Nanomaterials in Agricultural Research: An Overview

  • Deepa Garg
  • Devendra K. Payasi
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 27)


New emerging technologies are often applied to improve the yield and quality of crops. Recent advancement in science and technology in the field of agricultural research has led to create unique properties targeted toward specific application in crop improvement. Nano-agriculture involves the employment of nanoparticles in agriculture. The emergence of nanotechnology and the development of nanodevices and nanomaterials can boost agricultural production by enhanced reactivity due to enhanced solubility, greater proportion of surface atoms relative to the interior of structure, unique magnetic/optical properties, electronic states, and catalytic reactivity that differ from equivalent bulk materials. These materials would release pesticides or fertilizers at a specific time and targeted location. Nanoparticles tagged to agrochemicals or other substances could reduce the damage to other plant tissues and the amount of chemical released into the environment. Between 1961 and 1999, global production outstripped population growth, but this was achieved partly through a 12% increase in the global area of cropland and a 10% increase in the area of permanent posture. During the same period, the overall productivity grew to 106%; however, this was linked to a 97% rise in the area of land under irrigation and 638%, 203%, and 854% increases, respectively, in the use of nitrogenous and phosphate fertilizers and production of pesticides. The situation could be gauged from data for the irrigated farming regions of the country, where the return of grain yield per kilogram of nutrient use was reduced from 13.4 kg in 1970 to 3.7 kg in 2015. The positive morphological effects of nanomaterials include enhanced germination percent and rate, whole plant architecture including root and shoot length and their ratio, biomass of seedlings, and harvest index of the plants. Application of nanomaterials in agricultural research holds the promise of controlled release of agrochemicals and site-targeted delivery of various useful macromolecules needed for improved plant disease resistance, efficient utilization of nutrients, and enhanced plant growth.


Agriculture Nanomaterials Nanoparticles Nanosensor Smart delivery system 


  1. Abd El-Rehirm HA, Hegazy ESA, Abd El-Mohdy HL (2004) Radiation synthesis of hydrogels to enhance sandy soils water retention and increase performance. J Appl Polym Sci 93:1360–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abd-elsalam KA (2013) Fungal genomics & biology nanoplatforms for plant pathogenic fungi management. Fungal Genom Biol 2:107Google Scholar
  3. Abedi-Koupai J, Asadkazemi J (2006) Effects of a hydrophilic polymer on the field performance of an ornamental plant (Cupressus arizonica) under reduced irrigation regimes. Iran Polym J 15:715–725Google Scholar
  4. Agrawal S, Rathore P (2014) Nanotechnology pros and cons to agriculture: a review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 3:43–55Google Scholar
  5. Ahmed A (1990) Applications of functionalized polymers in agriculture. J Islam Acad Sci 3(1):49–61Google Scholar
  6. Baac H, Hajós JP, Lee J, Kim D, Kim SJ, Shuler ML (2006) Antibody-based surface plasmon resonance detection of intact viral pathogen. Biotechnol Bioeng 94(4):815–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergeson LL (2010) Nanosilver: US EPA’s pesticide office considers how best to proceed. Environ Qual Manag 19(3):79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernhardt ES, Colman BP, Hochella MF, Cardinale BJ, Nisbet RM, Richardson CJ, Yin L, Boonham N, Glover R, Tomlinson J, Mumford R (2008) Exploiting generic platform technologies for the detection and identification of plant pathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol 121:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouwmeester H, Dekkers S, Noordam MY, Hagens WI, Bulder AS, de Heer C, ten Voorde SECGS, Wijnhoven WP, Marvin HJP, Sips AJAM (2009) Review of health safety aspects of nanotechnologies in food production. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 53:52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boonham N, Glover R, Tomlinson J, Mumford R (2008) Exploiting generic platform technologies for the detection and identification of plant pathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol 121(3):355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen P, Menzies J, Ehret D, Samuel L, Glass ADM (1992) Soluble silicon sprays inhibit powdery development in grape leaves. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117:906–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradley EL, Castle L, Chaudhry Q (2011) Applications of nanomaterials in food packaging with a consideration of opportunities for developing countries. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:604–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brecht MO, Datnoff LE, Kucharek TA, Nagata RT (2004) Influence of silicon and chlorothalonil on the suppression of gray leaf spot and increase plant growth in St. Augustine grass. Plant Dis 88:338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canas JE, Long M, Nations S, Vadan R, Dai L, Luo M, Ambikapathi R, Lee EH, Olszyk D (2008) Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1922–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chartuprayoon N, Rheem Y, Chen W, Myung NV (2010) Detection of plant pathogen using LPNE grown single conducting polymer nanoribbon. Abstract #2278, 218th ECS meetingGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen K, Arora R (2013) Priming memory invokes seed stress-tolerance. Environ Exp Bot 94:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen H, Seiber JN, Hotze M (2014) ACS select on nanotechnology in food and agriculture: a perspective on implications and applications. J Agric Food Chem 62:1209–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chinnamuthu CR, Boopathi PM (2009) Nanotechnology and agroecosystem. Madras Agric J 96:17–31Google Scholar
  19. Cioffi N, Torsi L, Ditaranto N (2004) Antifungal activity of polymer-based copper nanocomposite coatings. Appl Phys Lett 85(12):2417–2419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cross KM, Lu Y, Zheng T, Zhan J, McPherson G, John V (2009) Chapter 24: Water decontamination using iron and iron oxide nanoparticles. In: Savage N, Diallo M, Duncan J, Street A, Sustich R (eds) Nanotechnology applications for clean water. William Andrew Inc, Norwich, p 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De la Rosa G, Lopez-Moreno ML, de Haro D, Botez CE, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2013) Effects of ZnO nanoparticles in alfalfa, tomato, and cucumber at the germination stage: root development and X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies. Pure Appl Chem 85:2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DeRosa MC, Monreal C, Schnitzer M, Walsh R, Sultan Y (2010) Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat Nanotechnol 5(2):91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duhan JS, Kumar R, Kumar N, Kaur P, Nehra K, Duhan S (2017) Nanotechnology the new perspective in precision agriculture. Biotechnol Reports 15:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. El-Temsah YS, Joner EJ (2010) Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil. Environ Toxicol 27:42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Emamifar A, Kadivar M, Shahedi M, Soleimanian-Zad S (2010) Evaluation of nanocomposite packaging containing Ag and ZnO on shelf life of fresh orange juice. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 11:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Esteban-Tejeda L, Malpartida F, Esteban-Cubillo A, Pecharromán C, Moya JS (2009) Antibacterial and antifungal activity of a soda-lime glass containing copper nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 20(50):505–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feng BH and Peng LF (2012) Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl chitosan carrying ricinoleic functions as an emulsifier for azadirachtin. Carboh Polym 88:576–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fernandez-Penez M, Garrido-Herrara FJ, Gonzalez Prades E (2011) Alginate and lignin based formulation to control pesticides leaching in a calcareous soil. J Hazard Mater 190(1–3):794–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flores-Cespedes F, Figueredo-Flores CI, Daza-Fernandez I, Vidal-Pena F, Villafranca Sanchez M, Fernandez-Perez M (2012) Preparation and characterization of Imidacloprid Lignin-Polyethylene glycol matrices coated with Ethylcellulose. J Agric Food Chem 60:1042–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frandsen MV, Pedersen MS, Zellweger M, Gouin S, Roorda SD, Phan TQC (2010) Piperonyl butoxide and deltamethrin containing insecticidal polymer matrix comprising HDPE and LDPE. Patent number WO 2010015256 A2 20100211Google Scholar
  31. Ghormade V, Deshpande MV, Paknikar KM (2010) Perspectives for nanobiotechnology enabled protection and nutrition of plants. Biotechnol Adv 29:792–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldshtein R, Jaffe I, Tulbovich B (2005) Hydrophilic dispersions of nanoparticles of inclusion complexes of amorphous compounds. Patent number US 20050249786A120051110Google Scholar
  33. Gutiérrez FJ, Mussons ML, Gatón P, Rojo R (2011) Nanotechnology and food industry. Scientific, health and social aspects of the food industry. In Tech, Croatia Book ChapterGoogle Scholar
  34. Hellmann C, Greiner A, Wendorff JH (2011) Design of pheromone releasing nanofibers for plant protection. Pol Adv Technol 22:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoek EMV, Ghosh AK (2009) Chapter 4: Nanotechnology-based membranes for water purification. In: Savage N, Diallo M, Duncan J, Street A, Sustich R (eds) Nanotechnology applications for clean water. William Andrew Inc, Norwich, p 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horii A, McCue P, Shetty K (2007) Seed vigour studies in corn, soybean and tomato in response to fish protein hydrolysates and consequences on phenolic- linked responses. Bioresour Technol 11:2170–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hussain S et al (2015) Benefits of rice seed priming are offset permanently by prolonged storage and the storage conditions. Sci Rep 5:8101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hwang IC, Kim TH, Bang SH, Kim KS, Kwon HR, Seo MJ, Youn YN, Park HJ, Yasunaga-Aoki C, Yu YM (2011) Insecticidal effect of controlled release formulations of etofenprox based on nano-bio technique. J Fac Agric Kyushu Univ 56:33–40Google Scholar
  39. Ibrahim EA (2016) Seed priming to alleviate salinity stress in germinating seeds. J Plant Physiol 192:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Isiklan N (2004) Controlled release of insecticide carbaryl from crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose beads. Fre Environ Bull 13:537–544Google Scholar
  41. Jana T, Roy BC, Maiti S (2001) Biodegradable film 6. Modification of the film for control release of insecticides. Eur Pol J 37:861–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jo YK, Kim BH, Jung G (2009) Antifungal activity of silver ions and nano-particles on phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Dis 93(10):1037–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Khodakovskaya MV, Lahiani MH (2014) Nanoparticles and plants: from toxicity to activation of growth. In: Sahu SC, Casciano DA (eds) Handbook of Nanotoxicology, nanomedicine and stem cell use in toxicology. Wiley, New York, pp 121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Khodakovskaya M, Dervishi E, Mahmood M, Xu Y, Li Z, Watanabe F, Biris AS (2009) Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano 3:3221–3227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Khodakovskaya MV, de Silva K, Biris AS, Dervishi E, Villagarcia H (2012) Carbon nanotubes induce growth enhancement of tobacco cells. ACS Nano 6:2128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Khot Lav R, Sankaran S, Mari MJ, Ehsanireza SEW (2012) Application of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection. A review. Crop Prot 35:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim SW, Kim KS, Lamsal K, Kim YJ, Kim SB, Jung M, Sim SJ, Kim HS, Chang SJ, Kim JK, Lee YS (2009) An in vitro study of the antifungal effect of silver nanoparticles on oak wilt pathogen Raffaelea sp. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:760–764Google Scholar
  48. Kok FN, Wilkins RM, Cain RB, Arica MY, Alaeddinoglu G, Hasirci V (1999) Controlled release of aldicarb from lignin loaded ionotropic hydrogel microspheres. J Microencapsul 16:613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kulkarni AR, Soppimath KS, Aminabhavi TM, Dave AM, Mehta MH (1999) Application of sodium alginate beads crosslinked with glutaraldehyde for controlled release of pesticide. Polym News 2:285–286Google Scholar
  50. Larue C, Veronesi G, Flank AM, Surble S, Nathalie HB, Carrière M (2012) Comparative uptake and impact of TiO nanoparticles in wheat and rapeseed. J Toxic Environ Health Part A 75(13–15):722–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee WM, An YJ, Yoon H, Kweon HS (2008) Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants Mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): pant agar test for waterinsoluble nanoparticles. Environ Toxic Chem 27(9):1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee J, Mahendra S, Alvarez PJJ (2010) Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. ACS Nano 4(7):3580–3590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lentz RD (2003) Inhibiting water infiltration with PAM and surfactants: applications for irrigated agriculture. J Soil Water Conserv 58:290–300Google Scholar
  54. Li M, Huang Q, Wu Y (2011) A novel chitosan-poly (Lactide) copolymer and its submicron particles as imidacloprid carriers. Pest Manag Sci 67:831–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liang M, Zhan R, Liu Z, Niu A (2007) Preparation of superabsorbent slow release nitrogen fertilizer by inverse suspension polymerization. Polym Int 56:729–737Google Scholar
  56. Lin D, Xing B (2007) Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environ Pollut 150:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu Y, Laks P, Heiden P (2002) Controlled release of biocides in solid wood. ii.efficacy against Trametes versicolor and Gloeophyllum trabeum wood decay fungi. J Appl Polym Sci 86:608–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu Y, Tong Z, Prud’homme RK (2008) Stabilized polymeric nanoparticles for controlled and Agricultural efficient release of bifenthrin. Pest Manag Sci 64:808–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu Q, Chen B, Wang Q, Shi X, Xiao Z, Lin J, Fang X (2009) Carbonnanotubes as moleculer atranspoters for walled plant cells. Nano Lett 9:1007–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Loha KM, Shakil NA, Kumar J, Singh MK, Srivastava C (2012) Bio-efficacy evaluation of nanoformulations of cyfluthrin against Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Environ Sci Health Part B 47:687–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. López MM, Llop P, Olmos A, Marco-Noales E, Cambra M, Bertolini E (2009) Are molecular tools solving the challenges posed by detection of plant pathogenic bacteria and viruses? Curr Issues Mol Biol 11:13–46Google Scholar
  62. Lopez-Moreno ML, De La Rosa G, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2010) X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) corroboration of the uptake and storage of CeO2 nanoparticles and assessment of their differential toxicity in four edible plant species. J Agric Food Chem 58:3689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lu C, Zhang C, Wen J, Wu G, Tao M (2002) Research on effect of nanometer materials on germination and growth enhancement of Glycine max and its mechanism. Soybean Sci 21:168Google Scholar
  64. Lukianova-Hleb EY, Oginsky AO, Shenefelt DL, Drezek RA, Hafner JH (2011) Rainbow Plasmonic Nanobubbles: synergistic activation of gold nanoparticle clusters. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 2:104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mahakham W, Sarmah AK, Maensiri S, Theerakulpisut P (2017) Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Sci Rep 7:8263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mahmoodzadeh H, Nabavi M, Kashefi H (2000) Effect of nanoscale titanium dioxide particles on the germination and growth of canola Brassica napus. J Ornam Hortic Plants 3:25–32Google Scholar
  67. Mao HQ, Roy K, Troung-Le VL, Janes KA, Lin KY, Wang Y, August JT, Leong KW (2001) Chitosan-DNA nanoparticles as gene carriers: synthesis, characterization and transfection efficiency. J Control Release 70:399–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Martin-Ortigosa S, Valenstein JS, Lin VS, Trewyn BG, Wang K (2012a) Gold functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticle mediated protein and DNA Codelivery to plant cells via the biolistic method. Adv Funct Mater 22(17):3576–3582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Martin-Ortigosa S, Valenstein JS, Sun W, Moeller L, Fang N, Trewyn BG, Lin VS, Wang K (2012b) Parameters affecting the efficient delivery of mesoporous silica nanoparticle materials and gold Nanorods into plant tissues by the biolistic method. Small 8(3):413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Martin-Ortigosa S, Peterson DJ, Valenstein JS, Lin VS, Trewyn BG, Lyznok LA, Wang K (2014) Mesoporous silica nanoparticle mediated intraceller cre protein delivery for maize genome editing via lox P site excition. Plant Physiol 164(537):547Google Scholar
  71. Miralles P, Johnson E, Church TL, Harris AT (2012) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes in alfalfa and wheat: toxicology and uptake. J Rl Soc Interface 9:3514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mirzajani F, Askari H, Hamzelou S, Farzaneh M, Ghassempour A (2013) Effect of silver nanoparticles on Oryza sativa L. and its rhizosphere bacteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 88:48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mishra VK, Dwivedi DK, Mishra UK (2013) Emerging consequence of nanotechnology in agriculture: an outline. Trends Biosci 6(5):503–506Google Scholar
  74. Moaveni P, Kheiri T (2011) TiO2 nano particles affected on maize (Zea mays L). In: 2nd international conference on agricultural and animal science, November 25–27, Maldives. IACSIT Press, Singapore, pp 160–163Google Scholar
  75. Mondal A, Basu R, Das S, Nandy P (2011) Beneficial role of carbon nanotubes on mustard plant growth: an agricultural prospect. J Nanopart Res 13:4519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mohammad J, Mehr Z, Kabiri K (2008) Super absorbent polymer materials. A Review, Iranian Polym J 17(6):451–477Google Scholar
  77. Morla S, Ramachandra Rao CSV, Chakrapani R (2011) Factors affecting seed germination and seedling growth of tomato plants cultured in vitro conditions. J Chem Biol Phys Sci B 1:328Google Scholar
  78. Nair R, Varghese SH, Nair BG, Maekawa T, Yoshida Y (2010) Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Sci 179:154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nangmenyi G, Economy J (2009) Chapter 1: Nonmetallic particles for oligodynamic microbial disinfection. In: Savage N, Diallo M, Duncan J, Street A, Sustich R (eds) Nanotechnology applications for clean water. William Andrew Inc, Norwich, p 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nima AZ, Lahiani MH, Watanabe F, Xu Y, Khodakovskaya MV, Biris AS (2014) Plasmonically active nanorods for delivery of bio-active agents and high-sensitivity SERS detection in planta. RSC Adv 4(110):64985–64993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ochatt S (2013) Plant cell electrophysiology: applications in growth enhancement, somatic hybridisation and gene transfer. Biotechnol Adv 31(8):1237–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Parisi C, Vigani M, Rodriguez-cerezo E (2015) Agricultural nanotechnologies: what are the current possibilities. NanoToday 10:124–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Park S, Croteau P, Boering KA, Etheridge DM, Ferretti DP, Fraser J, Kim KR, Krumme PB, Langenfelds RLTDV, Ommen LP, Steele CM (1940) Trudinger, trends and seasonal cycles in the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide since. Nat Geosci 5:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Park HJ, Kim SH, Kim HJ, Choi SH (2006) A new composition of nanosized silica-silver for control of various plant diseases. Plant Pathol J 22(3):295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pelaez M, Nolan NT, Pillai SC, Seery MK, Falaras P, Kontos AG, Dunlop PS, Hamilton JW, Byrne JA, O’Shea K (2012) A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl Catal B Environ 125:331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Prasad TNVKV, Sudhakar P, Sreenivasulu Y, Latha P, Munaswamy V, Reddy KR, Sreeprasad TSP, Sajanlal R, Pradeep T (2012) Effect of nanoscale zinc oxide particles on the germination, growth and yield of peanut. J Plant Nutr 35:905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Quaglia F, Barbato F, De Rosa G, Granata E, Miro A, La Rotonda MI (2001) Reduction of the environmental impact of pesticides: waxy microspheres encapsulating the insecticide carbaryl. J Agric Food Chem 49:4808–4812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Qureshi A, Kang WP, Davidson JL, Gurbuz Y (2009) Review on carbon-derived, solid-state, micro and nano sensors for electrochemical sensing applications. Diam Relat Mater 18:1401–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ragaei M, Sabry A-KH (2014) Nanotechnology for insect pest control. Int J Sci Environ 2:528–545Google Scholar
  90. Rai V, Acharya S, Dey N (2012) Implication of nanobiosensors in agriculture. J Biomate Nanobiotechnol 3:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rajakumar G, Abdul Rahuman A, Priyamvada B, Gopiesh Khanna V, Kishore Kumar D, Sujin PJ (2012) Eclipta prostrata leaf aqueous extract mediated synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Mater Lett 68:115–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Raliya R, Tarafdar JC (2013) ZnO nanoparticle biosynthesis and its effect on phosphorous-mobilizing enzyme secretion and gum contents in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agric Res 2:48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ramesh M, Palanisamy K, Babu K, Sharma NK (2014) Effects of bulk & nano-titanium dioxide and zinc oxide on physio-morphological changes in Triticum aestivum Linn. J Glob Biosci 3:415Google Scholar
  94. Raskar SV and Laware SL (2014) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on cytology and seed germination in onion. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 3:467Google Scholar
  95. Rico CM, Majumdar S, Duarte-Gardea M, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. J Agric Food Chem 59:3485–3498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Santhoshkumar T, Rahuman AA, Jayaseelan C, Rajakumar G, Marimuthu S, Kirthi AV, Velayutham K, Thomas J, Venkatesan J, Kim SK (2014) Green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Psidium guajava extract and its antibacterial and antioxidant properties. Asian Pac J Trop Med 7:968–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Scott NR, Chen H (2003) Nanoscale science and engineering or agriculture and food systems. Roadmap report of national planning workshop 2002, 18–19 November, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  98. Sedghi M, Hadi M, Toluie SG (2013) Effect of nano zinc oxide on the germination of soybean seeds under drought stress. Ann West Uni Timisoara Ser Biol XVI:73Google Scholar
  99. Sekhon BS (2014) Nanobiotechnology in agri-food production: an overview. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 7:31–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sharon M, Choudhary A, Kumar R (2010) Nanotechnology in agricultural diseases and food safety. J Phytology 2(4):83–92Google Scholar
  101. Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH (2014) Role of nano-SiO2 in germination of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum seeds mill.). Saudi J Biol Sci 21(1):13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Silva AT, Nguyen A, Ye C, Verchot J, Moon JH (2010) Conjugated polymers nanoparticles for effective SiRNA delivery to tobacco BY-2 protoplast. BMC Plant Biol 10:291. 2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Singh S, Singh M, Agrawal VV, Kumar A (2010) An attempt to develop surface plasmon resonance based immunosensor for Karnal bunt (Tilletia indica) diagnosis based on the experience of nano-gold based lateral flow immune dipstick test. Thin Solid Films 519:1156–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Stampoulis D, Sinha SK, White JC (2009) Assay-dependent phytotoxicity of nanoparticles to plants. Environ Sci Technol 43(24):9473–9479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sun G, Wheatley WB, Worley SD (1994) A new cyclic N-Halamine. Biocidal polymer. Indian Eng Chem Res 33:68–170Google Scholar
  106. Suriyaprabha R, Karunakaran G, Yuvakkumar R, Rajendran V, Kannan N (2012) Silica nanoparticles for increased silica availability in maize (Zea mays L) seeds under hydroponic conditions. Curr Nanosci 8:902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Taylor NJ, Fauquet CM (2002) Microparticle bombardment as a tool in plant science and agricultural biotechnology. DNA Cell Biol 21(12):963–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VS-Y, Wang K (2007) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol 2:295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ulrichs C, Mewis I, Goswami A (2005) Crop diversification aiming nutritional security in West Bengal: biotechnology of stinging capsules in nature’s water bloom. Ann Tech Issue State Agri Technol Serv Assoc, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  110. Upadhyaya H, Shome S, Tewari S, Bhattacharya MK, Panda SK (2015) Nanotechnology: Noval perspectives and prospects. McGraw Hill education India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, pp 508–512Google Scholar
  111. Wang X, Han H, Liu X, Gu X, Chen K, Lu D (2012) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes can enhance root elongation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants. J Nanopart Res 14:1Google Scholar
  112. Wright JE (1997) Formulation for insect sex pheromone dispersion. Patent number US 5670145 A 19970923Google Scholar
  113. Wu L, Liu M, Liang R (2008) Preparation and properties of a double-coated slow-release NPK compound with superabsorbent and water retention. Bioresour Technol 99:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wu SG, Huang L, Head J, Chen DR, Kong IC, Tang YJ (2012) Phytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles is related to both dissolved metals ions and adsorption of particles on seed surfaces. J Pet Environ Biotechnol 3:126Google Scholar
  115. Yang L, Watts DJ (2005) Particle surface characteristics may play an important role in phytotoxicity of alumina nano particles. Toxicol Lett 158:122–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Yan H, Mochizuki Y, Jo T, Okuzaki H (2011) Single-walled-carbon-nanotube based field effect transistors with biosensing functions for prostate-specific-antigen. J Bioequiv Avail 3:69–71Google Scholar
  117. Yang F, Hong F, You W, Liu C, Gao F, Wu C, Yang P (2006) Influence of nano-anatase TiO2 on the nitrogen metabolism of growing spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 110:179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Yang FL, Li XG, Zhu F, Lei CL (2009) Structural characterization of nanoparticles loaded with garlic essential oil and their insecticidal activity against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Agric Food Chem 57(21):10156–10162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Yao KS, Li SJ, Tzeng KC, Cheng TC, Chang CY, Chiu CY, Liao CY, Hsu JJ, Lin ZP (2009) Fluorescence silica nanoprobe as a biomarker for rapid detection of plant pathogens. Adv Mater Res 79-82:513–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Yazdani F, Allahdadi I, AbasAkbari G (2007) Impact of superabsorbent polymer on yield and growth analysis of soybean (Glycine max L.) under drought stress condition. Pakistan J Biol Sci 10(23):4190–4196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zambrano-Zaragoza ML, Mercado-Silva E, Gutiérrez-Cortez E, Castaño-Tostado E, Quintanar-Guerrero D (2011) Optimization of nanocapsules preparation by the emulsion diffusion method for food applications. LWT-Food Sci Technol 44:1362–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, Liu C (2005) Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 104:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepa Garg
    • 1
  • Devendra K. Payasi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyKurukshetra UniversityKurukshetraIndia
  2. 2.Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Regional Agricultural Research StationSagarIndia

Personalised recommendations