The Anatomy of Learning a Foreign Language in Classroom with a Textbook: An Interactional and Multimodal Approach
From the perspective of an ethnomethodological (Garfinkel H, Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Prentice-Hall, 1967) approach of learning (Nishizaka A, Res Lang Soc Interact 39:119–154, 2006; Berducci D, Pragmat Cogn 19:476–506, 2011) and of a conversation analytic and multimodal approach of writing (Mondada L, Svinhufvud K, Language and Dialog 6:1–53, 2016), this chapter proposes to reconceptualise the connections between language, learning and literacy by examining their temporal and multimodal dimensions in social interaction. I focus on the case of the interactional processes through which a teacher and students teach and learn a foreign language with a textbook. Examination of the interactional processes specific to foreign language learning in the classroom presents two heuristic interests: (1) to show that within social interaction, practices such as talking, listening, reading and writing, are not strictly separated but are embedded within a single course of action. (2) observation of how participants articulate these practices within their interaction reflexively indicates how they organize the teaching/learning of a foreign language in an institutional setting.
KeywordsConversation analysis Ethnomethodology L2 learning Classroom interaction Multimodality Writing Reading French Japanese
- Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). http://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages. Accessed 27 Sept 2017.
- Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Structures of social action studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lerner, G. H. (2002). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Luke, C., De Castell, S., & Luke, A. (1989). Beyond criticism: The authority of the schoolbook. In S. De Castell, A. Luke, & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority and criticism (pp. 245–260). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Mondada, L. (2001–2014). Conventions for multimodal transcription. https://franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2018.
- Mondada, L. (2013). Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-interaction. In P. Auer, M. Hilpert, A. Stukenbrock, & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Space in language and linguistics: Geographical, interactional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 247–275). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In G. Rod & W. Johannes (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 346–380). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Seedhouse, P. (2013). Conversation analysis and classroom interaction. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 954–958). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. (1985). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Palo Alto: Palo Alto Research Center.Google Scholar
- Weinbrenner, P. (1992). Methodologies of textbook analysis used to date. In H. Bourdillon (Ed.), History and social studies – Methodologies of textbook analysis (pp. 21–34). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar