Advertisement

Introduction

  • R. Eljalill Tauschinsky
Chapter

Abstract

Delegated and implementing acts are ubiquitous forms of EU rule-making. However, the Treaties do not contain much information on what they are and how they are to be adopted. This chapter will show that delegated and implementing acts constitute relevant rule-making exercises and provide a background discussion on their adoption.

References

  1. Alemanno A, Meeuwse A (2013) Impact assessment of EU non-legislative rulemaking: the missing link in ‘New Comitology’. Eur Law J 19(1):76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bast J (2012) New categories of acts after the Lisbon Reform: dynamics of parliamentarization in EU law. Common Market Law Rev 49:885Google Scholar
  3. Blair MM, Stout LA (2001) Trust, trustworthiness, and the behavioral foundations of corporate law. Univ Pa Law Rev 149(6):1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chamon M (2016) Institutional balance and community method in the implementation of EU legislation following the Lisbon Treaty. Common Market Law Rev 53:1501Google Scholar
  5. Christiansen T, Dobbels M (2013) Non-legislative rule making after the Lisbon Treaty: implementing the new system of comitology and delegated acts. Eur Law J 19(1):42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig P (2010) The Lisbon Treaty; law, politics and treaty reform. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craig P (2011) Delegated acts, implementing acts and the new comitology regulation. Eur Law Rev 36(5):671Google Scholar
  8. Craig P (2016) Comitology, rulemaking and the Lisbon Settlement: tensions and strains. In: Bergström CF, Ritleng D (eds) Rulemaking by the European Commission: the new system for delegation of powers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtin D (1997) Postnational democracy. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, p 7 et seqGoogle Scholar
  10. Decent EF (2014) Fiduciary authority and the service conception. In: Gold A, Miller P (eds) Philosophical foundations of fiduciary law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. den Heijer M, Tauschinsky E (2013) Where human rights meet administrative law: essential elements and limits to delegation: European Court of Justice, Grand Chamber C-355/10: European Parliament v. Council of the European Union. Eur Const Law Rev 9(3):513Google Scholar
  12. Egeberg M (2007) The European Commission. In: Cini M (ed) European Union politics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Føllesdal A, Hix S (2006) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik. J Common Market Stud 44(3):533Google Scholar
  14. Greenwood J (2011) Interest representation in the European Union, 3rd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofmann H (2009) Legislation, delegation and implementation under the Treaty of Lisbon: typology meets reality. Eur Law J 15(4):482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Judge D, Earnshaw D (2002) The European Parliament and the commission crisis: a new assertiveness? Governance 15(3):345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kroell T (2011) Delegierte Rechtsetzung und Durchführungsrechtsetzung und das institutionelle Gleichgewicht der Europäischen Union. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 66:253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larsson T (2003) Precooking in the European Union: the World of Expert Groups. Regeringskansliet, Stockholm, p 14Google Scholar
  19. Majone G (2002) The European Commission: the limits of centralization and the Perils of Parliamentarization. Governance 15(3):375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nugent N (2000) At the Heart of the Union: studies of the European Commission, 2nd edn. Palgrave McMillanGoogle Scholar
  21. Schotel B (2013) Legislation, empirical research and juridical law. Theory Pract Legis 1(3):501Google Scholar
  22. Schütze R (2011) ‘Delegated’ Legislation in the (new) European Union: a constitutional analysis. Mod Law Rev 74(5):661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tauschinsky E (2018) Managing choice: a close look at the differentiation of delegated and implementing acts. Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien 21(3):305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsakatika M (2005) Claims to legitimacy: the European Commission between continuity and change. J Common Market Stud 43(1):193Google Scholar
  25. Wille A (2013) The normalization of the European Commission: politics and bureaucracy in the EU executive. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zdobnoh D (2018) Competition between articles 290 and 291 TFEU: what are these two articles about? In: Tauschinsky E, Weiß W (eds) The legislative choice between delegated and implementing acts in EU law – walking a Labyrinth. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Eljalill Tauschinsky
    • 1
  1. 1.WalldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations