Different Perceptions Regarding the Education of Children in Care: The Perspectives of Teachers, Caregivers and Children in Residential Care

  • Carme MontserratEmail author
  • Joan Llosada-Gistau
  • Ferran Casas
  • Rosa Sitjes
Part of the Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research book series (CHIR, volume 22)


The education of children in care is seen differently by teachers, caregivers in residential homes, and by the children themselves, and differences may be evident and highly significant with the impact that this entails. A pilot project aimed at improving the schoolbased learning of children in residential care was conducted within the framework of a European Project together with 5 Organizations working in Austria, Croatia, France, Germany and Spain. Program assessment included pre-post design and, on analysing pretest data, we established the objective of finding out more about the social inclusion in school of youth in residential care. More specifically, our goals were to evaluate: (a) peer relationships and acceptance; (b) the participation of youth in care in activities that most of their classmates do, and (c) to find out if youth in care like going to school and feel safe there. Three stakeholders were involved in these three objectives (N = 219): adolescents in residential care aged 12–17 years old and their teachers and caregivers. They were given a questionnaire with the same questions for data to be contrasted. Data matches could be analysed as each teacher and caregiver evaluated the situation of each youngster participating in the research. Findings showed how adolescents evaluated these school-related matters significantly more positively than their teachers, but differences were even more significant when compared to caregivers, who revealed a largely pessimistic outlook, with implications for consequent practices and policy-making. In addition, data matching showed little agreement between adult and adolescents’ responses. Not only does this assessment reveal how children in residential care experience school, but it may also provide insight into the social construction of the education of children in care and whether it is seen as a problem or, by contrast, as an opportunity.


Perceptions Education Children-in-care Teachers Carers 



BTG – Federal Association of Therapeutic Communities (Austria); Play Association.

(Croatia); Parrains par Mille (France); S&S GEM. Gesellschaft für Soziales MBH (Germany), and Plataforma Educativa (Spain).


Erasmus + project: 2016-1-ES01-KA201-025021: Sapere Aude Project-Improvement of school results of youngsters in care through mentoring.


  1. Berger, L. M., Cancian, M., Han, E., Noyes, J., & Rios-Salas, V. (2015). Children’s academic achievement and foster care. Pediatrics, 135(1), 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CELCIS. (2015). Looked after and learning. improving the learning journey of looked after children. Glasgow, Scotland: University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  3. Darmody, M., McMahon, L., Banks, J., & Gilligan, R. (2013). Education of children in care in Ireland: an exploratory study. Dublin, Republic of Ireland: Ombudsman for Children.Google Scholar
  4. Davidson-Arad, B., Dekel, R., & Wozner, Y. (2004). Correspondence in residents’ and staff members’ assessments of the quality of life of children in residential care facilities. Social Indicators Research, 68(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Department for Education. (2015). Children looked after in England, year ending 31st March 2015. Retrieved from:
  6. Dill, K., Flynn, R. J., Hollingshead, M., & Fernandes, A. (2012). Improving the educational achievement of young people in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1081–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forsman, H., Brännström, L., Vinnerljung, B., & Hjern, A. (2016). Does poor school performance cause later psychosocial problems among children in foster care? Evidence from national longitudinal registry data. Child Abuse & Neglect, 57, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (Eds.). (2014). Improving access to further and higher education for young people in public care. European policy and practice. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Landis, J., & Kock, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martín, E., Muñoz de Bustillo, M. C., Rodríguez, T., & Pérez, Y. (2008). De la residencia a la escuela: la integración social de los menores en acogimiento residencial con el grupo de iguales en el contexto escolar. Psicothema, 20(3), 376–382.Google Scholar
  11. McNamara, P., Harvey, A., & Andrewartha, L. (2017). Passports out of poverty: Raising access to higher education for care leavers in Australia. Children and Youth Services Review. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2006). Kinship foster care from the perspective of quality of life: Research on the satisfaction of the stakeholders. Applied Research in quality of life, 1, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2018). The education of children and adolescents in out-ofhome care: A problem or an opportunity? Results of a longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Work, 21(5), 750–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Montserrat, C., Casas, F., & Baena, M. (2015). La educación de los niños, niñas y adolescentes en el sistema de protección. ¿Un problema o una oportunidad? Girona, Spain: Documenta Universitaria.Google Scholar
  15. O’Higgins, A., Sebba, J., & Luke, N. (2015). What is the relationship between being in care and the educational outcomes of children? An international systematic review. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Rees Centre for Research in Fostering and Education.Google Scholar
  16. Sebba, J., Berridge, D., Luke, N., Fletcher, J., Bell, K., Strand, S., et al. (2015). The Educational Progress of Looked After Children in England: Linking Care and Educational Data. Oxford, UK/Bristol, UK/London: The Rees Centre, The University of Bristol and The Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Wise, S., & Connolly, M. (2014). Using early childhood development research in child protection: Benefits, boundaries and blind spots. Developing Practice: The Child, Youth and Family Work Journal, 39, 15–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carme Montserrat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joan Llosada-Gistau
    • 1
  • Ferran Casas
    • 1
  • Rosa Sitjes
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute on Quality of LifeUniversity of GironaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations