The „Plan“ and „Structure of the House“: Developing the Basic Model

  • Wolfgang LasslEmail author


This chapter describes how the organization’s basic plan (i.e., its “blueprint”) is developed. It starts with the question of how one correctly identifies the systems 1 and it continues with the aggregation of the basic systems 1 and with the formation of higher recursion levels. To this end, this chapter provides an evaluation process for the various aggregation options and a list of relevant aggregation criteria that should be considered. On a more theoretical level, this chapter explains the function of organizational structures and details the difference between hierarchical and recursion levels (see also volume 2).


  1. Beer, S. (1995). Diagnosing the system for organizations of organization. The managerial cybernetics of organization. Chichester [West Sussex], New York: Wiley. (Figures 21, 25 and 37 republished with permission of John Wiley and Sons Inc. and the permission conveyed through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.).Google Scholar
  2. Drucker, P. F. (1993). Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices (1st HarperBusiness ed). New York: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  3. Hoverstadt, P. (2008). The fractal organization: Creating sustainable organizations with the Viable System Model. Chichester, UK, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Luhmann, N. (1987). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie (1. Aufl.). Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft: Vol. 666. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. Pérez Ríos, J. (2012). Design and diagnosis for sustainable organizations: The viable system method. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Robinett, J., et al. (2019). 2018 Theme index museum index: Global attractions attendance report. Themed Entertainment Association (TEA); Economics practice at AECOM. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pure Management GroupViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations