Advertisement

Effervescent and Ready for Use: The Sublime and Other Emotions in the Carnival of Crime

  • Oriana Binik
Chapter

Abstract

Which contemporary structures underlie fascination with crime?

This chapter starts with a reflection on the contemporary sublime in art and examples from Marina Abramovic to Body World exhibition. Then, it focuses on reading the fascination with crime from a sociological perspective and centres on emotions. The central concepts are liminality and the ‘carnival of crime’, which are described as a double metaphor of ‘fascination’. On one hand, we live in an emotional capitalist society, i.e. people are continuously in search of strong emotions to consume and one of these is the sublime connected with crime. On the other hand, we need to study if and how the emotions of fascination (the ‘awe’ aspect) might be considered a form of collective effervescence capable of creating social bonds. This chapter presents these two sides of crime fascination with multiple examples from American Psycho to Burning Man.

References

  1. Antonelli, F. (2007). Caos e postmodernità: un’analisi a partire dalla sociologia di Michel Maffesoli. Roma: Philos.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bastide, R. (2015). Le sacré sauvage.  Paris: FeniXX. Google Scholar
  4. Bataille, G. (1991). Attraction and repulsion II: Social structure. In D. Hollier (Ed.), The college of sociology (1937–39) (pp. 113–124). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society: Myths and structures. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (2013). Legislators and interpreters: On modernity, post-modernity and intellectuals. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Bazzanella, E. (2011). Lacan. Immaginario, simbolico e reale in tre lezioni. Trieste: Asterios.Google Scholar
  8. Bettelheim, B. (2010). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  9. Binik, O. (2017). L’arte del crimine tra liminale e liminoide. Il caso di Making a Murderer. Comunicazioni sociali, 2(2), 291–304.Google Scholar
  10. Declercq, F. (2006). Lacan on the capitalist discourse: Its consequences for libidinal enjoyment and social bonds. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 11(1), 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Matteis, S. (1986). Introduzione a Turner, V. In Dal rito al teatro. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  12. Dunkley, R. A., Morgan, N., & Westwood, S. (2007). A shot in the dark? Developing a new conceptual framework for thanatourism. Asian Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 1(1), 54–63.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, B. E. (1991). American psycho. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  14. Foster, H. (1996). The return of the real: The avant-garde at the end of the century. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Freud, S. (2003). The uncanny. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Girard, R. (1977). Violence and the sacred. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, S. (2003). Encoding/decoding. Television: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies, 4, 43–53.Google Scholar
  18. Horvath, A. (2013). Squaring the liminal or reproducing it: Charisma and trickster. In Modernism and charisma (pp. 21–38). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. Jarvis, B. (2007). Monsters Inc.: Serial killers and consumer culture. Crime, Media Culture, 3(3), 326–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kearney, R. (2012). Il male, la mostruosità e il sublime. Spazi del mostruoso, luoghi filosofici della mostruosità, 9(2), 171–201.Google Scholar
  22. Levitt, L. (2010). Death on display: Reifying stardom through Hollywood’s dark tourism. The Velvet Light Trap, 65(1), 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyotard, J. F. (1985). The sublime and the avant garde. Paragraph, 6(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maffesoli, M. (1988). Le temps des tribus: le déclin de l’individualisme dans les sociétés de masse. Paris: Librairie des Méridiens.Google Scholar
  25. Mazzoni, G. (2013). I desideri e le masse. Una riflessione sul presente. Between, 2(5). Google Scholar
  26. Mellino, M. (2007). Teoria senza disciplina. Conversazione sui «Cultural Studies» con Stuart Hall. Studi Culturali, 4(2), 309–342.Google Scholar
  27. Newman, B. (1948). The sublime is now. Tiger’s Eye, 1(6), 51–53.Google Scholar
  28. Olaveson, T. (2001). Collective effervescence and communitas: Processual models of ritual and society in Emile Durkheim and Victor Turner. Dialectical Anthropology, 26(2), 89–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Presdee, M. (2003). Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pulcini, E. (1997). Introduzione a Bataille, G. (1967). In Il dispendio (Trans. Italy). Roma: Armando Editore.Google Scholar
  31. Ramp, W. (2008). Le Malin Génie: Durkheim, Bataille and the prospect of a sociology of evil. In W. S. Pickering & M. Rosati (Eds.). (2013). Suffering and evil: The Durkheimian legacy. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  32. Recalcati, M. (1993). Il vuoto e il resto. Jacques Lacan e il problema del reale. Milano: Cuem.Google Scholar
  33. Recalcati, M. (2010). L’uomo senza inconscio: figure della nuova clinica psicoanalitica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar
  34. Rella, F. (2003). Introduzione a Bataille, G. In La parte maledetta: preceduto da la nozione di dépense. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  35. Rosati, M. (2002). Solidarietà e sacro. Secolarizzazione e persistenza della religione nel discorso sociologico della modernità. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  36. Rosati, M. (2005). The evil that men suffer: Evil and suffering from a Durkheimian perspective. Durkheimian Studies, 11(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosati, M. (2008). Suffering and evil in the elementary forms. In W. S. Pickering & M. Rosati (Eds.), Suffering and evil: The Durkheimian legacy (pp. 49–62). Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  38. Sassatelli, R. (2007). Consumer culture: History, theory and politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Senaldi, M. (2013). L’arte contemporanea e il negativo, introduzione a Žižek, S. In Il trash sublime. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  40. Shaw, P. (2006). The sublime. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Shields, R. (1990). The ‘System of Pleasure’: Liminality and the carnivalesque at Brighton. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(1), 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spiegel, A. D. (2011). Categorical difference versus continuum: Rethinking Turner’s liminal-liminoid distinction. Anthropology Southern Africa, 34(1–2), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stone, P. (2011). Dark tourism and the cadaveric carnival: Mediating life and death narratives at Gunther von Hagens’ Body Worlds. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(7), 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turnaturi, G. (2007). Emozioni: maneggiare con cura, Prefazione a Illouz E. In Intimità fredde. Le emozioni nella società dei consumi. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  45. Turner, V. W. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual (Vol. 101). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Turner, V. W. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Van Gennep, A. (2013). The rites of passage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oriana Binik
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations