Advertisement

Nuclear Weapons: Peaceful, Dangerous, or Irrelevant?

  • Patricia M. LewisEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

Nuclear weapons should be viewed in the context of their era. Nuclear doctrines are based on belief systems that are partially shared across possessor states and within alliances but rarely agreed outside those. At the core of those belief systems is the conviction that nuclear weapons represent a power that only certain countries could enjoy. As the belief in the effectiveness of nuclear deterrence is shifting, the risk calculations are also changing. Arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation measures were part of the old nuclear paradigm and it should not surprise anyone that new approaches to nuclear weapons such as the Nuclear Ban Treaty—or indeed the overt threat of nuclear use—are now being sought.

Keywords

Belief systems Nuclear doctrines Nuclear deterrence Arms control Disarmament Non-proliferation 

References

  1. ACT, Arms Control Today. (1999). Senate rejects comprehensive test ban treaty; Clinton vows to continue moratorium. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/1999_09-10/ctbso99. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  2. AP Mine Ban Convention. (1997). Convention on the prohibition of the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and on their destruction. https://www.apminebanconvention.org/fileadmin/APMBC/text_status/Ottawa_Convention_English.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2019.
  3. Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, University of Nagasaki. https://www-sdc.med.nagasaki-u.ac.jp/abdi/history/index_e.html. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  4. Atomic Heritage Foundation. (2017, May 12). The Manhattan Project. https://www.atomicheritage.org/history/manhattan-project. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  5. ATT, The Arms Trade Treaty. (2014). https://www.un.org/disarmament/convarms/arms-trade-treaty-2/. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  6. Belvedere, M. J. (2016, August 3). Trump asks why US can’t use nukes: MSNBC. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/03/trump-asks-why-us-cant-use-nukes-msnbcs-joe-scarborough-reports.html. Accessed 15 May 2019.
  7. Berry, K., Lewis, P., Pélopidas, B., Sokov, N., & Wilson, W. (2010). Delegitimizing nuclear weapons: Examining the validity of nuclear deterrence. Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Middlebury Institute. https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/dam/eda/de/documents/aussenpolitik/sicherheitspolitik/Delegitimizing_Nuclear_Weapons_May_2010.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  8. Borrie, J., Caughley, T., & Wan, W. (2017). Understanding nuclear weapon risks. http://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/understanding-nuclear-weapon-risks-en-676.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  9. Borrie, J., Dimmen, G. A., Hugo, G. T., Waszink, C., & Egeland, K. (2016). Gender development and nuclear weapons. UNIDIR: ILPI. http://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/gender-development-and-nuclear-weapons-en-659.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2019.
  10. Brodie, B. (1946). The absolute weapon: Atomic power and world order. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  11. Bush, G. H. W. (2000). All the best, George Bush: My life in letters and other writings. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. CCM, The Convention on Cluster Munitions. (2008). http://www.clusterconvention.org/the-convention/convention-text/. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  13. CTBT, The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. (1997). https://www.ctbto.org/the-treaty/. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  14. CWC, The Chemical Weapons Convention. (1993). https://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  15. Fihn, B. (2017, December 10). Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech. https://www.wagingpeace.org/beatrice-fihn-nobel-peace-prize-acceptance-speech/. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  16. Helfand, I. (2013). Global impacts of limited nuclear war on agriculture, food supplies, and human nutrition. Physicians for Social Responsibility. https://www.psr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/two-billion-at-risk.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  17. HINW, The Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons Conferences. (2013–2014). http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/disarmament-fora/hinw. Accessed 15 May 2019.
  18. ICRC, International Committee of the Red Cross. (2019). Is there any way to help the victims of a nuclear attack? https://www.icrc.org/en/nuclear-ban-treaty-no-to-nukes. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  19. INF Treaty. (1987). Treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the elimination of their intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles. https://www.state.gov/t/avc/trty/102360.htm. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  20. Isachenkov, V. (2018, December 20). Putin issues chilling warning on rising nuclear war threat. The National Post. https://nationalpost.com/news/world/putin-issues-chilling-warning-on-rising-nuclear-war-threat-it-could-lead-to-the-destruction-of-civilization-as-a-whole. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  21. Kristensen, H., & Norris, R. S. (2019). FAS nuclear notebook. Federation of American Scientists. https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/nuclear-notebook/. Accessed January 2019.
  22. Lewis, P., Unal, B., & Aghlani, S. (2017). Nuclear disarmament, the missing link in multilateralism. Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2016-10-12-nuclear-disarmament-lewis-unal-aghlani-final-2017_0.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  23. Lewis, P., Williams, H., Pélopidas, B., & Aghlani, S. (2014). Too close for comfort, cases of near nuclear use and options for policy. London: Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  24. Maresca, L., & Mitchell, E. (2016, July 5). The human costs and legal consequences of nuclear weapons under international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, No. 899. https://www.icrc.org/en/international-review/human-cost-nuclear-weapons. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  25. Mason, R., Asthana, A., & Syal, R. (2016, July 18). Theresa may would authorise nuclear strike causing mass loss of life. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/18/theresa-may-takes-aim-at-jeremy-corbyn-over-trident-renewal. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  26. Mozgovoi, A. (2002). The recollections of Vadim Orlov (USSR Submarine B-59): We will sink them all, but we will not disgrace our navy. In The Cuban samba of the quartet of foxtrots: Soviet submarines in the Caribbean crisis of 1962 [Translated by S. Savranskaya, The National Security Archive]. Moscow: Military Parade. http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB75/asw-II-16.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  27. National Security Archive. (2018, October). 60th anniversary of Irish resolution: A forerunner of the NPT. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2018-10-29/60th-anniversary-irish-resolution-forerunner-npt. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  28. Nayarit conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons, research papers and presentations. (2014). http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/disarmament-fora/hinw/nayarit-2014/statements. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  29. NPT, The Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty Review and Extension Conference. (1995). https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/npt1995/. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  30. OEWG, open-ended working group taking forward multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations. (2016). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N16/276/39/PDF/N1627639.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  31. Olson, M. (2015). Gender matters in the atomic age presentation. United Nations. www.nirs.org/radiation/radhealth/untalk2015.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  32. Oslo conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons, research papers and presentations. (2013). http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/disarmament-fora/hinw/oslo-2013/statements. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  33. Ozasa, K., et al. (2012). Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, report 14, 1950–2003: An overview of cancer and non-cancer diseases. Radiation Research, 177(3), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pan, Z. (2018). A study of China’s no-first-use policy on nuclear weapons. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 1(1). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/25751654.2018.1458415. Accessed 1 May 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pélopidas, B. (2017, July). The unbearable lightness of luck: Three sources of overconfidence in the manageability of nuclear crises. European Journal of International Security, 2(2), 240–262. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-international-security/article/unbearable-lightness-of-luck-three-sources-of-overconfidence-in-the-manageability-of-nuclear-crises/BDE95895C04E7E7988D15DB4F217D1E4. Accessed 1 May 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reagan, R., & Gorbachev, M. (1987, December 11). Joint U.S.-Soviet summit statement (Reykjavik, 7–10 December 1987). The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1987/12/11/joint-statement-by-reagan-gorbachev/cd990a8d-87a1-4d74-88f8-704f93c80cd3/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c493ff61a7fc. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  37. Ruff, T. A. (2013). The health consequences of nuclear explosions. In B. Fihn (Ed.), Unspeakable suffering, the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons. Geneva: Reaching Critical Will.Google Scholar
  38. Sagan, S. (1996–1997, Winter). Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. International Security, 21(3), 54–86.Google Scholar
  39. Savranskaya, S. V. (2005). New sources on the role of Soviet submarines in the Cuban missile crisis. Journal of Strategic Studies, 28(2), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sundaram, K., & Ramana, M. V. (2018). India and the policy of no first use of nuclear weapons. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 1(1). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/25751654.2018.1438737. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  41. Thakur, R., & Sidhu, W. P. S. (2006). Iraq crisis and world order, the structural, institutional and normative challenges. Tokyo: UNU Press.Google Scholar
  42. The Atomic Archive. (2019). The effects of nuclear weapons. http://www.atomicarchive.com/Effects/. Accessed January 2019.
  43. Ticehurst, R. (1997, April 30). The Martens clause and the laws of armed conflict. International Review of the Red Cross, 317. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/article/other/57jnhy.htm. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  44. Toon, O. B., Robock, A., Turco, R. P., Bardeen, C., Oman, L., & Stenchikov, G. L. (2007, March 2). Consequences of regional-scale nuclear conflicts. Science, 315. http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/SciencePolicyForumNW.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  45. TPNW, Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. (2017). https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/tpnw/. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  46. Unal, B., & Lewis, P. M. (2018). Cybersecurity of nuclear weapons systems: Threats, vulnerabilities and consequences. London: Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-01-11-cybersecurity-nuclear-weapons-unal-lewis-final.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  47. UN General Assembly Resolution 1(I), adopted on. (1946, January 24). http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/1/ares1.htm. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  48. UN POA, UN programme of action to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons. (2001). https://www.un.org/disarmament/convarms/salw/programme-of-action/. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  49. Vienna conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons, research papers and presentations. (2014). https://www.bmeia.gv.at/en/european-foreign-policy/disarmament/weapons-of-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/vienna-conference-on-the-humanitarian-impact-of-nuclear-weapons/presentations/. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  50. Walsh, J. (2006, March). Learning from past success: The NPT and the future of non-proliferation, paper no. 41. WMD Commission. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/wmdcno41.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  51. Wilson, W. (2013). Five myths about nuclear weapons. New York: Mariner Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chatham HouseLondonUK

Personalised recommendations