Advertisement

Bilateral Positive Integration: Different Strategies for Regulatory Cooperation in the TTIP

  • Christine WieckEmail author
  • Bettina Rudloff
Chapter
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR)

Abstract

This article discusses regulatory cooperation in the area of food safety in trade agreements with a special attention to the EU-US negotiations about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. We show how food safety is regulated in trade agreements and what regulatory cooperation approaches between countries and internationally regarding food safety exist. There were several high-profile disputes at the WTO dealing with food safety issues. These cases show how solutions for heterogeneous food safety regulation can be found and constitute viable alternatives to regulatory cooperation and harmonization of standards. A “race to the bottom” of food safety standards is not necessarily the case when countries cooperate on food safety matters.

References

  1. Badulescu D, Baylis K (2006) Pesticide regulation under NAFTA harmonization in process?. Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network (CATPRN Commissioned Paper 2006-0, Guelph, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  2. Brouwer, Fox, Jongeneel (2012) The economics of regulation in agriculture - compliance with public and private standards. CABI InternationalGoogle Scholar
  3. EUR-Lex (2015) The precautionary principle. EUR-Lex - l32042 – EN. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV:l32042. Accessed 22 May 2019
  4. European Commission (2015) Food hygiene – basic legislation. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/biosafety/food_hygiene/legislation_en. Accessed 22 May 2019
  5. European Communities (2002) EC Regulation EC/178/2002. Official Journal of the European Communities L31/1. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. European Union (2013) Trade cross-cutting disciplines and institutional provisions. Initial EU position paper. European Commission, Brussels (Belgium)Google Scholar
  7. European Union (2016a) TTIP-EU proposal for Chapter: Regulatory Cooperation. Textual proposal. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/march/tradoc_154377.pdf (22.05.2019)
  8. European Union (2016b) Regulatory cooperation in TTIP. An introduction to the EU’s revised proposal. 21 March 2016. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/march/tradoc_154378.pdf (22.05.2019)
  9. European Union (2017) U.S. - EU Joint Report on TTIP Progress to Date. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/january/tradoc_155242.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2019
  10. FAO (2016) Definition of food quality. Internet page. Available at: http://www.fao.org/food/food-safety-quality/capacity-development/food-regulations/en/ (22.05.2019)
  11. FAO/WHO (2003) Assuring food safety and quality. Guidelines for strengthening national food control systems. FAO Food and Nutrition paper 76. RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Green T, Hanson L, Lee L, Fanghanel H, Zahniser S (2006) North American approaches to regulatory coordination. In: Huff KM, Meilke KD, Knutson RD, Ochoa RF, Rude J (eds) Agrifood regulatory and policy integration under stress. GuelphGoogle Scholar
  13. Hobbs JE, Kerr WA (2006) Consumer information, labelling and international trade in agri-food products. Food Policy 31:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooker NH (1999) Food safety regulation and trade in food products. Food Policy 24:653–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Humphrey J (2012) Convergence of US and EU production practices under the new FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. World Econ 35(8):994–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Josling T, Tangermann S (2015) Agriculture, food and the TTIP: possibilities and pitfalls. In: Hamilton DS, Pelkmans J (eds) Rule-makers or rule-takers? Exploring the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Rowman and Littlefield International London and Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  17. Josling T, Roberts D, Orden D (2004) Food regulation and trade: toward a safe and open global system. Institute for International Economics, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerr WM (2018) Dealing with disputes over agricultural trade. In: Josling T, Meilke KD (eds) Handbook on agricultural and food policies, volume III: international trade rules for food and agricultural products. World Scientific PublisherGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthews A (2015) What outcome to expect on geographical indications in the TTIP free trade agreement negotiations with the United States? Paper presented at the 145th EAAE Seminar “Intellectual Property Rights for Geographical Indications: What is at Stake in the TTIP?”. ParmaGoogle Scholar
  20. Meilke K, Rude J, Zahniser S (2008) Is ‘NAFTA Plus’ an option in the North American Agrifood Sector? World Econ 28(8):925–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD (1994) Regulatory co-operation for an interdependent world. Paris (France)Google Scholar
  22. OECD (2015) Regional trade agreements and agriculture, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 79. Paris (France)Google Scholar
  23. Orden D, Roberts D (2007) Food regulation and trade under the WTO: ten years in perspective. Agric Econ 37(31):103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rudloff B (2014) Food standards in trade agreements. SWP Comments 2014/C49. Berlin (Germany)Google Scholar
  25. Sparling DH, Caswell AJ (2006) Risking market integration without regulatory integration: the case of NAFTA and BSE. Rev Agric Econ 28(2):212–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thilmany DD, Barrett CB (1997) Regulatory barriers in an integrating world food market. Rev Agric Econ 19:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. UNCTAD (2012) Classification of non-tariff measures. UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/2012/2. UNCTAD. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  28. United States Trade Representative (2016) Non-tariff barriers and regulatory issues. Internet page. Available at: https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/transatlantic-trade-and-investment-partnership-t-tip/t-tip-2 (22.05.2019)
  29. Viju C, Yeung MT, Kerr WA (2012) Geographical indications, barriers to market access and preferential trade agreements. Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network (CATPRN Commissioned Paper 2012-01, Guelph, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  30. Watson W (2016) Reign of terroir. How to resist Europe’s effort to control common food names as a geographical indications. Policy Analysis Number 787. Cato Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. WHO (2016) Definition of food safety. Internet page. Available at: http://www.who.int/topics/food_safety/en/ (22.05.2019)
  32. Winchester N, Rau ML, Goetz C, Larue B, Otsuki T, Shutes K, Wieck C, Burnquist HL, Pinto de Souza MJ, de Faria RN (2012) The impact of regulatory heterogeneity on agri-food trade. World Econ 35(8):973–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wouters J, Geraets D (2012) Private food standards and the World Trade Organization: some legal considerations, Working Paper (82), Leuven (Belgium)Google Scholar
  34. WTO (2003) Dictionary of trade policy terms, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, 437 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. WTO (2007) Private standards and the SPS agreement. Note by the secretariat. G/SPS/GEN/746. Geneva (Switzerland)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HohenheimStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.The German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations