Advertisement

The Possibilities and Limits of “Open Journalism”: Journalist Engagement Below the Line at the Guardian 2006–2017

  • Todd Graham
  • Daniel JacksonEmail author
  • Scott Wright
Chapter

Abstract

Over the past two decades with the rise of digital media, newspapers across Western democracies have been increasingly adopting new forms of online participatory journalism. During this time, “below the line” comment spaces have grown to be one of the most popular forms of user-generated content. Comment spaces are thought to perform a multitude of functions. However, much has been made about their potential as spaces for public debate that could act as a new form of the public sphere where journalists can hear from, and directly engage with, their readers. Survey and interview research has suggested that some journalists do read, and sometimes engage in, comment sections. However, no study has systematically analysed how journalists actually engage in comment spaces; what factors shape such engagement; and how this has evolved over time. In this chapter, we begin to fill in these gaps by investigating how Guardian journalists behave below the line. Our research, which draws upon a multi-method approach and longitudinal research dataset, included a manual content analysis of all comments made (2006–2017) by 26 journalists (n = 5448) and 18 semi-structured interviews conducted in two phases (13 in 2012 and 5 repeated in 2017–2018). Our chapter sheds light on how journalists behave below the line and what this might mean for journalism practice in the digital age.

References

  1. Binns, A. (2012). Don’t Feed the Trolls! Managing Troublemakers in Magazines’ Online Communities. Journalism Practice, 6(4), 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borger, M., van Hoof, A., Costera Meijer, I., & Sanders, J. (2013). Constructing Participatory Journalism as a Scholarly Object: A Genealogical Analysis. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brems, C., Temmerman, M., Graham, T., & Broersma, M. (2017). Personal Branding on Twitter: How Employed and Freelance Journalists Stage Themselves on Social Media. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broersma, M. (2010). Journalism as a Performative Discourse. The Importance of Form and Style in Journalism. In V. Rupar (Ed.), Journalism and Meaning-Making: Reading the Newspaper (pp. 15–35). Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  5. Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2015). Tipping the Balance of Power Social Media and the Transformation of Political Journalism. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics (pp. 89–103). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruns, A. (2012). Journalists and Twitter: How Australian News Organisations Adapt to a New Medium. Media International Australia, 144(1), 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buell, E. H., Jr. (1975). Eccentrics or Gladiators? People Who Write About Politics in Letters-to-the-Editor. Social Science Quarterly, 56(3), 440–449.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, G. M., Pain, P., Chen, V. Y., Mekelburg, M., Springer, N., & Troger, F. 2018. ‘You Really Have to Have a Thick Skin’: A Cross-Cultural Perspective on How Online Harassment Influences Female Journalists. Journalism.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918768500.
  9. Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dailey, L., Demo, L., & Spillman, M. (2008). Newspaper Political Blogs Generate Little Interaction. Newspaper Research Journal, 29(4), 53–65.Google Scholar
  11. Deuze, M. (2003). The Web and its Journalisms: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of Newsmedia Online. New Media & Society, 5(2): 203–230.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domingo, D. (2008a). Interactivity in the Daily Routines of Online Newsrooms: Dealing with an Uncomfortable Myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 680–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Domingo, D. (2008b). When Immediacy Rules: Online Journalism Models in Four Catalan Online Newsrooms. In C. Paterson & D. Domingo (Eds.), Making Online News: The Ethnography of New Media Production (pp. 113–126). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008). Participatory Journalism Practices in the Media and Beyond: An International Comparative Study of Initiatives in Online Newspapers. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erjavec, K., & Kovačič, M. P. (2012). ‘You Don’t Understand, This Is a New War!’ Analysis of Hate Speech in News Web Sites’ Comments. Mass Communication and Society, 15(6), 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garden, M. (2016). Australian Journalist-Blogs: A Shift in Audience Relationships or Mere Window Dressing? New Media & Society, 17(3), 331–347.Google Scholar
  17. Gardiner, B. (2018). ‘It’s a Terrible Way to Go to Work:’ What 70 Million Readers’ Comments on the Guardian Revealed About Hostility to Women and Minorities Online. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 592–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardiner, B., Mansfield, M., Anderson, I., Holder, J., Louter, D., & Ulmanu, M. (2016, April 12). The Dark Side of Guardian Comments. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/12/the-dark-side-of-guardian-comments.
  19. Gillmor, D. (2004). We the Media. Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, T. (2013). Talking Back, But Is Anyone Listening? Journalism and Comment Fields. In C. Peters & M. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking Journalism: Trust and Participation in a Transformed News Landscape (pp. 114–127). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, T. (2015). Everyday Political Talk in the Internet-Based Public Sphere. In S. Coleman & D. Freelon (Eds.), Handbook of Digital Politics (pp. 247–263). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2014). Discursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of ‘Super-Participants’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2015). A Tale of Two Stories from ‘Below the Line’: Comment Fields at the Guardian. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(3), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2016). New Platform, Old Habits? Candidates’ Use of Twitter During the 2010 British and Dutch General Election Campaigns. New Media & Society, 18(5), 765–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grey, D. L., & Brown, T. R. (1970). Letters to the Editor: Hazy Reflections of Public Opinion. Journalism Quarterly, 47(3), 450–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hare, K. (2014, December 8). St. Louis Post-Dispatch Turns Off Comments on Editorials. ‘Why? Ferguson.’ The Poynter Institute. Retrieved from https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2014/st-louis-post-dispatch-turns-off-comments-on-editorials-why-ferguson/.
  28. Hart, J. A. (1970). Views on the News: The Developing Editorial Syndrome, 1500–1800. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hedman, U., & Djerf-Pierre, M. (2013). The Social Journalist: Embracing the Social Media Life or Creating a New Digital Divide? Digital Journalism, 1(3), 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hellmueller, L., Vos, T. P., & Poepsel, M. A. (2013). Shifting Journalistic Capital? Transparency and Objectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Journalism Studies, 14(3), 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hermida, A. (2010). Let’s Talk: How Blogging is Shaping the BBC’s Relationship with the Public. In G. Monaghan & S. Tunney (Eds.), Web Journalism: A New Form of Citizenship? (pp. 306–316). Eastbourne, UK: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hermida, A. (2011). Fluid Spaces, Fluid Journalism: Lessons in Participatory Journalism. In J. B. Singer, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, A. Hermida, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, et al. (Eds.), Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers (pp. 177–191). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hynds, E. C. (1994). Editors at Most U.S. Dailies See Vital Roles for Editorial Page. Journalism Quarterly, 71(3), 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ihlebæk, K. A., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2015). Editorial Power and Public Participation in Online Newspapers. Journalism, 16(4), 470–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joseph, N. L. (2011). Correcting the Record: The Impact of the Digital News Age on the Performance of Press Accountability. Journalism Practice, 5(6), 704–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kapoor, S. (1995). Most Papers Receive More Letters. The Masthead, 47(2), 5–9.Google Scholar
  37. Karlsson, M. (2010). Rituals of Transparency: Evaluating Online News Outlets’ Uses of Transparency Rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism Studies, 11(4), 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karlsson, M. (2011). The Immediacy of Online News, the Visibility of Journalistic Processes and a Restructuring of Journalistic Authority. Journalism, 12(3), 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lasorsa, D. (2012). Transparency and Other Journalistic Norms on Twitter: The Role of Gender. Journalism Studies, 13(3), 402–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism Practice in an Emerging Communication Space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lemert, J. B., & Larkin, J. (1979). Some Reasons Why Mobilizing Information Fails to be in Letters to the Editor. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lewis, S. C., Holton, A. E., & Coddington, M. (2014). Reciprocity Journalism: A Concept of Mutual Exchange Between Journalists and Audiences. Journalism Practice, 8(2), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, F. (2015). Getting My Two Cents Worth In: Access, Interaction, Participation and Social Inclusion in Online News Commenting. #ISOJ Journal, 5(1): 80–105. Retrieved from https://isojjournal.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/getting-my-two-cents-worth-in-access-interaction-participation-and-social-inclusion-in-online-news-commenting/.
  44. Molm, L. D. (2010). The Structure of Reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newman, N., & Levy, D. (2014). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2014: Tracking the Future of News. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/digital-news-report-2014.
  46. Nielsen, C. (2014). Coproduction or Cohabitation: Are Anonymous Online Comments on Newspaper Websites Shaping News Content? New Media & Society, 16(3), 470–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pavlik, J. (2001). Journalism and New Media. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pierson, E. (2015). Outnumbered but Well-Spoken: Female Commenters in the New York Times. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Vancouver, Canada, 1201–1213. New York: ACM. Retrieved from http://cs.stanford.edu/people/emmap1/cscw_paper.pdf.
  49. Pritchard, J. C., & Berkowitz, D. (1979). How Readers’ Letters May Influence Editors and News Emphasis: A Content Analysis of 10 Newspapers, 1948–1978. Journalism Quarterly, 56(2), 388–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Revers, M. (2014). The Twitterization of News Making: Transparency and Journalistic Professionalism. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 806–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Micó, J. L., Díaz-Noci, J., Meso, K., & Masip, P. (2011). Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rusbridger, A. (2012, February 29). The Guardian: A World of News at Your Fingertips. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/help/insideguardian/2012/feb/29/open-journalism-at-the-guardian.
  53. Santana, A. D. (2010, August 4). Conversation or Cacophony: Newspapers Reporters’ Attitudes Toward Online Reader Comments. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  54. Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or Vitriolic: The Effect of Anonymity on Civility in Online Newspaper Reader Comment Boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singer, J. B., Hermida, A., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., … Vujnovic, M. (2011). Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Usher, N. (2014). Making News at The New York Times. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2001). Letters to the Editor as a Forum for Public Deliberation: Modes of Publicity and Democratic Debate. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002a). The Normative-Economic Justification for Public Discourse: Letters to the Editor as a ‘Wide Open’ Forum. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002b). The Construction of the Public in Letters to the Editor: Deliberative Democracy and the Idiom of Insanity. Journalism, 3(2), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002c). Understanding the Conditions for Public Discourse: Four Rules for Selecting Letters to the Editor. Journalism Studies, 3(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net Surfers Don’t Ride Alone: Virtual Communities as Communities. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace (pp. 167–194). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Witschge, T. (2013). Digital Participation in News Media: ‘Minimalist’ Views Versus Meaningful Interaction. In R. Scullion, R. Gerodimos, D. Jackson, & D. Lilleker (Eds.), The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment (pp. 103–115). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Wright, S. (2012). Politics as Usual? Revolution, Normalization and a New Agenda for Online Deliberation. New Media & Society, 14(2), 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright, S., Graham, T., & Jackson, D. (2015). Third Space, Social Media, and Everyday Political Talk. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics (pp. 96–110). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Wright, S., Jackson, D., & Graham, T. (2019). When Journalists Go ‘Below the Line’: Comment Spaces at The Guardian (2006–2017). Journalism Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1632733

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Bournemouth UniversityPooleUK
  3. 3.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations