Advertisement

Towards Enlightened Communities: The Eighteenth Century

  • Henry TamEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the author demonstrates that while there was an egoistic strand of thought that ran through the likes of Mandeville and de Sade in the eighteenth century, many of the leading Enlightenment thinkers actually argued for the development of inclusive community relations in line with mutual responsibility, cooperative enquiry, and citizen participation. His exposition covers the case made for empathic communities by Shaftesbury and Hutcheson; for critical communities by Hume and Diderot; and for democratic communities by Paine. He further brings out the interconnections of these ideas in relation to changes to societal practice in the 1700s. He concludes with a review of how these ideas were incorporated into the approaches to learning championed by leading reformists such as Condorcet, Wollstonecraft, and Jefferson.

References

  1. Bendor, J., & Mookherjee, D. (2008). Communitarian Versus Universalistic Norms. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blom, P. (2010). A Wicked Company: The Forgotten Radicalism of European Enlightenment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, E. (1999). Reflections on the Revolution in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burstein, A., & Isenberg, N. (2013). Madison and Jefferson. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Claeys, G. (1989). Thomas Paine: Social and Political Thought. Boston: Unwin Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Claeys, G. (2007). The French Revolution Debate in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Condorcet, N. (1790). On Giving Women the Right of Citizenship. In I. McLean & F. Hewitt (Eds.) (1994), Condorcet: Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory (pp. 335–340). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Condorcet, N. (1979). Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind. Santa Barbara: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  9. D’Alembert, J. (1995). Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot (R. N. Schwab, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, M. T. (Ed.). (2002). The London Corresponding Society 1792–1799. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. D’Holbach, B. (1889). System of Nature. Boston: J. P. Mendum.Google Scholar
  12. Easlea, B. (1980). Witch-Hunting, Magic & the New Philosophy. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  13. Farr, J., & Williams, D. L. (2015). The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foot, M., & Kramnick, I. (1987). The Thomas Paine Reader. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gay, P. (1973). The Enlightenment: An Interpretation—Vol. 1, The Rise of Modern Paganism. London: Wildwood House.Google Scholar
  16. Goodell, E. (1994). The Noble Philosopher: Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hume, D. (2008). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hutcheson, F. (1994). Philosophical Writings (R. S. Downie, Ed.). London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
  19. Hutcheson, F. (2015). A System of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutcheson, F. (2018). A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Farmington Hills: Gale ECCO.Google Scholar
  21. Israel, J. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jefferson, T. (1999). Political Writings (J. Appleby and T. Ball, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Livingston, D. W. (1984). Hume’s Philosophy of Common Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Livingston, D. W., & King, J. T. (Eds.). (1976). Hume: A Re-evaluation. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mason, J. H., & Wokler, R. (Eds.). (1992). Denis Diderot: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mori, J. (2014). Britain in the Age of the French Revolution 1785–1820. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Munck, T. (2000). The Enlightenment: A Comparative History 1721–1794. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  28. Pagden, A. (2013). The Enlightenment and Why It Still Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Paine, T. (1775). African Slavery in America. In M. Foot & I. Kramnick (1987), pp. 52–56.Google Scholar
  30. Paine, T. (1792). The Rights of Man (Part 2). In M. Foot & I. Kramnick (1987), pp. 263–364.Google Scholar
  31. Paine, T. (1793). Reasons for Preserving the Life of Louis Capet. In M. Foot & I. Kramnick (1987), pp. 394–398.Google Scholar
  32. Paine, T. (1795). Agrarian Justice. In M. Foot & I. Kramnick (1987), pp. 471–489.Google Scholar
  33. Porter, R. (1997). The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity from Antiquity to the Present. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  34. Scott, W. R. (1992). Francis Hutcheson: His Life, Teaching and Position in the History of Philosophy. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
  35. Shaftesbury. (1977). An Inquiry Concerning Virtue, or Merit (D. Walford, Ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tomasello, M. (2009). Why We Cooperate. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wollstonecraft, M. (1995). A Vindication of the Rights of Men and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (S. Tomaselli, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations