Managing Trust Relationships in Digital Crime
This chapter examines how trust is built between users of illicit spaces and the trust that users put into technology. There has been a significant focus on what is called trustless technology, systems that in theory allow users to make agreements enforceable by software. The blockchain used by the bitcoin cryptocurrency is, or claims itself as, a trustless technology. An core implementation of trustless technology is writing smart contracts with arrangements adjudicated by blockhain software. Venture capitalists have been keen to pour money into this area. This shows a level of faith in computer code to solve problems and allow otherwise distant or uncooperative actors to reach agreement. However, the working of trustless technologies relies on a rich lattice of communicative individuals in order to make it work. Shared culture and meaning are needed, not only for people to comprehend machines, but for machines to talk to each other.
- De Filippi, P., & Hassan, S. (2016). Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: From code is law to law is code. First Monday, 21(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i12.7113.
- Gambetta, D. (2011). Codes of the underworld: How criminals communicate. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Hammond, L. (2016). Obliged to Give: Remittances and the Maintenance of Transnational Networks Between Somalis at Home and Abroad. 10, 27.Google Scholar
- Johansen, P., & von Lampe, K. (2002). Is there honor among crooks? On the importance of trust in criminal relations. Chicago: American Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
- Law, J. (1990). Introduction: Monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations. Sociological Review, 38, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03346.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lusthaus, J. (2015, August 5). All’s Fair in Love and War? Retrieved 11 July 2018, from Industry of Anonymity website: https://industryofanonymity.com/2015/08/05/alls-fair-in-love-and-war/.
- Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks. First Monday, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548.