Social Justice Politics: Care as Democracy and Resistance

  • Donna BainesEmail author


Joan Tronto argues that democracy and social justice require the ongoing care and participation of all citizens. Similarly, “an acceptable way to allocate caring responsibilities must be fostered in a way that…achieves the goals of freedom, equality, and justice” (Tronto, Caring democracy: Markets, equality, democracy. New York: New York University Press, 2013, p. 141). This chapter explores resistance practices within the highly feminised care work arena in which workers struggle to care more fully while simultaneously fighting for decent conditions for themselves and each other. Though frequently overlooked, this resistance is a form of highly democratic, participatory care for the larger social good and for those involved in the care relationship in all its progressive forms. This chapter argues in Gramscian form that, perhaps, some of the social justice changes we seek are already happening.


  1. Aptheker, B. (1989). Tapestries of life: Women’s work, women’s consciousness, and the meaning of daily experience. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, P., Armstrong, H., & MacLeod, K. K. (2016). The threats of privatization to security in long-term residential care. Ageing International, 41(1), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, J., & Neysmith, S. M. (2006). Obscuring the costs of home care: Restructuring at work. Work, Employment and Society, 20(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronson, J., & Smith, K. (2009). Managing restructured social services: Expanding the social? British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 530–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baines, D. (2016). Moral projects and compromise resistance: Resisting uncaring in nonprofit care work. Studies in Political Economy, 97(2), 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baines, D. with Daly, T. (2015). Resisting regulatory rigidities: Lessons from front-line care work. Studies in Political Economy, 95(Spring), 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baines, D., Charlesworth, S., Turner, D., & O’Neill, L. (2014). Lean social care and worker identity: The role of outcomes, supervision and mission. Critical Social Policy, 34(4), 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolton, S. C., & Wibberley, G. (2014). Domiciliary care: The formal and informal labour process. Sociology, 48(4), 682–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charlesworth, S. (2010). The regulation of paid care workers’ wages and conditions in the non-profit sector: A Toronto case study. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 65(3), 380–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatterjee, D. (2009). The conflicting loyalties of statism and globalism: Can global democracy resolve the liberal conundrum? Metaphilosophy, 40(1), 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, J. (2004). Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neo-liberalism. Journal of Social Policy, 33(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham, I. (2008). A race to the bottom? Exploring variations in employment conditions in the voluntary sector. Public Administration, 86(4), 1033–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunningham, I., & James, P. (2009). The outsourcing of social care in Britain: What does it mean for the voluntary sector workers? Work, Employment and Society, 23(2), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daly, T., Armstrong, P., & Lowndes, R. (2015). Liminality in Ontario’s long-term care facilities: Private companions’ care work in the space ‘betwixt and between’. Competition & Change, 19(3), 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies, S. (2008). Contracting out employment services to the third and private sectors: A critique. Critical Social Policy, 28(2), 136–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duffy, M. (2011). Making care count: A century of gender, race, and paid care work. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  18. England, P. (2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. England, P., Budig, M., & Folbre, N. (2002). Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems, 49(4), 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Etu. (2017). Historic win for equal pay. Accessed 11 May 2018.
  21. Ferrante, G., Pesando, L. M., & Nowacka, K. (2014). Unpaid care work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes (Issues Paper). OECD Development Centre. Accessed 10 May 2018.
  22. Folbre, N. (2006a). Measuring care: Gender, empowerment, and the care economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folbre, N. (2006b). Demanding quality: Worker/consumer coalitions and “high road” strategies in the care sector. Politics and Society, 34(1), 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Folbre, N. (2012). Should women care less? Intrinsic motivation and gender inequality. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(3), 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fraser, N. (2010). Scales of justice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gabbatiss, J. (2017). Brexit strongly linked to xenophobia, scientists conclude. Accessed 11 May 2018.
  27. Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q., & Nowell-Smith, G. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, D. (2010). Social justice and the city. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  29. Healy, J. (2002). The care of older people: Australia and the United Kingdom. Social Policy & Administration, 36(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hearn, J. (2012). A multi-faceted power analysis of men’s violence to known women: From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. The Sociological Review, 60(4), 589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henderson, E. J., & Caplan, G. A. (2008). Home sweet home? Community care for older people in Australia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 9(2), 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Human Rights Commission. (2016). Insight into the Kristine Bartlett equal pay case. Accessed 10 May 2018.
  33. Krull, C., & Sempruch, J. (2011). Introduction. In C. Krull & J. Sempruch (Eds.), A life in balance. Reopening the family-work debate (pp. 1–19). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  34. McGimpsey, I. (2017). Late neoliberalism: Delineating a policy regime. Critical Social Policy, 37(1), 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Beaujouan, É. (2013). Education and cohabitation in Britain: A return to traditional patterns? Population and Development Review, 39(3), 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. NZ Herald. (2016). Govt pay equity decision hailed as ‘historic’ step towards gender equality. Accessed 10 May 2018.
  37. Palmer, E., & Eveline, J. (2012). Sustaining low pay in aged care work. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(3), 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peck, J. (2010). Zombie neoliberalism and the ambidextrous state. Theoretical Criminology, 14(1), 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raghunathan, S. (2018). Trump’s xenophobic vision of America is inciting racist violence. Accessed 11 May 2018.
  40. Sangiovanni, A. (2007). Global justice, reciprocity, and the state. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35(1), 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scholte, J. (2014). Reinventing global democracy. European Journal of International Relations, 20(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Themudo, N. S. (2009). Gender and the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 663–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Titmuss, R. (1974). Social policy: An introduction. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  45. Tronto, J. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wolkowitz, C. (2006). Bodies at work. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations