Adolescents in Constitutional Law

  • Roger J. R. LevesqueEmail author
Part of the Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development book series (ARAD)


This chapter introduces how adolescents constitute a diverse group with different needs, abilities, and circumstances. It reveals how, despite that diversity, understanding the rights of adolescents requires beginning with a legal definition: it means viewing adolescents as youth who have reached puberty but have not yet reached 18 years of age—those considered “minors.” It then briefly details the legal system’s general approach to their rights and how legal developments have stalled. That failed development reveals how many freedoms go either ignored or unrecognized. The discussion then examines the obstacles that limit the development of adolescents’ rights, with those obstacles relating to adolescents’ abilities and place in society as well as the nature of rights themselves. The chapter ends by highlighting the importance of understanding the constitutional foundation of adolescents’ rights and by introducing the chapters that follow.


Adolescents Juvenile rights Children’s rights Minors 



Some of the arguments in the third part of this chapter summarize materials from the first chapter of the author’s edited book Adolescence, Rapid Social Change and the Law (Levesque 2016) published by the same publisher as this book.


  1. Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979).Google Scholar
  2. J. D. B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. 261 (2011).Google Scholar
  3. Levesque, R. J. R. (2000). Adolescents, sex, and the law: Preparing adolescents for responsible citizenship. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Levesque, R. J. R. (2002). Not by faith alone: Religion, law, and adolescence. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Levesque, R. J. R. (2006). The psychology and law of criminal justice processes. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Levesque, R. J. R. (2007). Adolescence, media and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levesque, R. J. R. (2008a). Child maltreatment and the law: Returning to first principles. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Levesque, R. J. R. (2008b). Regardless of frontiers: Adolescents and the human right to information. Journal of Social Issues, 64(4), 725–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levesque, R. J. R. (2015). Adolescence, discrimination, and the law: Addressing dramatic shifts in equality jurisprudence. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levesque, R. J. R. (2016). Adolescence, privacy and the law: A developmental science perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levesque, R. J. R. (2017). The science and law of school segregation and diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).Google Scholar
  13. Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982).Google Scholar
  14. Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).Google Scholar
  15. Woolard, J. L. (2012). Young adults: How different is “different enough” for social science, law, and policy? Criminology & Public Policy, 11(4), 723–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations