Advertisement

Social Relationship Ranking on the Smart Internet

  • Anandakumar Haldorai
  • Arulmurugan Ramu
  • Suriya Murugan
Chapter
Part of the Urban Computing book series (UC)

Abstract

The changes in population demography and technology have made social connections more and more difficult, although fundamental to human nature, health, and well-being. A review of the theory and measurement evolution of social relations and their early empirical evidence is analyzed in this chapter. We consider how social relationships have changed over time and how the fundamental characteristics of social relations have shifted through analysis of different techniques for the digital ranking. The emerging impact of technology on contacts, particularly on the evolving ways in which technology can be used to strengthen, decrease, maintain, or prevent social relations is also discussed. The role and influence of the smart Internet in the negative as well as in the positive aspects of these new technologies on the well-being of smart people are elaborated. Successful navigation of our complex social environment calls for the ability to identify and judge others’ relativity. Social comparison processes are therefore very important and contribute to intelligent individuals and urban development for efficient interpersonal decision-making.

Keywords

Smart city Smart people Collaborative ranking Social relationships Urban computing Machine learning Smart Internet 

References

  1. 1.
    Anthopoulos, L., Fitsilis, P.: Social networks in smart cities: comparing evaluation models. In: 2015 IEEE First International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). IEEE, Piscataway (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/isc2.2015.7366206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rabadiya, K., Makwana, A., Jardosh, S.: Revolution in networks of smart objects: social internet of things. In: 2017 International Conference on Soft Computing and Its Engineering Applications (icSoftComp). IEEE, Piscataway (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icsoftcomp.2017.8280086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rafailidis, D., Crestani, F.: Collaborative ranking with social relationships for top-N recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR ‘16. IEEE, Piscataway (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2911451.2914711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao, H., Liu, H.: Data analysis on location-based social networks. In: Mobile Social Networking, pp. 165–194. Springer, New York (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8579-7_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quadri, C., Gaito, S., Rossi, G.P.: Big-data inspired, proximity-aware 4G/5G service supporting urban social interactions. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP). IEEE, Piscataway (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/smartcomp.2016.7501680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lane, G.: Urban tapestries: wireless networking, public authoring and social knowledge. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 7(3–4), 169–175 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-003-0229-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, K.Y., Hong, J.L.: A user survey on search ranking algorithm for social networking sites. In: 2012 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. IEEE, Piscataway (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/fskd.2012.6234068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park, G., Lee, S., Lee, S.: To enhance web search based on topic Sensitive_social Relationship ranking algorithm in Social networks. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE, Piscataway (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/wi-iat.2009.322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma, C., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Gui, H., Zhu, W., Shi, X., Li, X.: An approach to social relationship ranking on internet-based social platforms by tempo-spatial data mining using location prediction technique. In: IEEE International Congress on Big Data. IEEE, Piscataway (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdatacongress.2015.56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    LIU, K.-P., FANG, B.-X.: A novel page ranking algorithm based on social annotations. Chin. J. Comput. 33(6), 1014–1023 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1016.2010.01014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ertam, F.: Analysis of Data Using Machine Learning Approaches in Social Networks. International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK). IEEE, Piscataway (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ubmk.2017.8093537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Psomakelis, E., Aisopos, F., Litke, A., Tserpes, K., Kardara, M., Campo, P.M.: Big IoT and social networking data for smart cities - algorithmic improvements on big data analysis in the context of RADICAL City applications. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science. Cornell University, Ithaca (2016).  https://doi.org/10.5220/0005934503960405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mora, H., Pérez-delHoyo, R., Paredes-Pérez, J., Mollá-Sirvent, R.: Analysis of social networking service data for smart urban planning. Sustainability. 10(12), 4732 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williamson, W., Ruming, K.: Using social network analysis to visualize the social-media networks of community groups: two case studies from Sydney. J Urban Technol. 23(3), 69–89 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2016.1197490CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringSri Eshwar College of EngineeringCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringPresidency UniversityYelahanka, BengaluruIndia
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringKPR Institute of Engineering and TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations