Advertisement

Introduction—Positive Integration: EU and WTO Approaches Towards the ‘Trade and’ Debate

  • Rike Krämer-HoppeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR)

Abstract

The ‘trade and’ debate is concerned with the relationship between trade liberalisation and other non-economic values or concerns like the protection of the environment or human health. Both the EU as well as the WTO struggle in finding the right balance between different values. In the twenty-first century, especially in times like these, when free trade and economic integration are more and more called into question, finding convincing normative answers or ways to address this very complex relationship between trade and other policies is even more pressing. This special issue uses the framework of positive, negative and non-integration to describe and assess solutions and problem-solving capacities for the ‘trade and’ interlinkage. Comparing the WTO and the EU through this framework not only allows for a comprehensive assessment of all the solutions or mechanisms already in place, it also enables new visions and answers for the ‘trade and’ debate.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to all the participants of the Workshop “Trade and Environment—Positive Integration in the EU and the WTO” at the Ruhr-University Bochum partly funded also by the Ruhr University. With a special thanks to Piet Eeckhout, Stefan Magen, Joanne Scott, Fiona Smith, Maria Lee and Markus Krajewski for their comments on earlier versions of this introductory and conceptual chapter.

References

  1. Alter KJ, Meunier-Aitsahalia S (1994) Judicial politics in the European Community – European Integration and the pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon decision. Comp Polit Stud 26(4):535–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Charnowitz S (2007) A new WTO paradigm for trade and the environment. Singap Yearb Int Law 11:15–40Google Scholar
  3. Cole M (2003) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2003) Trade and the environment – theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Sousa P (2012) Negative and positive integration in EU economic law: between strategic denial and cognitive dissonance? German Law J 13:979–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeBievre D (2004) Governance in Internationale trade: judicialisation and positive integration in the WTO. Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, 2004/7Google Scholar
  7. El-Agraa A (1997) Economic integration Worldwide. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emerson J, Esty DC, Srebotnjak T, Connett D (2011) Exploring trade and the environment: an empirical examination of trade openness and National Environmental Performance. Center for Environmental Law & Policy, Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  9. Esty D (1994) Greening the GATT, trade, environment and the future. Institute of International Economics, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaines SE, Olsen BE, Sørensen KE (eds) (2012) Liberalising trade in the EU and the WTO - a legal comparison. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Grossmann G, Krueger A (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper 3914Google Scholar
  12. Kischel U (2015) Rechtsvergleichung. C.H.Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  13. Kötz H, Zweigert K (1996) Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, 3rd edn. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  14. Krämer RU (2014) “Trade and” environment: diagonal conflicts in WTO, EU and U.S. procurement law. Jean Monnet Working Paper 13Google Scholar
  15. Krämer R, Märten JJ (2015) Der Dialog der Gerichte – die Fortentwicklung des Persönlichkeitsschutzes im europäischen Mehrebenenrechtsverbund. Europarecht 50:169–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lydgate E (2012) Biofuels, sustainability and trade-related regulatory chill. J Int Econ Law 15(1):157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Majone G (2005) Dilemmas of European Integration: the ambiguities and pitfalls of integration by stealth. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCrudden C (1999) International economic law and the pursuit of human rights: a framework for discussion of the legality of ‘Selective Purchasing’ laws under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement. J Int Econ Law 2(1):3–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Notaro N (2003) Judical approaches to trade and environment: the EC and the WTO. Cameron May, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Petersmann E-U (2000) From ‘Negative’ to ‘Positive’ integration in the WTO: time for ‘Mainstreaming Human Rights’ into WTO Law? Common Market Law Rev 37:1363–1382Google Scholar
  21. Reid E (2015) Balancing human rights and environmental protection and international trade: lessons from the EU experience. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Scharpenseel MF (2001) Consequences of EU Airline deregulation in the context of the global aviation market. Northwest J Int Law Bus 22:91–116Google Scholar
  23. Scharpf F (1999) Governing in Europe: effective and democratic. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scharpf F (2010) The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a ‘social market economy’. Socio-Econ Rev 8:211–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shaffer G (2015) How the WTO shapes regulatory Governance. University of California Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No 2014–53Google Scholar
  26. Shahbaz M, Nasreen M, Ahmed K (2017) Trade openness-carbon emission nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Siems M (2014) Comparative law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Tinbergen J (1965) International economic integration, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. Trujillo E (2013) A dialogical approach to trade and environment. J Int Econ Law 16(3):535–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. VanGrassteck C (2013) The history of the World Trade Organisation. WTO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. Vranes E (2009) Trade and the environment – fundamental issues in international law, WTO law and legal theory. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiers J (2002) Trade and environment in the EC and the WTO: a legal analysis. Europa Law Publishing, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams III RC (2010) Growing state-federal conflicts in environmental policy: the role of market-based regulation. NBER Working Paper No. 16184: 1–25Google Scholar
  34. Wu M, Salzmann J (2014) The next generation of trade and environment conflicts: the rise of green industrial policy. Northwest Univ Law Rev 108:401–474Google Scholar
  35. Young AR (2005) Picking the wrong fight: why attacks on the World Trade Organization pose the real threat to national environmental and public health protection. Global Environ Polit 5(4):47–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ruhr-University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations