Advertisement

How Might Faith Communities Promote Desistance from Sexual Crime? An Exploration of Theory

  • Stephanie KewleyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sexual Crime book series (SEXCR)

Abstract

This chapter considers a number of theories that help our understanding of the desistance process for those convicted of sexual offending; in particular, it contemplates how a faith or a religious context might serve as a mechanism to help foster a process of desistance. The chapter first briefly outlines the current rehabilitation landscape highlighting why there is a need to consider informal rehabilitation approaches such as those available in faith communities. Following this, the Good Lives Model (GLM) is presented and serves as a foundation to support the case that a religious context may help promote the desistance process for those convicted of sexual offending. Following this, a range of theories from the desistance literature is also included. In conclusion, when knitted together, GLM and desistance theories are strengthened and support the notion that informal structures (such as religious communities) ought to be capitalised upon and used in conjunction with formal risk management measures.

References

  1. Andrews, D. A., & James, B. (2016). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauregard, E., Rossmo, D. K., & Proulx, J. (2007). A descriptive model of the hunting process of serial sex offenders: A rational choice perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 22(6), 449–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, K., Winder, B., & Blagden, N. (2018). ‘Better as a Buddhist’: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the reflections on the religious beliefs of Buddhist men serving a prison sentence for a sexual offence. Religions, 9(4), 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernasco, W., Johnson, S. D., & Ruiter, S. (2015). Learning where to offend: Effects of past on future burglary locations. Applied Geography, 60, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Farrington, D. (1988). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.Google Scholar
  9. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25(4), 933–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Criminal Justice Act (c.44). (2003).Google Scholar
  11. Criminal Justice Act (Sections 325 to 327). (2003).Google Scholar
  12. De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2017). How psychological dispositions influence the theology of the afterlife. In Y. Nagasawa & B. Matheson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the afterlife (pp. 435–453). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeMichele, M., & Payne, B. (2018). Taking officer time seriously: A study of the daily activities of probation officers. Probation Journal, 65(1), 39–60.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550517748358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durkheim, E. (1951 [1897]). Suicide. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Farmer, M., McAlinden, A.-M., & Maruna, S. (2016). Sex offending and situational motivation: Findings from a qualitative analysis of desistance from sexual offending. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(15), 1756–1775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrall, S., Bottoms, A., & Shapland, J. (2010). Social structures and desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 7(6), 546–570.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810376574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrall, S., Hunter, B., Sharpe, G., & Calverley, A. (2014). Criminal careers in transition: The social context of desistance from crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flynn, N. (2011). Criminal behaviour in context: Space, place and desistance from crime. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Giordano, P. C. (2016). Mechanisms underlying the desistance process: Reflections on ‘a theory of cognitive transformation’. In J. Shapland, D. Farrington, & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Global perspectives on desistance (pp. 27–43). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1086/343191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giordano, P. C., Longmore, M. A., Schroeder, R. D., & Seffrin, P. M. (2008). A life-course perspective on spirituality and desistance from crime. Criminology, 46(1), 99–132.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00104.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61–139). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  25. Hallett, M., & McCoy, J. S. (2015). Religiously motivated desistance: An exploratory study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(8), 855–872.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Retrieved from http://jiv.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/03/20/0886260514526062.abstract;  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514526062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanson, R., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Thornton, D., Babchishin, K. M., & Harris, A. J. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(9), 1148–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kewley, S., Beech, A. R., & Harkins, L. (2015). Examining the role of faith community groups with sexual offenders: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 142–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kewley, S., Larkin, M., Harkins, L., & Beech, A. R. (2016). Restoring identity: The use of religion as a mechanism to transition between an identity of sexual offending to a non-offending identity. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 17(1), 79–96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816654530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kewley, S., Larkin, M., Harkins, L., & Beech, A. R. (2018). Incarcerated child sexual offenders and the reinvention of self through religious and spiritual affiliation. In K. R. Kerley (Ed.), Finding freedom in confinement: The role of religion in prison life (pp. 366–394). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. King, S. (2013). Assisted desistance and experiences of probation supervision. Probation Journal, 60(2), 136–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550513478320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kingston, S., & Thomas, T. (2018). The sexual risk order and the sexual harm prevention order: The first two years. Probation Journal, 65(1), 77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550517748359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17(1), 61–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000094481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laws, D. R. (2003). The rise and fall of relapse prevention. Australian Psychologist, 38(1), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2011). Desistance from sex offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Levenson, J., Ackerman, A. R., Socia, K. M., & Harris, A. J. (2015). Where for art thou? Transient sex offenders and residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(4), 319–344.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403413512326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levenson, J., D’Amora, D., & Hern, A. (2007). Megan’s Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(4), 587–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levenson, J. S., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community reentry. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lussier, P., & Healey, J. (2009). Rediscovering Quetelet, again: The “aging” offender and the prediction of reoffending in a sample of adult sex offenders. Justice Quarterly, 26(4), 827–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-offenders reform and reclaim their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maruna, S., & Immarigeon, R. (2004). After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McAlinden, A.-M., Farmer, M., & Maruna, S. (2017). Desistance from sexual offending: Do the mainstream theories apply? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17(3), 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McNeill, F. (2014, May 15). University of Sheffield Centre for Criminological Research seminar series on ‘Coping with Crime: Citizens and Government’. Seminar 4: How best to stop offenders reoffending and reintegrate them into civil society. Paper presented at the British Academy in London.Google Scholar
  48. Melemis, S. M. (2015). Relapse prevention and the five rules of recovery. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 88(3), 325–332.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Nicholaichuk, T. P., Olver, M. E., Gu, D., & Wong, S. C. (2014). Age, actuarial risk, and long-term recidivism in a national sample of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 26(5), 406–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Bushway, S., Kerrison, E., & O’Connell, D. (2015). Human agency and explanations of criminal desistance: Arguments for a rational choice theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(3), 209–235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0013-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156. ISSN: 0091-4169/09/9904-1103.Google Scholar
  52. Perrin, C., Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Norman, C. (2018). Religion and desistance: Working with sexual and violent offenders. Finding freedom in confinement: The role of religion in prison life (p. 24). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  53. Purvis, M., Ward, T., & Willis, G. (2011). The good lives model in practice: Offence pathways and case management. European Journal of Probation, 3(2), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, B. T., Padgett, D. K., Choy-Brown, M., & Henwood, B. F. (2015). Rebuilding lives and identities: The role of place in recovery among persons with complex needs. Health & Place, 33, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Socia, K. M., & Rydberg, J. (2016). Sex offender legislation and policy. In T. G. Blomberg, J. Brancale, K. M. Beaver, & W. D. Bales (Eds.), Advancing criminology and criminal justice policy (pp. 187–202). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 93–159). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. (1995). The theory of differential association. In N. J. Herman (Ed.), Deviance: A symbolic interactionist approach (pp. 64–68). Oxford: General Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Information (International Social Science Council), 13(2), 65–93.  https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tewksbury, R., & Zgoba, K. (2009). Perceptions and coping with punishment: How registered sex offenders respond to stress, internet restrictions, and the collateral consequences of registration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(4), 537–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas, T. (2010). The sex offender register, community notification and some reflections on privacy. In K. Harrison (Ed.), Managing high-risk sex offenders in the community: Risk management, treatment and social responsibility (pp. 61–78). Portland: Wilan Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Ward, T., & Gannon, T. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(1), 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ward, T., Gannon, T. A., & Birgden, A. (2007). Human rights and the treatment of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(3), 195–216.Google Scholar
  64. Ward, T., Mann, R. E., & Gannon, T. A. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 87–107.Google Scholar
  65. Ward, T., & Marshall, B. (2007). Narrative identity and offender rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(3), 279–297.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x06291461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L., & Beech, A. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  68. Ward, T., & Stewart, C. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(4), 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weaver, B. (2015). Offending and desistance: The importance of social relations. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Liverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations