Advertisement

On Epistemological Issues in Technologically Infused Spaces: Notes on Virtual Sites for Learning

  • Sangeeta Bagga-GuptaEmail author
  • Giulia Messina Dahlberg
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses upon the omnipresent nature of learning across arenas that are glossed as virtual/digital/online and physical/analogue/offline. It analytically argues for the need to go beyond the normative taken-for-granted nature of the affordances of digitalization in education—both as far as learning is concerned and issues of inclusion, access and participation. This chapter highlights people’s technologically infused contemporary lives—at least as these play out in global-North spaces—and the conceptual challenges involved in studying such an existence.

Keywords

Social action Analogue-physical spaces Learning Participation Many-ways-of-being Performativity Languaging Digitalization Technology-as-educational-panacea 

References

  1. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2013). The boundary-turn. Relocating language, identity and culture through the epistemological lenses of time, space and social interactions. In I. Hasnain, S. Bagga-Gupta, & S. Mohan (Eds.), Alternative voices: (Re)searching language, culture & identity (pp. 28–49). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017a). Language and Identity Beyond the Mainstream. Democratic and Equity Issues For and By Whom, Where, When and Why. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 102–112.  https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017b). Languaging and Isms of Reinforced Boundaries Across Settings: Multidisciplinary Ethnographical Explorations. In D. J. Rivers & K. Zotzmann (Eds.), Volume 11 Series Language and Social Life. -Isms of Oppression in Language Education (pp. 203–229). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2019a). Learning Languaging Matters. Contributions to a Turn-on-Turn Reflexivity. In S. Bagga-Gupta, A. Golden, L. Holm, H. P. Laursen, & A. Pitkänen-Huhta (Eds.), Reconceptualizing Connections Between Language, Literacy and Learning. Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2019b). Languaging Across Time and Space in Educational Contexts. Language Studies and Deaf Studies. Deafness & Education International, 21(2), 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2019.1594081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagga-Gupta, S. (in press). Identity Positioning and Languaging in Deaf-Hearing Worlds: Some Insights from Studies of Segregated and Mainstream Educational Settings. In I. Leigh & C. O’Brien (Eds.), Deaf Identities. Exploring New Frontiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bagga-Gupta, S., Feilberg, J., & Hansen, A. L. (2017). Many-Ways-of-Being Across Sites. Identity as (Inter)Action. In S. Bagga-Gupta, A. L. Hansen, & J. Feilberg (Eds.), Identity Revisited and Reimagined. Empirical and Theoretical Contributions on Embodied Communication Across Time and Space (pp. 5–23). Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bagga-Gupta, S., & Messina Dahlberg, G. (2018). On the Quest to “Go Beyond” a Bounded View of Language. Research in the Intersections of the Educational Sciences, Language Studies and Deaf Studies Domains 1997–2018. Deafness & Education International, 21(2–3), 74–98.Google Scholar
  9. Bagga-Gupta, S., Messina Dahlberg, G., & Winther, Y. (2016). Disabling and Enabling Technologies for Learning in Higher Education for All: Issues and Challenges for Whom? Informatics, 3(4).Google Scholar
  10. Bagga-Gupta, S., & Rao, A. (2018). Languaging in Digital Global South-North Spaces in the Twenty-First Century: Media, Language and Identity in Political Discourse. Bandung: Journal of the Global South, 5(3), 1–34. Retrieved from https://rdcu.be/NbDkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bliss, J., & Säljö, R. (1999). The Human-Technological Dialectic. In J. Bliss & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning Sites: Social and Technological Resources for Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  12. Blommaert, J. (2008). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. boyd, d. (2007). None of This Is Real. In J. Karaganis (Ed.), Structures of Participation in Digital Culture (pp. 132–157). New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
  14. Brinkmann, S. (2005). Human Kinds and Looping Effects in Psychology. Foucauldian and Hermeneutic Perspectives. Theory and Psychology, 15(6), 769–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castells, M. (2005). The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy. In M. Castells & G. Cardoso (Eds.), The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: John Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.Google Scholar
  16. Cole, M., & Derry, J. (2005). We Have Met Technology and It Is Us. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and Technology. The Impact of Tools on the Nature and Development of Human Abilities (pp. 209–227). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Cousin, G. (2005). Learning from Cyberspace. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Education in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A Transdisciplinary Framework for SLA in a Multilingual World. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edwards, R. (2012). (Im)Mobilities and (Dis)Locating Practices in Cyber-Education. In R. Brooks, A. Fuller, & J. Waters (Eds.), Changing Spaces of Education. New Perspectives on the Nature of Learning (pp. 2015–2218). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Engeström, Y. (2007). From Communities of Practice to Mycorrhizae. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of Practice: Critical Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Erixon, P.-O. (2010). School Subject Paradigms and Teaching Practice in Primary and Lower Secondary Swedish Schools Influenced by ICT and Media. Computers and Education, 54, 1212–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  24. Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism. Four essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hacking, I. (1995). The Looping Effect of Human Kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate (pp. 351–383). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  26. Hampton, K. (2010). Internet Use and the Concentration of Disadvantage: Glocalization and the Urban Underclass. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1111–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ito, M. (2008). Introduction. In K. Varnelis (Ed.), Networked Publics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in Classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  30. Lamy, M.-N., & Hampel, R. (2007). Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Landri, P., & Neumann, E. (2014). Mobile Sociologies of Education. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leander, K., Philips, N. C., & Taylor, H. (2010). The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping New Mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34, 329–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindberg, Y. (2013). De la Belle Époque à Second Life. Paris: Publibook.Google Scholar
  35. Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I., & Säljö, R. (2011). Learning Across Sites. New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Mahfujur, Abulmotaleb, Juan, & Mahfujur. (2008). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/23139617/Web_3.0_a_vision_for_bridging_the_gap_between_real_and_virtual
  37. Massey, D. (2004). Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  38. Messina Dahlberg, G., & Bagga-Gupta, G. (2015). Learning on-the-Go in Institutional Telecollaboration. Anthropological Perspectives on the Boundaries of Digital Spaces. In E. Dixon & M. Thomas (Eds.), Researching Language Learners Interaction Online: From Social Media to MOOCs (Vol. 13). CALICO.Google Scholar
  39. Messina Dahlberg, G., & Bagga-Gupta, S. (2019). On the Quest to “Go Beyond” a Bounded View of Language. Research in the Intersections of the Educational Sciences, Language Studies and Deaf Studies Domains 1997–2018. Deafness & Education International, 21(2), 74–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2018.1561782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ministry of Education. (1994). Ny Informationsteknologi i Undervisningen. Ds 1994:21. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  41. Nature. (2010). Editorial – Learning in the Wild, 464(7290), 813–814.Google Scholar
  42. Ortega, L. (in press). Foreword. In S. Bagga-Gupta, A. Golden, L. Holm, H. P. Laursen, & A. Pitkänen-Huhta (Eds.), Reconceptualizing Connections Between Language, Literacy and Learning. Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Phillips, F., Yu, C., Hameed, T., & El Akhdary, M. A. (2017). The Knowledge Society’s Origins and Current Trajectory. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(3), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Player-Koro, C., & Beach, D. (2014). ‘Roll-Out Neoliberalism’ Through One-to-One Laptop Investments in Swedish Schools. IRPPS Monografie, 75–84.Google Scholar
  45. Player-Koro, C., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Selling Tech to Teachers: Education Trade Shows as Policy Events. Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 682–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Resnick, M. (1994). Learning About Life. Artificial Life, 1, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rogers, Y., & Marshall, P. (2017). Research in the Wild. New York: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development on Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Säljö, R. (2010). Digital Tools and Challenges to Institutional Traditions of Learning: Technologies, Social Memory and the Performative Nature of Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Selwyn, N. (2011). Editorial: In Praise of Pessimism – The Need for Negativity in Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Research, 42(2), 713–718.Google Scholar
  51. Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., Bulfin, S., & Johnson, N. (2017). Left to Their Own Devices: The Everyday Realities of ‘One-to-One’ Classrooms. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomas, S., Joseph, C., Laccetti, J., Mason, B., Mills, S., Perril, S., et al. (2007). Transliteracy: Crossing Divides. First Monday, 12(12). Retrieved from http://www.ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2060/1908
  53. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and CommunicationJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Education and Special EducationUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations