Advertisement

Shylock’s Turquoise Ring: Jane Austen, Mansfield Park and the‘Exquisite Acting’ of Edmund Kean

  • Judith W. Page
Chapter

Abstract

There are no Jewish characters or developed Jewish subjects in any of Austen’s novels or fragments. Despite this absence, there is an intriguing if oblique connection in her letters: in March of 1814, just as she had finished a draft of Mansfield Park, Jane Austen comments on Edmund Kean, who had debuted in the role of Shylock on 26 January 1814 at Drury Lane. Visiting London in March, Austen refers to the great ‘rage for seeing Keen [sic]’ that she shares, and then comments again on Kean’s ‘exquisite acting’ after she sees him. But the question remains: Why was she so affected by Kean’s rendition of Shylock?

This question guides the present chapter. This chapter suggests that, having completed Mansfield Park, in which Fanny Price begins life as a kind of outcast, Austen was particularly susceptible to a play about Shylock, the dispossessed Jew. Moreover, Kean’s performance of Shylock (as simultaneously sympathetic, monstrous and fascinating) brought out seemingly contradictory, complex responses to Otherness in Austen, as well as in her contemporaries, such as Hazlitt. Her response gives us insight into the creation of Mansfield Park.

Bibliography

  1. Austen, Jane. Jane Austen’s Letters. 3rd edn. Collected and edited by Deirdre le Faye. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. ———. Mansfield Park. Norton Critical Edition. Edited by Claudia Johnson. New York: Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. ———. Northanger Abbey. Edited by Marilyn Butler. New York: Penguin Books, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Auerbach, Nina. ‘Jane Austen’s Dangerous Charm: Feeling as One Ought about Fanny Price’, 1983; rpt. Mansfield Park. Norton Critical Edition. Edited by Claudia Johnson. New York: Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Barchas, Janine and Kristina Straub. ‘Jane Austen’s Shakespeare’, In Shakespeare & Beyond: 12 August 2016. Web. 4 January 2018. https://shakespeareandbeyond.folger.edu/2016/08/12/jane-austen-william-shakespeare/.
  6. Boswell, Jackson Campbell. ‘Shylock’s Turquoise Ring’, Shakespeare Quarterly 14.4 (Autumn 1963): 481–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, John Russell. ‘The Realisation of Shylock: A Theatrical Criticism’, Early Shakespeare, Stratford-upon-Avon Studies 3. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1961. 187–203.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, Paula. Jane Austen and the Theatre. New York: Hambledon & London, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Carlson, Julie A. ‘On Point.’ Minimal Romanticism. Edited by David L. Clark and Jacques Khalip. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (ISSN: 1528-8129). https://www.rc.umd.edu/praxis. [accessed 26 May, 2016]
  10. Cowden Clarke, Charles. Recollections of Writers. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1878.Google Scholar
  11. Deresiewicz, William. Jane Austen and the Romantic Poets. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. Donahue, Joseph. Theatre in the Age of Kean. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Edgeworth, Maria. Harrington. Edited by Susan Manly. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Fraiman, Susan. ‘Jane Austen and Edward Said: Gender, Culture, and Imperialism’. In Janeites: Austen’s Disciples and Devotees. Edited by Deidre Lynch. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000, 206–23.Google Scholar
  15. Galchinsky, Michael. The Origin of the Modern Jewish Woman Writer: Romance and Reform in Victorian England. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. Gay, Penny. Jane Austen and the Theatre. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  17. Grant, Tony. ‘The Saga of Jane Austen’s Ring, and the American Connection’. Jane Austen’s World. 6 October 2013. Web. 4 January 2018: https://janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2013/10/06/the-saga-of-jane-austens-ring-and-the-american-connection/.
  18. Greenfield, Sayre. ‘The Source for the Theatricals of Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park: A Discovery’. Persuasions 38 (2016): 197–204. Web. 4 January 2018: http://www.jasna.org/publications/persuasions/no38/the-source-for-the-theatricals-of-jane-austens-mansfield-park-a-discovery/.
  19. Hawkins, F. W. The Life of Edmund Kean. 2 vols. London: Tinsley Brothers, 1869.Google Scholar
  20. Hazlitt, William. The Complete Works of William Hazlitt. 21 vols. Edited by P. P. Howe, after A. P. Waller and Arnold Glover. New York: ASM Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  21. Hillebrand, Harold Newcomb. Edmund Kean. New York: AMS Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  22. Kahan, Jeffrey. The Cult of Kean. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Keats, John. Selected Letters of John Keats. Rev. edn. Grant F. Scott. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. Mahood, M. M. Introduction and editorial notes. The Merchant of Venice. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. London: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 1–53.Google Scholar
  25. Page, Judith W. Imperfect Sympathies: Jews and Judaism in British Romantic Literature and Culture. New York: Palgrave, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radford, Michael, dir. William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice.Sony Pictures, 2005. DVD.Google Scholar
  27. Ragussis, Michael. Figures of Conversion: The Jewish Question and English National Identity. Durham: Duke University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shakespeare, William. The Merchant of Venice. The Folger Shakespeare Library. Edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010.Google Scholar
  29. Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus. Edited by Susan J. Wolfson. New York: Longman, 2003.Google Scholar
  30. ———. The Journals of Mary Shelley: 1814–1844. Edited by Paula R. Feldman and Diana Scott-Kilvert. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  31. Stoll, Elmer Edgar. ‘Shylock’. Shakespeare Studies: Historical and Comparative in Method. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., 1960: 255–336.Google Scholar
  32. Sunder Rajan, Rajeswari. ‘Austen in the World: Postcolonial Mappings’. In The Postcolonial Jane Austen. Edited by You-me Park and Rajeswari Sunder Rajan. London and New York: Routledge, 2000, 3–25.Google Scholar
  33. Tiffany, Grace. The Turquoise Ring. New York: Berkley Books, 2005.Google Scholar
  34. Thomson, Peter. ‘Acting and Actors from Garrick to Kean’. In The Cambridge Companion to British Theatre, 1730–1830. Edited by Jane Moody and Daniel O’Quinn. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 3–19.Google Scholar
  35. Tuite, Clara. Romantic Austen: Sexual Politics and the Literary Canon. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  36. Wordsworth, William. The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth. Edited by Ernest de Selincourt and Helen Darbishire. 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940–1949.Google Scholar
  37. ———. The Prose Works of William Wordsworth. 3 vols. Edited by W. J. B. Owen and Jane Worthington Smyser. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  38. Worthen, William B. The Idea of the Actor: Drama and the Ethics of Performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith W. Page
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations