The Social Impact of Corporate Citizenship Programs on Their Beneficiaries and Society at Large: A Case Study
Within their corporate citizenship program (CCP) “Future Matters,” Nationale-Nederlanden (NN) runs several community investment programs. One of these programs is the Social Innovation Relay (SIR). SIR is a partnership with Junior Achievement Europe and exists of a highly developed international network of corporate volunteer employees and students. SIR aims to increase entrepreneurial competences, practical business experiences, and financial resilience of young people by entrepreneurship education. Available research about employee volunteering (EV) mainly focused on indicating and showing its positive effects in CCPs on the employee and the organization. Unfortunately, knowledge about the effect of EV on the target group and society at large is less developed. In this study, we aim to bridge this research gap by assessing the impact of the program on the SIR participants. We found that the beneficiaries of the SIR program indeed show more entrepreneurial intention, behavior, and social awareness. Our findings show that the main results are achieved during the first phase of the program. Because the skills and characteristics of entrepreneurial behavior of the beneficiaries increase during the program, we can argue that it is likely that NN creates social impact for the beneficiaries with their program.
KeywordsSocial impact Corporate citizenship Quantitative research Experiment
The authors would like to thank Nationale-Nederlanden for their financial support for this research and JA Europe for their coordination in this research.
- Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 50–55.Google Scholar
- Botha, M., Nieman, G., & van Vuuren, J. (2006). Enhancing female entrepreneurship by enabling access to skills. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(4), 479-493.Google Scholar
- Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. (2004). Double bottom line project report: Assessing social impact in double bottom line ventures. Methods catalog. New York: Columbia Business School. Retrieved at http://www.shidler.hawaii.edu/Portals/1/resources/DoubleBottomLine.pdf.Google Scholar
- Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Idowu, S. O., & Papasolomou, I. (2007). Are the corporate social responsibility matters based on good intentions or false pretences? An empirical study of the motivations behind the issuing of CSR reports by UK companies. Corporate Governance: The international Journal of Business in Society, 7(2), 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kume, A., Kume, V., & Shahini, B. (2013). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students in Albania. European Scientific Journal, 9, 16.Google Scholar
- Liket, K. C., Rey-Garcia, M., & Maas, K. E. (2014). Why Aren’t Evaluations Working and What to Do About It A Framework for Negotiating Meaningful Evaluation in Nonprofits. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(2), 171–188.Google Scholar
- Maas, K. (2009). Corporate social performance: From output measurement to impact measurement. (No. EPS-2009-182-STR, ERIM Ph.D. Series). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
- Roza, L. (2016). Employee Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility. A collection of essays. (No. EPS-2016-396-ORG). Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
- Samuel, O., Roza, L., & Meijs, L. (2016). Exploring partnerships from the perspective of HSO beneficiaries: The case of corporate volunteering. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(3), 220-237.Google Scholar
- Toxopeus, H. S., Maas, K. E., & Liket, K. C. (2016). Innovating for impact investing. Principles and practice of impact investing: A catalytic revolution (pp. 174–187). Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
- Villagra, N., & López, B. (2013). Analysis of values and communication of the responsible brands. Corporate Brand strategies for sustainability/Análisis de los valores y la comunicación de las Marcas responsables. Estrategias de las marcas corporativas en el contexto de la Sostenibilidad. Communications Society, 26(1), 196–221.Google Scholar