Advertisement

Public Attitude Toward Investment in Sustainable Cities in Taiwan

  • Meng-Fen Yen
  • Yuh-Yuh LiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate public attitude toward investment in sustainable infrastructure in Taiwan. We decomposed the value of sustainability development into three dimensions, namely, environmental, societal, and economic values, and then showed that there were relationships between public attitude toward investment in sustainable cities and these sub-values of sustainability development. To do so, we built scales to measure public attitude toward investment in sustainable infrastructure and these sub-values of sustainability development. We used a questionnaire to collect our data, interviewing 359 undergraduate students in June of 2018. Multiple regression models were then employed for statistical analysis. We first found that, after controlling for the students’ gender and majors, the public attitude toward sustainable cities in Taiwan was correlated with environmental value but only partially related to economic value. Meanwhile, the relationship between the public attitude toward investment in sustainable cities and societal value was trivial. Moreover, we also found that the economic, societal, and environmental values of sustainability development are not mutually exclusive concepts but, rather, are compatible with each other in the overall concept of sustainable city design. We concluded that investment in sustainable cities in Taiwan was regarded by the public as mainly contributing to environmental value. These findings provide a theoretical contribution to the literature of environmental psychology. Furthermore, the conclusions of the study have methodological and practical implications for countries and firms involved in the public infrastructure development of sustainable cities.

Keywords

Sustainable infrastructure Public attitude Sustainable cities Environmental psychology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by all of the participating science centers and Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant 106‐2511‐S‐110‐007.

References

  1. Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Ind 52:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulkeley H (2013) Cities and climate change. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Dietz T, Stern PC, Guagnano GA (1998) Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environ Behav 30:450–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falkena HJ, Moll HC, Noorman KJ (2002) Towards a sustainable city: roles, behaviour and attitudes of citizens, local organisations and the authorities. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 54Google Scholar
  6. Francois J, Manchin M (2013) Institutions, infrastructure, and trade. World Dev 46:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heberlein TA (2012) Navigating environmental attitudes. Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773329.001.0001
  8. Homer PM, Kahle LR (1988) A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(4):638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jabareen Y (2006) Sustainable urban forms: their typologies, models, and concepts. J Plann Educ Res 26(1):38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson CY, Bowker JM, Cordell HK (2004) Ethnic variation in environmental belief and behavior: an examination of the new ecological paradigm in a social psychological context. Environ Behav 36(2):157–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Judyta W (2016) Urban infrastructure facilities as an essential public investment for sustainable cities–indispensable but unwelcome objects of social conflicts. Case study of Warsaw, Poland. Transp Res Procedia 16:553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaiser FG, Fuhrer U (2003) Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Appl Psychol Int Rev 52(4):598–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krause RM, Feiock RC, Hawkins CV (2014) The administrative organization of sustainability within local government. J Public Adm Res Theor 26(1):113–127Google Scholar
  14. Lau LS, Choong CK, Ng CF (2018) Role of institutional quality on environmental Kuznets curve: a comparative study in developed and developing countries. In: Advances in pacific basin business, economics and finance. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 223–247Google Scholar
  15. Leiserowitz AA, Kates RW, Parris TM (2006) Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: a review of multinational and global trends. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:413–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levi D, Casswell R, Gonzales U, Lopez A (2010) Attitudes towards sustainable cities: are sustainable cities liable cities? Focus J City Reg Plann Dept 7(7):33–35Google Scholar
  17. Macnaghten P, Jacobs M (1997) Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation. Glob Environ Change 7(1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milfont TL, Duckitt J, Wagner C (2010) A cross-cultural test of the value–attitude–behavior hierarchy. J Appl Soc Psychol 40(11):2791–2813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Science for Environment Policy (2018) Indicators for sustainable cities. In-depth Report 12. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
  20. Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev:81–97Google Scholar
  22. Stern PC, Kalof L, Dietz T, Guagnano GA (1995) Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J Appl Soc Psychol 25:1611–1636.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stjernborg V, Mattisson O (2016) The role of public transport in society—a case study of general policy documents in Sweden. Sustainability 8(11):1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2013) Chapter III Towards sustainable cities. In: From world economic and social survey 2013: sustainable development challenges. United Nations, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang X, Hawkins C, Lebredo N, Berman E (2012) Capacity to sustain sustainability: a study of U.S. cases. Public Adm Rev 72:841–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yen M-F, Wu R, Miranda MJ (2019) A general equilibrium model of bilateral trade with strategic public investment in commercial infrastructure. J Int Trade Econ Dev 28(6):712–731Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Research in Econometric Theory and Applications (CRETA)National Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Research Center for Promoting Civic Literacy, National Sun Yat-sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations