Advertisement

Charity as Civic Participation for Dutch–Turkish Muslims

  • Yağiz Cebecioglu
Chapter
Part of the New Directions in Islam book series (NDI)

Abstract

This chapter argues that charity, in the sense that is inclusive of giving time and effort to volunteering, is considered a way of engaging with society for Dutch–Turkish Muslims in the Netherlands as well as a complementary element of their piety. Focusing on Muslims affiliated with two Islamic movements, the Gülen Movement and Millî Görüş (National Outlook), this analysis will show they are in a reciprocal interaction with both their religious communities and the Dutch society, in which they seek to actively participate. Building on previous scholarship on the religious movements and European Muslims, this chapter comparatively analyzes the relationship between forms of pieties prescribed by these movements and how their constituencies interpret, practice, and reflect on charity and volunteering in a Western context.

References

  1. Agai, B. (2007). Islam and Education in Secular Turkey: State Policies and the Emergence of the Fethullah Gulen Group. In R. W. Hefner & M. Qasim Zaman (Eds.), Schooling Islam: The Culture and Politics of Modern Muslim Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Azak, U. (2009). Islamitische organizaties van Turkse migranten in Nederland. In S. Vellenga, S. Harchoui, H. El Mankouri, & B. Seijses (Eds.), Mist in de polder. Zicht op ontwikkelingen omtrent de Islam in Nederland. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
  3. Bataille, G. (1991). The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy. Volume 1: Consumption. New York, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bekkers, R., & Carbain, C. L. (2011). Religious and Secular Volunteering: A Comparison Between Immigrants and Non-immigrants in the Netherlands. Voluntary Sector Review, 2(1), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benthall, J. (2016). Islamic Charities and Islamic Humanism in Troubled Times. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bluhdorn, I. (2006). Self-Experience in the Theme Parc of Radical Action. Social Movements and Political Articulation in the Late-Modern Condition. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant, W. K., Jeon-Slaughter, H., Kang, H., & Tax, A. (2003). Participation in Philanthropic Activities: Donating Money and Time. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(1), 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Çelik, G. (2011). The Gülen Movement: Building Social Cohesion Through Dialogue and Education. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  9. Das, V. (2014). Ethics, the Householder’s Dilemma, and the Difficulty of Reality. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deeb, L. (2006). An Enchanted Modern. Gender and Public Piety in Shi’i Lebanon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Derrida, J. (1992). Given Time: Counterfeit Money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, M. (1990). Foreword. In M. Mauss (Ed.), The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies (pp. ix–xxiii). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Driskell, R. L., Lyon, L., & Embry, E. (2008). Civic Engagement and Religious Activities. Examining the Influence of Religious Tradition and Participation. Sociological Spectrum, 28(5), 578–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ebaugh, H. R. (2010). The Hizmet Movement: A Sociological Analysis of a Civic Movement Rooted in Moderate Islam. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Fassin, D. (2012). Humanitarian Reason. A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Göle, N. (1999). The Forbidden Modern: Civilization and Veiling. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. Guinea-Martin, D. (2014). Compassionate and Egalitarian. The Charity Paradox in Two Voluntary Associations. Ethnography, 15(4), 540–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gülen, F. (2006). Essays, Perspectives, Opinions. Clifton, NJ: Light.Google Scholar
  19. Henkel, H. (2004). Rethinking the dar’al harb: Social Change and Changing Perceptions of the West in Turkish Islam. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(5), 961–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hintz, L. (2018). Identity Politics Inside Out: National Identity Contestation and Foreign Policy in Turkey. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirschkind, C. (2001). Civic Virtue and Religious Reason: An Islamic Counterpublic. Cultural Anthropology, 16(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huijnk, W. (2018). De religieuze beleving van moslims in Nederland: Diversiteit en verandering in beeld. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  23. Izutsu, T. (2007). Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Quran. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University.Google Scholar
  24. Kayikci, M. R. (2016). Giving in God’s Name: Investing in the Ethical Self in the Case of the Kermes. Contemporary Islam: Dynamics of Muslim Life, 10(3), 455–476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-016-0362-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keane, W. (2016). Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krespin, R. S. (2009). Fethullah Gülen’s Grand Ambition: Turkey’s Islamist Danger. Middle East Quarterly, 16(Winter), 55–66.Google Scholar
  27. Kuru, A. (2001). Book Review ‘The Forbidden Modern: Civilization and Veiling by Nilüfer Göle. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 22(1), 181–183.Google Scholar
  28. Kuru, A. (2003). Fethullah Gülen’s Search for a Middle Way: Between Modernity and Muslim Tradition. In H. Yavuz & J. Esposito (Eds.), Secular State and Islam in Turkey: The Gülen Movement (pp. 115–130). New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Laidlaw, J. (2000). A Free Gift Makes No Friends. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(4), 617–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laidlaw, J. (2014). The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Leman, J. (2010). The Flexible and Multilayered Character of ‘Hizmet’ (Social Service) Movement in Immigration. A Case Study in Belgium. In Mapping the Gülen Movement. A Multidimensional Approach (Conference Papers) (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam: Dialoog Academie.Google Scholar
  32. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mandaville, P. (2001). Transnational Muslim Politics. Remaining the Ummah. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Mauss, M. (2002 [1954]). The Gift: Forms and Functions in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Mittermaier, A. (2014). Beyond Compassion, Islamic Voluntarism in Egypt. American Ethnologist, 41(3), 518–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mittermaier, A. (2019). Giving to God Islamic Charity in Revolutionary Times. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Odmalm, P. (2009). Turkish Organizations in Europe: How National Contexts Provide Different Avenues for Participation. Turkish Studies, 10(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  39. Rahman, F. (1983). Some Key Ethical Concepts of the Quran. Journal of Religious Ethics, 11(2), 170–185.Google Scholar
  40. Rahman, F. (2009). Major Themes of the Quran. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Seufert, G. (1999). Die Millî Görüş Bewegung (AMGT/IGMG) zwischen Integration und Isolation. In G. Seufert & J. Waardenburg (Eds.), Türkischer Islam in Europe (pp. 295–321). Istanbul: Steiner.Google Scholar
  42. Sunier, T., & Landman, N. (2014). Turkse islam. Actualisatie van kennis over Turkse religieuze stromingen en organisaties in Nederland: Een literatuurstudie in opdracht van het Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.fsw.vu.nl/en/Images/TRSO_rapport_SunierLandman_2014_tcm250-421419.pdf.
  43. Sunier, T., & Landman, N. (2015). Transnational Turkish Islam: Shifting Geographies of Religious Activism and Community Building in Turkey and Europe. London and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tol, G. (2009). What Type of Islamism for Europe? Islamism in Germany and the Netherlands. Insight Turkey, 11(11), 133–149.Google Scholar
  45. Vallely, A. (2002). Moral Landscapes. Ethical Discourses Among Orthodox and Diaspora Jains. In M. Lambek (Ed.), A Reader in the Anthropology of Religion (pp. 555–570). Maine, Oxford and Victoria: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Vertovec, S., & Cohen, R. (1999). Migration, Diasporas and Transnationalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  47. Wang, L., & Handy, F. (2014). Religious and Secular Voluntary Participation by Immigrants in Canada: How Trust and Social networks Affect Decision to Participate. Voluntas (International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations), 25(6), 1559–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weber, M. (1963). The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, J., & Janoski, T. (1995). The Contribution of Religion to Volunteer Work. Sociology of Religion, 56(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yavuz, H. (2013). Towards and Islamic Enlightenment: The Gülen Movement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yukleyen, A. (2012). Localizing Islam in Europe. Turkish Islamic Communities in Germany and the Netherlands. New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yağiz Cebecioglu
    • 1
  1. 1.Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations