. Original: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society – New Series, Volume 3: Cultures. Conflict – Analysis – Dialogue Christian Kanzian and Edmund Runggaldier (eds). Heusenstamm: ontos verlag. 3–19.
  64. Rosén, J. (2013). Svenska för invandrarskap?: Språk, kategorisering och identitet inom utbildningsformen Svenska för invandrare. [Swedish for immigrantness?: Language, categorization and identity within the education Swedish for immigrants]. Örebro studies in educational sciences with an emphasis on didactics, 7. Doctoral dissertation, Örebro University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  65. Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande och kulturella redskap: om lärprocesser och det kollektiva minnet. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  66. Säljö, R. (2009). Learning, theories of learning, and units of analysis in research. Educational Psychology, 44(3), 202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sataøen, H. L. (2016). Transforming the “third mission” in Norwegian higher education institutions: A boundary object theory approach. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 52–67.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1212253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Urry, J. (2005). The complexity turn. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(5), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain. Centre of Migration, Policy and Society (Working Paper No. 25). Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  71. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and CommunicationJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations