Approaches to a European Republic

  • Thilo ZimmermannEmail author


Republican theory has observed a remarkable revival in political philosophy in recent years. The insights of the republican contributions could also be fruitful for European integration, if they are separated from communitarian believes and if republicanism and public good theory a combined in a coherent way. Especially the concept of a “res publica of public goods” seems to be a promising approach; however, some construction sides remain in order to make the approach applicable to European integration.


  1. Anderheiden, M. (2006). Gemeinwohl in Republik und Union. Jus Publicum (Vol. 152). Tuebingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  2. Bailyn, B. (1967). The ideological origins of the American revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (2006). Against reviving republicanism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 5(2), 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cicero, M. T. (1841). The political works of Marcus Tullius Cicero: Comprising his treatise on the commonwealth; and his treatise on the laws. London: Francis Barham Edmund Spettigue, 1842.Google Scholar
  5. Coeure, B., & Pisani-Ferry, J. (2007). The governance of the European Union’s international economic relations: How many voices? In Sapir, Andre, editor, Fragmented power: Europe and the global economy. Brussels: Brugel.Google Scholar
  6. Collignon, S. (2003). The European Republic. London: The Federal Trust Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Collignon, S. (2007). Bundesrepublik Europa?: Die demokratische Herausforderung und Europas Krise. Berlin: Berliner vorwaerts Verlagsgesellschaft. ISBN 9783866021150.Google Scholar
  8. Collignon, S. (2008a). Deliberation and stochastic consensus. 14 May 2019.
  9. Collignon, S. (2008b). Sovereignty, democracy and the Euro. 14 May 2019.
  10. Collignon, S. (2011). The governance of European public goods. In D. Tarschys (Ed.), The EU budget. What should go in? What should go out? (Nr. 3/2011, pp. 42–57). Stockholm: SIEPS-Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  11. Collignon, S. (2012b). The preconditions of social Europe. In H. Meyer & J. Rutherford (Eds.), The future of European social democracy (pp. 39–56). Berlin: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collignon, S. (2013). Die EU als Republik. Europarecht – Nomos, Beiheft 1, 131–153. 18 February 2015.
  13. Collignon, S. (2017). The European Union as a republic. In The governance of European public goods. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, R. (1972). Economic interdependence and foreign policy in the seventies. World Politics, 24(2), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dagger, R. 2011. Republicanism. In G. Klosko (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of political philosophy (pp. 701–711). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. European Parliament. (1994). Constitutions of European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C61, 155–170.Google Scholar
  17. Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grande, E. (1997). Post-nationale Demokratie – Ein Ausweg aus der Globalisierungsfalle? Comparativ, 7(2), 17–33.Google Scholar
  19. Grimm, D. (1995). Braucht Europa eine Verfassung? Braucht Europa eine Verfassung?, 50(12), 581–591.Google Scholar
  20. Guerot, U. (2016). Warum Europa eine Republik werden muss!. Bonn: Dietz.Google Scholar
  21. Guerot, U. (2017). Die Republik muss europäisch werden! Forum Wissenschaft, 34(2), 26–29.Google Scholar
  22. Guerot, U. (2018). Kann es ein demokratisches Europa geben und wenn ja, wie? Forschunhsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 31(1–2), 330–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guerot, U., & Menasse, R. (2013). Zukunft Europas – Es lebe die europäische Republik, (, 2013). 12 May 2019.
  24. Habermas, J. (1996). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen – Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  25. Hartz, L. (1955). The liberal tradition in America – An interpretation of American political thought since the revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  26. Hoelzing, P. (2014). Der Republikanismus in der Politischen Theorie und Ideengeschichte. ZPTh – Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie, 5(10), 11–30.Google Scholar
  27. Kaul, I., & Mendoza, R. U. (2003). Advancing the concept of public goods. In I. Kaul (Ed.), Providing global public goods: Managing globalization (pp. 78–111). New York: United Nations Development Programme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. König, T. (2005). Die Europäische Republik – so nah und wohl doch so fern? Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 12(2), 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laeufer, T. (1994). Zur künftigen Verfassung der Europäischen Union – Notwendigkeit einer offenen Debatte. Integration, 17(4), 204–214.Google Scholar
  30. Lovett, F., & Pettit, P. (2009). Neorepublicanism: A normative and institutional research program. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marti, J. L., & Pettit, P. (2010). A political philosophy in public life – Civic republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Michelman, F. (1988). Law’s republic. The Yale Law Journal, 97, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism – A theory of freedom and government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian moment – Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rosati, M. (2000). Freedom from domination: The republican revival. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 26(3), 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schachtschneider, K. (1997). Die Republik Europas – Drei an Kants Friedensschrift orientierte Integrationsmodelle. Aufklärung und Kritik, 20, 84 ff.Google Scholar
  37. Schachtschneider, K. (1999). Demokratiedefizite in der Europäischen Union. In Währungsunion und Weltwirtschaft – Festschrift für Wilhelm Hankel (pp. 119–147). Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius.Google Scholar
  38. Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism (Volume Reprint. (twice)). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sunstein, C. R. (1988). Beyond the republican revival. The Yale Law Journal, 97(8), 1539–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thiel, T. (2008). Braucht Europa eine Verfassung? Einige Anmerkungen zur Grimm-Habermas-Debatte. In M. Biegi, J. Förster, H. R. Otten, & T. Philipp (Eds.), Demokratie, Recht und Legitimität im 21. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  41. Thiel, T. (2011). Die Europäische Union – eine republikanische Ordnung? In R. Gröschner & O. W. Lembcke (Eds.), Freistaatlichkeit: Prinzipien eines europäischen Republikanismus (pp. 245–267). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Politika, 6.Google Scholar
  42. Thiel, T. (2012). Republikanismus und die Europäische Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. von Bogdandy, A. (2005). Die europäische Republik. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 36, 21–27.Google Scholar
  44. Wegen, G., & Kuner, C. (1994). Germany – Federal constitutional court decision concerning the Maastricht treaty. International Legal Materials, 33(2), 388–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U. R., & Mayer, F. C. (1995). European democracy and its critique. West European Politics, 18(3), 4–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wood, G. S. (1969). The creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CologneGermany

Personalised recommendations