‘Teaching’ Social Justice Through Community-Embedded Learning

  • Margot RawsthorneEmail author


This chapter critically explores the experience of offering social justice learning opportunities to university students through community-embedded initiatives. It draws on Freirean (Education for critical consciousness. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 1974) notions of critical pedagogy—education that questions everyday life, identifies contradictions, makes critical connections with the structures of society that discriminate and acts to change things for the better. Over the past decade this commitment to identifying and addressing disadvantage has formed the foundation of a teaching, learning and research engagement with the University of Sydney’s neighbours in Glebe and Camperdown through the Glebe Community Development Project. The chapter seeks to highlight that teaching and learning social justice is founded on listening, deep and respective relationships, intentional mutual learning, mutual benefit and exchange in context.


  1. Amaro-Jiménez, C. (2012). Service learning: Preparing teachers to understand better culturally and linguistically diverse learners. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 38(2), 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsler, S. (2013). Criticality, pedagogy and the promises of radical democratic education. In S. Cowden & G. Singh (Eds.), Acts of knowing: Critical pedagogy in, against and beyond the university. New York/London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R., & Jacobs, K. (2008) Public housing in Australia: Stigma, home and opportunities. Housing and community research unit, paper no. 1, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  4. Bandy, J. (n.d.). Best practices in community engaged teaching, Vanderbilt University. Available at
  5. City of Sydney. (2016). Community profile: Glebe. From Accessed 20 May 2018.
  6. Clancey, G., & Russell, S. (2016). Glebe community needs analysis. Unpublished report, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  7. Concerned Older Women’s Group. (2014). Concerned older women: A history. Glebe 2005 to 2014.Google Scholar
  8. Duke University. (2018). Resources for responsible and ethical engagement. Available at
  9. Durham University. (2018). Centre for social justice and community action: Toolkits, guides and case studies. Available at
  10. Fook, J. (2001). Linking theory, practice and research. Critical Social Work, 2(1). Retrieved from:
  11. Fraser Howard & Partners. (2009). Evaluation of the glebe community development project. Newcastle: Fraser Howard & Partners. Retrieved from
  12. Giroux, H. (2010). Bare pedagogy and the scourge of neoliberalism: Rethinking higher education as a democratic public sphere. The Educational Forum, 74(3), 184–196. Scholar
  13. Glebe Community Development Project. (2004). Glebe: An older perspective. Accessed 21 May 2018.
  14. Glebe Youth Services. (2018). About us. Accessed 21 May 2018.
  15. Holland. (2001). A comprehensive model for assessing service-learning and community-university partnerships. New Directions for Higher Education, 2001(114), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Howard, J. (Ed.). (2001). Michigan journal of community service learning: Service-learning course design workbook (pp. 16–19). University of Michigan: OCSL Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kandiko, C. B., & Mawer, M. (2013). Student expectations and perceptions of higher education. London: King’s Learning Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Le, A. T., & Miller, P. W. (2005). Participation in higher education: Equity and access? The Economic Record, 81(253), 152–165. Scholar
  20. Ledwith, M. (2016). Community development in action: Putting Freire into practice. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  21. McIntosh, P. (1989, July/August). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack, peace and freedom (pp. 1–3).Google Scholar
  22. Micek, T. A., & Monseur, J. M. (2017). “It depends on the type of program”: Student perceptions of service-learning. In C. Crosby & F. Brockmeier (Eds.), Student experiences and educational outcomes in community engagement for the 21st century (pp. 58–84). Hershey: IGI Global. Scholar
  23. Milofsky, C. (2006). The catalyst process: What academics provide to practitioners. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16(4), 467–480. Scholar
  24. Noble, C. (2011). Ways of thinking about field education and supervision: Building a critical perspective. In C. Noble & M. Henrickson (Eds.), Social work field education and supervision across Asia Pacific. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rawsthorne, M., & de Pree, A. (2018). Are we welcome? Building trust through community-based research. In Á. K.-V. Til & G. Franger-Huhle (Eds.), University and society: Interdependencies and exchange. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Rawsthorne, M., Ellis, K., & de Pree, A. (2017). “Working with COW”: Social work supporting older women living in the community. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 60(1), 32–47. Scholar
  27. Rossiter, A. (2001). Innocence lost and suspicion found: Do we educate for or against social work? Critical Social Work, 2(1), 141–144.Google Scholar
  28. Saleeby, D., & Scanlon, E. (2005). Is a critical pedagogy for the profession of social work possible? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 25(3–4), 1–18. Scholar
  29. Schutte, T., Tichelaar, J., Dekker, R. S., van Agtmael, M. A., de Vries, R., & Richir, M. (2015). Learning in student-run clinics: A systematic review. Medical Education, 49, 249–263. Scholar
  30. Solling, M. (2007). Grandeur and grit: A history of glebe. Sydney: Halstead Press.Google Scholar
  31. Stenberg, K., Rajala, A., & Hilppo, J. (2016). Fostering theory–practice reflection in teaching practicums. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5), 470–485. Scholar
  32. Theobald, J., Gardner, F., & Long, N. (2017). Teaching critical reflection in social work field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(2), 300–311. Scholar
  33. University of Sydney. (2017). Glebe community development project. Accessed 21 May 2018.
  34. Warr, D., & Williams, D. (2016). Two steps forward, one step back: Achievements and limitations of university-community partnerships in addressing neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 9(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations