Advertisement

In the Cultural Criminology Hall of Mirrors

  • Oriana Binik
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the methodology I used for the research, which can be traced to cultural criminology. I used Griswold’s cultural diamond to present a model that connects the interactionist analysis of the sublime (Chapter  2) with the structures considered in Chapter  3 (the double metaphor of the carnival of crime). The premise is that emotions can be considered from a cultural perspective—in particular with Arlie Hochschild’s—and that qualitative techniques (interviews, content analysis, instant ethnography) are the best ways of exploring the four cases considered. The case studies are envisaged as a continuum: from practices considered legitimate, such as watching a true-crime television show, to the extreme of fanaticism for Anders Breivik, the perpetrator of a massacre. The chapter is enriched with excerpts from interviews or content analysis and images.

References

  1. Battaglia, A., & Verde, A. (2013). Dylan Dog tra catarsi e meccanismi di difesa: un’analisi criminologica del fumetto. Rassegna Italiana Di Criminologia, 7(2), 102–110.Google Scholar
  2. Ceretti, A., & Natali, L. (2019). Criminologia del genocidio, interazionismo radicale e processi di violentizzazione: il genocidio ruandese. Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia, in corso di pubblicazione.Google Scholar
  3. Crawley, E. (2004a). Emotion and performance prison officers and the presentation of self in prisons. Punishment & Society, 6(4), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawley, E. (2004b). Release and resettlement: Older prisoner perspectives. Criminal Justice Matters, 56(1), 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawley, E., & Sparks, R. (2005a). Hidden injuries? Researching the experiences of older men in English prisons. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(4), 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley, E., & Sparks, R. (2005b). Older men in prison: Survival, coping and identity. In A. Liebling & S. Maruna (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 343–366). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Crawley, E., & Sparks, R. (2006). Is there life after imprisonment? How elderly men talk about imprisonment and release. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrell, J. (1998). Criminological Verstehen. In J. Ferrell & M. Hamm (Eds.), Ethnography on the edge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrell, J. (1999). Cultural criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferrell, J. (2007). For a ruthless cultural criticism of everything existing. Crime Media Culture, 3(1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2008). Cultural criminology: An invitation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures (Vol. 5019). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Vol. 1: Power, property and the state. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, S. L. (1990). Social structural effects on emotions. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), American Psychology Association: Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 145–179). Albany, NY: Suny Press.Google Scholar
  17. Griswold, W. (2012). Cultures and societies in a changing world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Birmingham: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.Google Scholar
  19. Harding, J., & Pribram, E. D. (Eds.). (2009). Emotions: A cultural studies reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hayward, K., & Presdee, M. (Eds.). (2010). Framing crime: Cultural criminology and the image. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacques, S. (2014). The quantitative-qualitative divide in criminology: A theory of ideas’ importance, attractiveness, and publication. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Konradi, A. (1996). Preparing to testify rape survivors negotiating the criminal justice process. Gender & Society, 10(4), 404–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: A social psychological analysis of voluntary risk taking. American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 851–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nylander, P. Å., Lindberg, O., & Bruhn, A. (2011). Emotional labour and emotional strain among Swedish prison officers. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 469–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Procter, J. (2004). Stuart Hall. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenberg, M. (1990). Reflexivity and emotions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1992). A Theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tewksbury, R., De Michele, M. T., & Miller, M. J. (2005). Methodological orientations of articles appearing in criminal justice’s top journals: Who publishes what and where. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16(2), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thoits, P. A. (1989). The sociology of emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oriana Binik
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations