Advertisement

Schizophrenia and the Future of Artificial Intelligence

  • Howard SchneiderEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 948)

Abstract

In the Meaningful-Based Cognitive Architecture (MBCA) the input sensory vector is propagated through a hierarchy of Hopfield-like Network (HLN) functional groups, including a binding of sensory input group of HLNs and a causal group of HLNs, and subsymbolic processing of the input vector occurs in the process. However, the processed sensory input vector is also propagated to the logic/working memory groups of HLNs, where the content of the logic/working memory can be compared to data held by various groups of HLNs of other functional groups, as well as with other logic/working memory units, i.e., symbolic processing occurs. While the MBCA does not attempt to replicate biological systems at the neuronal spiking level, its HLNs and the organization of its HLNs are indeed inspired by biological mammalian minicolumns and mammalian brains. The MBCA model leads to the hypothesis that in the course of hominid evolution, HLNs became co-opted into groups of HLNs providing more extensive working memories with more logical abilities. While such co-option of the minicolumns can allow advantageous symbolic processing integrated with subsymbolic processing, the order of magnitude of increased complexity required for such organization and operation, created a vulnerability in the human brain to psychotic disorders. The emergence of a technological artificial general intelligence (AGI) will, on a practical level, also require the integration of symbolic processing along with subsymbolic structures. The MBCA model predicts that such an integration will similarly create a potential vulnerability in the resultant AGI towards psychotic-like features.

Keywords

Cognitive architecture Artificial general intelligence Cortical minicolumns Psychosis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article builds upon work originally presented at BICA 2018 (reference 1).

References

  1. 1.
    Schneider H (2018) Meaningful-based cognitive architecture. Procedia Comput Sci 145:471–480 BICA 2018 ed Samsonovich AVCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schneider H (2019, in press) Subsymbolic versus symbolic data flow in the meaningful-based cognitive architecture. In: Samsonovich AV (ed) Biologically inspired cognitive architectures 2019. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D et al (2015) Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518(7540):529–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ullman S (2019) Using neuroscience to develop artificial intelligence. Science 363(6428):692–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waismeyer A, Meltzoff AN, Gopnik A (2015) Causal learning from probabilistic events in 24-month-olds: an action measure. Dev Sci 18(1):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson JR, Bothell D, Byrne MD et al (2004) An integrated theory of mind. Psychol Rev 111(4):1036–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kilicay-Ergin N, Jablokow K (2012) Problem-solving variability in cognitive architectures. Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev IEEE Trans 42:1231–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bach J (2008) Seven principles of synthetic intelligence. In: Proceedings of 1st conference on artificial general intelligence, Memphis, pp. 63–74Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenbloom P, Demski A, Ustun V (2016) The sigma cognitive architecture and system: towards functionally elegant grand unification. J Artif Gen Intell 7(1):1–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graves A, Wayne G, Reynolds M et al (2016) Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory. Nature 538:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collier M, Beel J (2018) Implementing neural Turing machines. In: 27th international conference on artificial neural networks (ICANN), Rhodes, Greece, 4–7 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li S, Xu H, Lu Z (2018) Generalize symbolic knowledge with neural rule engine. arXiv:1808.10326
  14. 14.
    Lázaro-Gredilla M, Liu Y, Phoenix DS, George D (2017) Hierarchical compositional feature learning. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1611.02252v2
  15. 15.
    Hawkins J, Blakeslee S (2004) On intelligence. Times Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kurzweil R (2012) How to create a mind. Viking Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sabour S, Frosst N, Hinton GE (2017) Dynamic routing between capsules. In: Conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneider H (2019 in press) Emergence of belief systems and the future of artificial intelligence. In: Samsonovich AV (ed) Biologically inspired cognitive architectures 2019. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mountcastle VB (1997) Columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain 20:701–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buxhoeveden DP, Casanova MF (2002) The minicolumn hypothesis in neuroscience. Brain 125(Pt 5):935–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schwalger T, Deger M, Gerstner W (2017) Towards a theory of cortical columns. PLoS Comput Biol 13(4):e1005507.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eliasmith C, Trujillo O (2014) The use and abuse of large-scale brain models. Curr Opin Neurobiol 25:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D (1992) Context, cortex and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev 99(1):45–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sabaroedin K, Tiego J, Parkers L et al (2018) Functional connectivity of corticostriatal circuitry and psychosis-like experiences in the general community. Biol Psychiatry 86(1):16–24 pii: S0006-3223(19)30119-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Os J, Hanssen M, Bijil RV et al (2001) Prevalence of psychotic disorder and community level psychotic symptoms: an urban-rural comparison. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58(7):663–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jones CA, Watson DJG, Fone KCF (2011) Animal models of schizophrenia. Br J Pharmacol 164:1162–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang R, Picchioni M, Allen P et al (2016) Working memory in unaffected relatives of patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Schizophr Bull 42(4):1068–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Anttila V, Bulik-Sullivan B et al (2018) Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science 360(6395):eaap8757.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8757
  29. 29.
    Bechdolf A, Wagner M, Ruhrmann S et al (2012) Preventing progression to first-episode psychosis in early initial prodromal states. Br J Psychiatry 200(1):22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sheppard Clinic NorthTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations