Advertisement

From Sublime to Resentment: Emotional Trajectories When Watching Crime on TV

  • Oriana Binik
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is based on 15 interviews with viewers and a content analysis of 12 episodes of Quarto Grado, an Italian true-crime television show. An analysis of the two dimensions of the sublime (Chapter  2), shows that viewers feel a mix of attraction and repulsion for crime; they make contact with evil by identifying with victims, but identifying with criminals is also possible. The sublime is a social emotion: viewers usually learn how to recognise and manage this emotion from their families or from famous cold cases. The sublime is commodified via: the selection and contextualising of specific cases; the aestheticisation of violence; proximity; a mixture of reality and fiction and the uncertainty typical of cold cases. Do these emotions create social bonds? In the case of the TV show, the sublime, as a ‘bridge emotion’ shifts in the direction of a dangerous shared resentment.

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., & Yi, Y. (1999). The role of culture and gender in the relationship between positive and negative affect. Cognition and Emotion, 13(6), 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binik, O. (2015). The ideal and deserving victims of femicide in the Italian public debate: A study on the TV show “Quarto Grado”. Studi culturali, 12(3), 391412.Google Scholar
  3. Binik, O. (2017). L’arte del crimine tra liminale e liminoide. Il caso di Making a Murderer. Comunicazioni sociali, 2(2), 291–304.Google Scholar
  4. Calabi, C. (2013). Emozioni ambivalenti e contraddizioni. In C. Tappolet, et al. (Eds.), Le ombre dell’anima, pensare le emozioni negative. Milan: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar
  5. Ceretti, A. (2005). Il caso di Novi Ligure nella rappresentazione mediatica. In G. Forti (Ed.), La televisione del crimine. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
  6. Christie, N. (1986). The ideal victim: From crime policy to victim policy (pp. 17–30). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  8. Fiddler, M. (2013). Playing funny games in the last house on the left: The uncanny and the “home invasion” genre. Crime Media Culture, 9(3), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fistetti, F. (2014, August 24). La rinascita della Comunità. La lettura, Corriere della sera.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (2003). The Uncanny. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Garapon, A. (2001). Bien juger: essai sur le rituel judiciaire. Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  12. Garland, D. (2012). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Giglioli, D. (2014). Critica della vittima. Un esperimento con l’etica. Rome: Nottetempo.Google Scholar
  14. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Oxford: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  15. Grauerholz, E., & Scuteri, G. M. (1989). Learning to role-take: A teaching technique to enhance awareness of the “other”. Teaching Sociology, 17(4), 480–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, S. (1997). Introduction. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage and Open University.Google Scholar
  17. Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Oxford and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jewkes, Y. (2011). Media & crime. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror. Columbia and Princeton: University Presses of California.Google Scholar
  22. Larsen, J. T., Hemenover, S. H., Norris, C. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003). Turning adversity to advantage: On the virtues of the coactivation of positive and negative emotions. In L. Aspinwall & U. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 211–225). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lipovetsky, G., & Serroy, J. (2013). L’esthétisation du monde. Vivre à l’âge du capitalisme artiste. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  24. Maffesoli, M. (1988). Le temps des tribus: le déclin de l’individualisme dans les sociétés de masse. Librairie des Méridiens.Google Scholar
  25. Massin, O. (2013). Gioie amare e dolci pene. In C. Tappolet, et al. (Eds.), Le ombre dell’anima, pensare le emozioni negative. Milan: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar
  26. McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Oatley, K. (1995). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oatley, K. (2004). From the emotions of conversation to the passions of fiction. In N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 98–115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearsall, P. (2007). Awe: The delights and dangers of our eleventh emotion. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications.Google Scholar
  30. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Charmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Reiner, R., Livingstone, S., & Allen, J. (2000). No more happy endings? The media and popular concern about crimesince the second world war. In T. Hope & R. Sparks (Eds.), Crime, risk and insecurity: Law and order in everyday life and political discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Rosenberg, M. (1990). Reflexivity and emotions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sandberg, S. (2013). Are self-narratives strategic or determined, unified or fragmented? Reading Breivik’s Manifesto in light of narrative criminology. Acta Sociologica, 56(1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thoits, P. A. (1989). The sociology of emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomelleri, S. (2009). Identità e gerarchia: per una sociologia del risentimento. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
  36. Walklate, S. (2007). Imagining the victim of crime. Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, P., & Aaker, J. L. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 636–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams, P., & Dickinson, J. (1993). Fear of crime: Read all about it? British Journal of Criminology, 33(1), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oriana Binik
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations