Advertisement

On Settler Notions of Social Justice: The Importance of Disrupting and Displacing Colonising Narratives

  • Sheelagh Daniels-MayesEmail author
  • Valerie Harwood
  • Nyssa Murray
Chapter

Abstract

Universities have a unique responsibility to social justice with Aboriginal peoples. Yet settler privilege is evident in how teaching standards and research funding are determined predominantly by government, delivered and driven by universities born out of dispossessing colonisation. Consequently, research projects intended to disrupt/displace settler narratives of social justice run the risk of being sucked back into the mainstreamed system (Castagno, Educated in whiteness: Good intentions and diversity in schools. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 2014; Ladson-Billings and Tate, Toward a critical race theory of education. In A. Dimon & C. Rousseau (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song (p. 1130). New York: Routledge, 2006), perpetuating university privilege rather than fulfilling the university’s social justice responsibilities. This chapter explores ways universities can work alongside Aboriginal peoples and communities. Drawing on the Arendtian idea of responsibility, the authors ask: could universities better engage in social justice with Aboriginal people if responsibility meant the welcoming of initiatives that might challenge the university and its traditions?

References

  1. Archibald, J. A. (2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1946). The political meaning of racial antisemitism. In Outlines and research memoranda, Hannah Arendt Papers at the Library of Congress, Washington, DC. https://memory.loc.gov/ammem/arendthtml/arendthome.html
  3. Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind (Vol 1 Thinking). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (2003a). Thinking and moral considerations. In J. Kohn (Ed.), Responsibility and judgment (pp. 159–189). New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, H. (2003b). Collective responsibility. In J. Kohn (Ed.), Responsibility and judgment (pp. 147–158). New York: Schochen.Google Scholar
  6. Arendt, H. (2005). Introduction into politics. In J. Kohn (Ed.), The promise of politics (pp. 93–200). New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  7. Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (2012). Guidelines for ethical research in Australian indigenous studies. From https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/research-and-guides/ethics/gerais.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2018.
  8. Beresford, Q. (2012). Separate and unequal: An outline of Aboriginal education 19001990s. In Q. Beresford & G. Partington (Eds.), Reform and resistance in aboriginal education: The Australian experience (pp. 85–120). Perth: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bessarab, D., & Ng’andu, B. (2010). Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in indigenous research. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 3(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blair, N. (2015). Privileging Australian indigenous knowledges. Sweet potatoes, spiders, Waterlilys and brick walls. Champaign: Common Ground Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourke, E. (1995). Dilemmas of integrity and knowledge: protocol in Aboriginal research. In School of Indigenous Australian Studies (Ed.), Indigenous research ethics: Papers from the conference held in Townsville in September 1995 (pp. 9–20). Townsville: Centre for Social and Welfare Research, James Cook University.Google Scholar
  13. Brayboy, B. M. J. (2006). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckskin, P. (2013). Engaging indigenous students: The important relationship between aboriginal and Torres Strait islander students and their teachers. In K. Price (Ed.), Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander education: An introduction for the teaching profession (pp. 164–180). Sydney: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Canovan, M. (1992). Hannah Arendt: A reinterpretation of her political thought. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castagno, A. E. (2014). Educated in whiteness: Good intentions and diversity in schools. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniels-Mayes, S. (2016). Culturally responsive pedagogies of success: Improving educational outcomes for aboriginal students (Unpublished thesis). Adelaide: UNISA.Google Scholar
  18. Daniels-Mayes, S., Harwood, V., & Murray, N. (2019). Saying No to Niceness: Innovative, progressive and transformative inclusive education with Australian Aboriginal students. In M. Schuelka, C. Johnstone, G. Thomas, & A. J. Artiles (Eds.), SAGE handbook of inclusion and diversity in education. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  19. Ford, M. (2013). Achievement gaps in Australia: What NAPLAN reveals about education inequality in Australia. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 80–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillborn, D. (2008). Racism and education: Coincidence or conspiracy? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habibis, D., Taylor, P., Walter, M., & Elder, C. (2016). Repositioning the racial gaze: Aboriginal perspectives on race, race relations and governance. Social Inclusion, 4(1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hart, V., & Whatman, S. (1998). Decolonising the concept of knowledge. Paper presented at the HERDSA conference, Auckland.Google Scholar
  23. Harwood, V., & Murray, N. (2019a). Strategic discourse production and parent involvement: Including parent knowledge and practices in the Lead My Learning campaign. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(4), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harwood, V., & Murray, N. (2019b). The promotion of education: A critical cultural social marketing approach. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hermsen, J. J., & Villa, D. R. (1999). The judge and the spectator: Hannah Arendt’s political philosophy. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  26. Herzog, A. (2004). Hannah Arendt’s concept of responsibility. Studies in Social and Philosophical Thought, 10, 39–52.Google Scholar
  27. Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. (2006). Toward a critical race theory of education. In A. Dimon & C. Rousseau (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song (p. 1130). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Malin, M. A., & Ngarritjan, T. (1999). Confronting the deceptions of racism: Whiteness, social change and teacher education. Paper presented to the ACSA biennial conference in Perth, WA, September 30–October 2.Google Scholar
  30. Manne, R. (2012). Aboriginal child removal and the question of genocide. In A. D. Moses (Ed.), Genocide and settler society, frontier violence and stolen indigenous children in Australian history (pp. 217–243). New York: Bentham Books.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, K. (2003). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and Indigenist research. Journal of Australian Studies, 27(76), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matthews, C. (2012). Maths is storytelling: Maths is beautiful. In K. Price (Ed.), Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander education: An introduction for the teaching profession (pp. 108–134). Sydney: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  33. McKnight, A. (2015). Mingadhuga Mingayung: Respecting country through Mother Mountain’s stories to share her cultural voice in Western academic structures. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(3), 276–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mookherjee, N., Rapport, N., Josephides, L., Hage, G., Renier Todd, L., & Cowlishaw, G. (2009). The ethics of apology: A set of commentaries. Critique of Anthropology, 29(3), 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moses, A. D. (2012). Genocide and settler society in Australian history. In A. D. Moses (Ed.), Genocide and settler society, frontier violence and stolen indigenous children in Australia history (pp. 3–48). New York: Bentham Books.Google Scholar
  36. Murray, N., & Harwood, V. (2016). The importance of Aboriginal protocols in promoting educational futures. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Curtin University. https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/the-importance-of-aboriginal-protocols-in-promoting-educational-futures
  37. Narayan, K. (1993). How native is a “native” anthropologist? American Anthropologist, New Series, 95(3), 671–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neu, D. E., & Therrien, R. (2003). Accounting for genocide: Canada’s bureaucratic assault on aboriginal people. Black Point: Fernwood.Google Scholar
  39. Povinelli, E. A. (2016). Geontologies: A requiem to late liberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rigney, L.-I. (2006). Indigenous Australian views on knowledge production and indigenist research. In J. E. Kunnie & N. I. Goduka (Eds.), Indigenous peoples’ wisdom and power. Affirming our knowledge through narratives. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  41. Roithmayr, D. (2004). Locked in segregation. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law, 12(957), 1–60.Google Scholar
  42. Rose, D. B. (2001). Aboriginal life and death in Australian settler nationhood. Aboriginal History, 25(25), 148–162.Google Scholar
  43. Sarra, G., Matthews, C., Ewing, B., & Cooper, T. (2011). Indigenous mathematics: Creating an equitable learning environment. In N. Purdie, G. Milgate, & H. R. Bell (Eds.), Two way teaching and learning: Toward culturally reflective and relevant education (pp. 173–188). Victoria: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sefa Dei, G. J., & Kempf, A. (2006). Anti-colonialism and education: The politics of resistance. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sellar, S. (2015). Transparency and opacity: Levinasian reflections on accountability in Australian schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(2), 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sloan Morgan, V. (2017). Moving from rights to responsibilities: Extending Hannah Arendt’s critique of collective responsibility to the settler colonial context of Canada. Settler Colonial Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2017.1327011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strakosch, E. (2016). Beyond colonial completion: Arendt, settler colonialism and the end of politics. In S. Maddison, T. Clark, & R. de Costa (Eds.), The limits of settler colonial reconciliation (pp. 15–33). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson, S. (2001). What is an Indigenous research methodology? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 175–179.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Yellow Bird, M. (2005). Decolonising tribal enrolment. In W. A. Wilson & M. Yellow Bird (Eds.), For indigenous e yes only: A decolonisation handbook (pp. 179–188). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheelagh Daniels-Mayes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Valerie Harwood
    • 1
  • Nyssa Murray
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations